Why would GM build an EV-2? There was no money in it. They floated a concept car to see what kind of reaction it got. A direct comparison would be Chrysler’s turbojet car.
The EV-1 was never a luxury car. It was a concept car aimed at regular drivers.
The antipathy goes to the consumer. There wasn’t a market for it.
Tesla didn’t force anybody to do anything. They weren’t the first with a modern electric and they won’t be the first with a modern family EV. GM has their entry level EV on the road as we speak being evaluated. Tesla has a brochure. Maybe. Not even sure of that. They have a website.
Fact. there is no Model 3 at the moment. Like every other Tesla car it’s a gleam in a promoter’s eye. GM has their car on the road.
That’s nothing but opinion. It completely ignores all the other cars on the road that the Bolt will actually compete against. Again, it’s like saying Porsche influenced the Chevy Vega with the 914. It’s not a logical statement. Now if you said the Porsche 356 influenced the VW Karmann Ghia… That would make some sense.
So, since the Model 3 isn’t likely to hit the market first it’s highly unlikely it will be the one to influence American driving. Unless it bursts into flames. Then it will set the EV’s back a few years.
And once again, we have the Magiver 2010 argument: the Model S isn’t real because it doesn’t exist right now.
Uh, do you mean the Volt?
It is a straw man argument you’ve advanced dozens of times. Stop it.
If the Model 3 gets the same sort of reviews that the Model S got, it won’t matter which car got to market first. You should know damn well that Tesla has a better chance of making a revolutionary car than the company that created the Pontiac Aztek.
Then it will be a year late without the production or sales resources to compete.
Remember the Volt and all the great reviews it got? It didn’t have the sales resources in place to showcase it.
the Model S is a luxury car. People who buy it can afford to have a 2nd or 3rd car without any range. The Model 3 has to be a practical car that people can rely on as a daily driver and get serviced. That requires service centers.
Here’s the thing: I think you have the bones of a decent case against Tesla. Tesla has less capital than established automakers. The Leaf already exists. It’s possible that cars like the Model Ξ will revolutionize American driving, but they will be Nissans, Fords, and Hondas.
And then you go and embarrass yourself with posts like this:
I’m sorry, this is a colossally ignorant statement.
How can anyone be that big a Chevy fanboy?
Nah, I almost think you work for Tesla, and you’re arguing against them to get us to defend them, so that we develop a brand affinity and buy Model Ξ when it comes out.
I don’t know if that fits with all the posts you spent complaining about short-range batteries, but otherwise it actually seems to fit your behavior.
By all means, state your case for Tesla’s advance on technology and how it is going to revolutionize how Americans drive. that’s the question asked.
All I’ve done is point out who has the resources and who doesn’t. GM, Ford, Toyota, Nissan, Mazda, Kia, etc… all have more resources than Tesla and will flood the market with the EV’s they’re working on.
Shall we apply this logic to Apple and how they consistently sold out of early iPhones, forcing people to wait weeks for a consumer gadget, and yet still people couldn’t get enough of it?
Wow, Apple was a really crappy company. Samsung and had the resources that Apple didn’t have, so I assume Apple failed as a company a few years back. I haven’t been checking, though.