I’m referring to the description from wikipedia.
Cultural Marxism is a generic term referring to a loosely associated group of Marxists who have sought to apply critical theory to matters of family composition, gender, race, and cultural identity within Western society. Nothing in there to imply anything for Sweden’s immigration policy, nor its purported rejection of the concept of national identity/culture.
As for Critical Theory in general, it might be useful, it might be useless, but it is neither evil nor nonsense.
And I’m still waiting for RaleighRally or somebody to explain how “cultural Marxism” was imposed on Sweden from outside.
That takes bollocks to a whole new level of amazingness.
Actually it is below 50%. Here is the table for 2006, page 67 http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/17957/2010-3-11.pdf
Light green = Unstable labor
Green = Core labour
[QUOTE=SherwoodAnderson]
19 out of every 20 hate crimes against non ethnical swedes are not carried out against jews but other immigrants.
But only those 1 out of 20 against jews seems to bother you at all - not the others?
[/QUOTE]
There are only 18000 Jews in Sweden but almost 2 million with a migrant background. Jews are therefore disproportionately exposed to harassment.
Help in the vicinity of centers of conflict is much more cost efficient and saves more lives and rules out false asylum claims.
How would you react if your home country was filled with more and more crime/benefit-prone foreigners for each year?
We are talking about the world’s most generous welfare state! Those who cannot provide for themselves and their families have a right to social welfare, which according to Swedish law must cover the cost for food, clothes, shoes, leisure activities, health and hygiene, health care and medicines, a daily newspaper, a phone, living expenses, electricity, commuting to work, home insurance, membership in a workers’ union and unemployment insurance. The frustrated and angry youngsters in Rosengård get health care at a minimal cost, free dental care, free school, and free college and university education, with the right to student benefits and loans.
Health care system, generous vacation, protection of workers, and so on, has nothing todo with political correctness.
Neither does immigration policy.
It depends on the country. I think in Israel it would be perfectly normal to be anti-immigration of non-Jews. But in Arizona or Sweden it sure would be very politically incorrect to be anti-immigration of non-germanic speaking people. Germanic languages - Wikipedia
Move to Sweden.
@ Sherwood Anderson
Just on this point about the figures from Super Economy regarding employment rates of non-western immigrants being about 50%. This paper cites cites 80% employment rate for Swedes versus a 55 percent for non-European immigrants (but that includes North America). If you look at the Employment database of Statistics Sweden", the share of the population 20-64 who were gainfully employed in 2009 was:
Born in Sweden: 79.3%
Born in Asia, Africa, Latin America: 46.5%
In Arizona it is anything but politically incorrect to be anti-immigration of non-Germanic-speaking people.
So why all this fuss about boycotting Arizona? My explanation is that Arizona violates the sacred principles of political correctness, that is, open borders and massive immigration. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37113818/ns/us_news-life/t/la-approves-boycott-arizona/
Sweden: The Triumph of Cultural Marxism
“We do not believe in artificial borders. We have a vision of unrestricted immigration and emigration, where people have the right to live and work wherever they please… We want Sweden to become an international role model by producing a plan to implement unrestricted immigration.”
What he’s describing there seems to be the European Union, at least internally.
What, you think immigrants from Poland are any less dangerous to Swedish national culture than immigrants from Morocco? They’re not.
Well, I think there is evidence to suggest otherwise:
Not if you read the article, then it is clear what is sought. Here’s an excerpt:
*The Green Party favor ideological Globalism in its purest form. They want a “world citizenship” to replace the national citizenship, totally free migration on a global basis, global taxes and a strengthened United Nations to ensure a just world order.
Actually there was a Swedish-Polish union at one time.Polish–Swedish union - Wikipedia
Swedes and Poles are more culturally compatible than Moroccans. You know deep down that I’m right, but I’m not politically correct and therefore you can not agree with me.
I think a fundamental part of this, at least based on the Green Party comment, is the desire to remove any distinctions which relate to cultural or traditional identities. Of course if you remove all distinctions you can’t point to the obvious reasons why Poles might be more assimilable in Sweden than Moroccans (racial and cultural similarity - you just pretend those things don’t exist).