…you are very stupid and deserve what you get. I wouldn’t have thought it was possible to organize a political party around phony outrages and vote manipulation, but that’s the entire agenda now.
Petraeus was busy knocking knocking off Taliban in Waziristan & Al Qaeda in Yemin Perhaps … The Deputy Director signed off… I am sure that is allowed.
But unfortunately for you the released emails show that you are wrong.
All we need to know now is whether you will now with the emails available, respect the truth.
And here it is:
IT was not the FINAL VERSON that the CIA merely signed off on. The spontaneous demonstration sparked by a VDO was in the original drafts prior to any editing by the White House and State Dept.
They probably would have done that, which is why the military should NEVER be given carte blanche in fighting wars.
If you are a liberal, I see your desire for the betterment of humanity stops outside The US.
<This assessment may change as additional information is collected and analyzed and currently available information continues to be evaluated.>
Hardly a cast iron statement of facts.
Hardly surprising as it seems not many Obama supporters actually know where or what Benghazi is, and some die hard Obama supporters don’t even know who the VP is, hahahahahahahaha.
As opposed to Doggo, who doesn’t know…well, anything. When he leaves the planet, the net intelligence of the species will go up. Unless someone was stupid enough to breed with him. Then all bets are off.
Doggo, you asserted that Lobohan believes generals “never make a mistake” and offered Vietnam as an example of “a general” making a mistake. Then you claimed “liberals think that the military are stupid imbiciles {sic} most of the time, but infallible geniuses when it suits them”.
After I disemboweled your rank stupidity with regard to Vietnam and destroyed your argument about generals, you reply with
Whatever the fuck does this mean? I recognize all the words as valid elements of the English language, but strive as I may, I cannot parse the meaning of your word strings, nor divine any connection between them and what I said.
No, never mind, take mine as a rhetorical question, don’t even attempt to explain your latest asininities on this subject. Return if you will to the subject of the OP, on which you are having your head nicely handed to you already. I need a few more good laughs.
Well done for noticing that situational data is not immediately magically beamed *in toto *directly into the heads of CIA researchers but in fact has to be gathered from remote sources over time, reviewed for reliability and occasionally revised as new information is received. I commend you for your grasp of the bleeding obvious, and for making NotfooledbyW’s point for him.
I know where Benghazi is and I know how to read the emails that the White House made public and that ability to read common simple language enables me to verify without a shadow of a doubt that any muddle-headed Republican that tries to claim that the WH took down the CIA’s first assessment and reduced it to a pack of lies are themselves spewing all the lies.
A political party that lies ‘top down’ to its adherents as much as the Republican/Conservative Party lies should be headed toward failure.
This Republican Party Benghazi lies are important since these lies are provable and you can see when some GOP leaders hold back you know they are ashamed when they see their fanatics out their dancing on the graves of four dead Americans serving their nation overseas in a dangerous part of the world.