Will "BHENGAZI-GATE" screw up Hitlery's chances in 2016?

From whom is it that you get all the things that you believe, Doggo? Such as your belief that President Obama gave a speech at the UN and was seen on TV by millions but someone must have told you that Obama told the UN is was the Video to blame for the attack at Benghazi, according to you:
“And, you still haven’t said why Obama told the UN it was the VDO, when he knew it was not.” -Doggo

So since he did no such thing, it means you ‘made it up’ (a no-no) for honest people with integrity or some politician or right wing pundit ‘told’ you that and you ‘believed’ them.

Doesn’t say much in your favor does it?

Who says Democrats cannot be hawkish. With voters I think it is more about smart hawkish or stupid hawkish ‘ala’ the 43’rd President.
Anyway this is not stupid hawkishness. This is brilliant hawkishness and hawkishness with principles and conviction. This is from a great speech. Anyone who makes comments on Senator Clinton’s Hawkishness in 2002 should read it.

That speech was given prior to UN inspectors returning to Iraq.

I’m guessing the voices in his head, which speak with Sean Hannity’s voice. We can only offer our pity to this poor, poor man.

What happened in Libya is clearly the biggest scandal in US politics since Richard Nixon resigned in the wake of Waterghazi.

You’re not including all the corruption and bribery uncovered by Whitewatergateghazi?

Define the alleged crime that happened in Libya.

Hillary and Vince Foster’s zombie tried to reanimate the corpse of Gadaffy using an illegally-downloaded program hacked out of Richard Nixon’s library.

There was no crime in Libya.

If you didn’t see the obvious sarcasm dripping off my post when I referred to Nixon being involved in “Waterghazi” then I’m afraid I can’t help you.

Some of our dopers suffer from sarcastic anemia, irony-poor blood. There is no cure.

For the sarcasm impaired.

But . . . but . . . but . . . there must be a crime in Libya! Why else would members of Congress, who have so many weighty matters* on their hands and minds, devote so much of their valuable time to the matter?

*Such as making sure that only the right people — 70-plus-year-old men — are in charge of women’s reproductive choices.

I think a 3d printer was involved.

Feigning sarcasm is a favorite tool used by Republicans so that their like-minded ill-informed masses can absorb lies more readily.

I see no point in aiding abetting that process. So many on the right can’t tell the difference and specifically if they don’t know the background of whoever is using sarcasm…

Do cats like sheepskin bathmats? Why, yes they do. They like to sleep on them, they like to make happy feet on them. They like to pounce on them and slide them all over the bathrooms.

Last but certainly not least, they just LOVE to flipping puke on them. The best fun is to puke on them while a human is in the shower and so won’t know that there is a hairball mine waiting for them when they get out.

Flipping cats, I’m so ready to trade them all in for a pet rock now. I understand pet rocks are great pets, they don’t puke on bathmats, they don’t chase balls in the middle of the night and they don’t get stuck in trash cans. But if they do get stuck in trash cans, they are pretty easy to bathe.

I’m a little slow here, flatlined, what does this have to do with the OP? Or did you just accidentally post to the wrong thread? (Not trying to be a jerk here.)

So one of the primary Congressional critics over Benghazi got to hear some classified information that might be of interest to our friendly keyboard generals.

A senior House Republican says U.S. military forces weren’t in a position to help those under attack at a U.S. diplomatic post in Libya because the State Department had failed to ask the Pentagon for help in securing the compound before the raid.

So now its back to the lame, they should have been prepared. Yawntastic.

lol :smiley:

Any thread with “Hitlery” in the title is just inviting cat puke.