Will this get "locked up" too? Shutting down opposing views. tut tut tut

I did not make up these things or invent them or imagine them, cuz of some wishful thinking. It’s a non-debatable fact that getting laid makes a person healthier and calmer. Studies show that men and women who have sex on a regular basis (at least 2 or 3 times a week) LIVE LONGER, suffer fewer health problems, fewer colds and flues, fewer psychicatric disorders, and are just generally happier and healthier than those who long periods of time without it. Sexual activity releases an enzyme in the brain that fights against every disease in the body. It’s good for the body-chemistry. The muscles and neurology improve. I don’t have time to list every author, copyright, or page number or article. And what I just stated has been stated in many articles and comprehensive studies, like galore. IT’S IRREFUTABLE. And the hard fact is that it’s HETERO-SEXUAL SEX. Forget about agendas, and deal with cold reality. POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS NOT THE TRUTH. Wake up. Of course ther’s “an exchange of body fluids” and enzyme and body chemistry alteration during homosexual sex. AND NOT FOR THE BETTER. It’s even worse than masturbation. (Masturbation is a subtle form of homosexuality anyway. How so? Well think about it. Your penis should be stimulated by a woman’s hand or mouth or foot or vagina or whatever, not your own hand. If a man stimulates a penis for sexual gratification it’s homosexual EVEN IF IT’S HIS OWN PENIS. And I see allllll the people on this thread throwing a fit right now. Steam coming out of a few people’s ears, and nostrils flaring. And some rudely laughing, cuz it’s not something they’re used to reading. But never mind. The point is that under ideal circumstances a man would not be touching a man’s penis for sexual pleasure, even his own. His own penis or testes should be touched by a woman for that purpose. That’s the ideal. Agendas be damned. Hard facts be raised up. Pun?) Anyway, getting back to homosexual sex. Well look at the result. Homosexuals look and sound different for a reason. Their whole body-chemistry has been so screwed up with their un-natural actions and they’re generally sicker. POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AINT THE TRUTH, PEOPLE. But that’s not really the main topic of this tread anyway. Homosexuality or whatever. I made it clear that it’s “hetero-sexual sex” that improves a person’s health and body chemistry, and right away some people jumped on that, and didn’t like it. ALWAYS FINDING SOMETHING TO BITCH ABOUT AND POINT TO THAT THEY DON’T LIKE. And missing the overall point. It’s not my fault that straight sex is the ideal for body and mental health. And that masturbation and homosexual sex just isn’t. Some belly-aching pest out there is gonna clamor again for “sources” and “quotes” and whatever. To the annoying twit who said I had “no facts to back up” what I’m saying. Well you ignorant selective non-scholastic closed-minded dope, I QUOTED AND CITED 2 DIFFERENT SOURCES TO BACK UP WHAT I WAS SAYING. I’m not even just referring to that nutritionist website, but that DOCTOR who wrote articles and books in the 1970’s and 80’s. So what are you talking about? Even when I go out of my way to show it and write some of the sources, people still wrongly say “no evidence” or “no sources” or whatever inaccurate see-only-what-they-want-to-see rants and statements. It doesn’t matter anyway. Again I said that I WISH that masturbation was totally harmless and even healthy. Chronic masturbation especially. But it just isn’t so. Which is why I get myself satisfied NATURALLY with the sweet touch of a hot female. As much as possible, and NOT the touch of my own hand. (And definitely not the unnatural touch of some homosexual guy. Wake up.) Ok, now I’m sure all the pests and annoying gnats are gonna fly around here and make uptight responses that I have no more time for. Sorry for the bluntness on my part. Try taking THAT with a grain of salt, and just focus more on the actual points made. Nor-adrenaline, blood fats, DHT, prostate, muscle and nerve differences. And COUNTLESS ARTICLES AND BOOKS ON THE HEALTH BENEFITS OF TOUCH AND HETEROSEXUAL SEX. Believe it. The books and tapes and papers and articles ARE there. And you nuts already proved to me that EVEN IF I PUT THE REFERENCES IN MY WRITING you’ll STILL idiotically say that I didn’t or whatever. So it doesn’t matter anyway. Face reality. The bottom line is: STOP JERKING OFF SO MUCH, EVERY DAY. And get with a woman and get your healthy fill. (And you women, don’t touch yourselves every day either. If you’re in pain then no more than once a week. But no more. Doctors orders. wink)

Common mods, just move this to the PIT, pretty please???

Or even the uncommon mods, for that matter.

While we’re waiting, I can simply add that I’ve proclaimed all sorts of non-mainstream views on this board, from polyamory to neopaganism to, yes, alternative medicine, including herbs and Traditional Chinese Medicine. While I’ve not always been welcomed with open arms for articulating unconventional views, I’ve never, ever, not one single time in two and a half years, had a thread closed on me for content. Never.

Of course, perhaps it’s because I’m fairly articulate, I back up what I can with cites and what I can’t I’m careful to phrase as my own opinion and/or experience. Plus I don’t plagiarize huge chunks of text from nutjob websites.

Your duplicate threads were locked, because they were duplicates. Your original thread was moved to the correct forum. Cecil didn’t write the column in question, it’s a Staff Report. Threads about Staff Reports go in the Staff Reports forum. Your original thread is still there and still active.

This thread is in the wrong forum as well, and it’s also a duplicate, so it may very well get locked or moved to the Pit where people can comment more freely on your posting style.

has anything that I’ve written here, in the thread and responses, anything been ACTUALLY GENUINELY “disproven”? By anything that anybody wrote? Or by you saying “please put it in the pit”? Does that refute logically anything I put forth? Even that registered nurse never actually disproved the stuff about noradrenaline and blood fats increase and being harmful (even if it’s not catostrophically so, but still not the best either). And to answer that nutritionist or herbalist woman, hello, didn’t I already say that not everything that’s put out by nutritionists is gospel truth?? I already said that didn’t I. And I don’t necessarily agree with every single syllable or recommendation on that Resource website either. But there’s some compelling argument and points about penis damage with habitual masturbation over the years. So what? Anyway, nothing I said was actually pointed out as incorrect, with real proof, in black and white, chapter and verse, in exact detail, as it were. So, Uncommon Ignorance, why not put yourself and your rude crap “in the pit”. lol. Bye.

No, it isn’t there anymore. Looks like it got hidden. Thirded to the request that this gets moved to the Pit. Pretty please? I’m going to sprain something, here.

Aren’t there more women then men on these boards? I don’t know the full demographics, but I think there’s enough straight women and gay men that “get with a woman” isn’t going to be a helpful answer.

I can’t find it. I did a search on sweetpoet’s name and only this one and the other locked ones pop up.

You never proved anything so what is there to disprove? Another request for the Pit - is this something we should report to the moderators? Ah well, they say better do it and be wrong than not do it and be right, so I will.

I’m having the hardest time reading Sweetpoet’s posts. Either he refuses to break his posts up into paragraphs, or I’m going blind from too much masturbation.

Seriously, is there a particular type of mental illness which is expressed as “being the only person who knows the truth” about a given issue? We seem to see a lot of these-

  1. They come in, disputing the popular knowledge about something. They alone have access to The Truth.
  2. They back it up with a few sites, generally blogs or other disputable sources.
  3. They have a tendency to post IN ALL CAPS.
  4. They complain about censorship when their multiple threads get locked into one monolithic thread… and then they start making threads like this one, wherein they predict that the thread’s going to get locked because the forum can’t handle The Truth.
  5. Arguments against their screed go ignored- and if you don’t agree with them, you’re part of the establishment and you’re trying to suppress The Truth.
  6. They tend to have a halflife measurable in days- after a few days of furious posting, they abruptly disappear.

I mean, it’s kind of predictable. Is there a particular name for this behavior?

Here’s the way debate works from the 10th grade on:

You make a claim, you back it up.

That’s it. Nice and simple. We don’t have to “disprove” anything you say. Most of what you say can’t be disproven not because it’s true, but because it’s nonsense. Can you disprove that cheese alloys sheep green?

Threads are closed and removed for a reason. Since you have made it clear that you do not intend to follow our rules, goodbye.

Yup. I disagree with some of your views on a personal level, but you never throw them at me with RANDOM CAPS thrown in to emphasize how YOU’re right and the world is WRONG!!!

sweetpoet, go away. You were entertaining for about five minutes. We tried to be reasonably nice to you, and asked you to back up your claims with something. Anything! But no, you come here and ask all of us to prove you wrong? That’s not how this game works, grasshopper. You come in here spouting some weird anti-masturbation and anti-homosexual propaganda, you better be prepared to defend yourself with some actual facts and not just that it’s WRONG because someone said you get PENIS DAMAGE so it MUST be true.

And if you think playing with yourself makes you gay, please leave us, have a gay ol’ time, and get some fresh nose pimples.

Just to be perfectly clear: We are a moderated board, and we require certain behavior standards. One of these is that we frown on plastering the same post in multiple forums and multiple times in a single forum. Another of these is that we don’t use personal insults outside (except in the forum called “the BBQ Pit”.) Another of these is that we try to be nice to each other, which means trying to make our posts easy for others to read: the use of paragraphs and sentences, for instance. And, of course, we don’t copy material from elsewhere.

We are extremely tolerant of a wide range of ideas, but we’re associated with the Straight Dope: mere assertions are not sufficient, we require sources and sites. Thus, when someone shows up here making assertions (and pretty wild ones at that), we require some sort of proof or verification.