...will the board consider explicit transphobia hate-speech?

Jragon, I totally get it if you decide to quit the board, but I selfishly hope you don’t, because I learn a lot from you. You’re appreciated!

I think this is a very worthwhile discussion but since I’m pretty ignorant on many of the nuances I’m mostly just reading rather than participating.

Straw poll: Imgur: The magic of the Internet

I asked, and unless you think Urbanredneck was dishonest in his reply, it was an honest mistake.

~Max

Seconded!

I honestly strain to believe anyone could possibly reasonably think a “trans man” refers to a trans woman if they know even the slightest amount about trans people (including the small amount needed to complain about it). Like even the articles Urban Redneck links get it right, and he’s surely heard famous trans women referred to as “trans women”, not to mention all the people – including everyone on his side of the debate – consistently using it correctly on the board in the numerous trans discussions he’s participated in going back a couple years. “I have trouble keeping them straight” seems like a not-even-that-cryptic way of saying “I can’t tell trans women apart from men” (and the same for trans men). But whatever, I don’t care enough to give an opinion on modding either way.

Same here.

It’s not easy to put ideological differences aside, but it’s part of life. Catholics have told me, to my face, that they believe I am guilty of mortal sins and will spend eternity burning in the depths of hell, repeatedly being sodomized by demons and being skinned alive etc - that I deserve to do so. I disagree with them on many, many levels. It doesn’t affect whether we can stay friends. That’s what it means to be tolerant.

One of my former friends was right on the edge of being a white supremacist. I am ethnically Chinese-Ashkenazi (third-generation/fourth-generation immigrants respectively), and my normally light skin turns yellow then dark, dark brown with exposure to sunlight. We drifted apart geographically, but while we were friends I didn’t ignore or accept his ideology.

Half of my extended family - probably more than half - affiliates with the Democratic party. That doesn’t prevent us from getting together every now and again and having a good time. My Republican father recently pulled an old-man-pissed-off-at-everything-especially-Democrats on my cousin, a Democrat activist and homosexual twice my age. After at least two hours attempting to keep a civil tone, the debate ended with two grown men laughing and hugging eachother with smiles all around.

I don’t play too many video games so I don’t know if I could help in that department. But beware the bystander effect. If everybody is waiting for activity in video game threads before they start participating, the threads never get up off the ground. :frowning:

You feel a duty to eradicate ignorance? That’s commendable! But if it’s stressing you out too much, don’t do it.

That’s understandable, I suppose. I get tired of doing politics and constitutional law all the time, and by the time a debate is finished I’m happy that it’s over even if I’ve lost. Debating is exhausting. What can I say except, if it’s not working for you, don’t do it?

~Max

OK, so from this thread it sounds like the board is fine with asserting that someone is not a real man or woman. So it appears that it would be fine to respond to a poster saying ‘trans women aren’t real women, they just pretend to be’ with ‘men who don’t respect gender identity aren’t real men’. Or is questioning the realness of someone’s gender only allowed if they are trans, and questioning whether a cis person is a real man or woman is strictly against board rules?

Under a definition of man=adult male human and woman=adult female human, saying that someone isn’t actually an adult male human because they don’t “respect gender identity” is nonsensical.

I would advise never ascribing to malice that which can be sufficiently explained through ignorance. Their subsequent communication with Max S. seems to back up my position.

The novelty of that definition of men suggests that you made it up as a petty “no you” response, rather than it being a sincere argument. I mean, it is possible that you define the male gender such that people who do not respect gender identity cannot be male. It doesn’t pass the smell test, but I suppose it is possible if you are serious about redefining the male gender in such a way.

~Max

Not understanding why the above statement would in any way be considered “hate speech”.

That is a statement of fact, its undeniable, and trying to stop people from being able to say it is a weak position to have.

I cant comprehend why people on the left have this crazy fixation with stopping people from saying things.

Your first paragraph is resoundingly clear. Your second one begins with nonsense.

:confused: Why would we (after all that’s been said in this thread) define “man” as “adult male human”?

Inerta, from generation after generation after generation after generation of it meaning precisely that?

I have two dictionaries on my phone. In the Oxford Dictionary of English, this is the definition:

And in Merriam-Webster it is this:

You are not, yourself, saying this is the definition we should utilize, though, right? I’m not misconstruing you?

Do note that “adult female/male human” is (besides being meaningless, trans men are still male) a common transphobic dogwhistle used in actual hate propaganda

Like to be honest I’m not sure what this whole “male/female” thing is, it has never made sense. Like people hear “man” changing and are like “ah, so MALE still means the same thing! Haha! I’ve got it!” and like… no? They’re still synonyms guys, the change in one implies the change to the other, and is also immensely disingenuous. Like if I pointed at a dude (passing or otherwise) and said “he’s male” you almost certainly wouldn’t assume I meant AMAB/has a penis, prostate etc, UNLESS YOU ALREADY HOLD THAT MEN MUST HAVE THOSE THINGS. That is, you wouldn’t treat the phrase as any differently from “he’s a man/boy”. It’s just restating the argument with different words.

You may as well just say what you mean: “an adult cis man.”