Monster104, this is a discussion forum. Stating that something is “complete bull” without giving any reason whatsoever why, or any specific information, is not productive.
Since you don’t give any specific disagreements, here is basically where I’m coming from:
This site talks about some of the passport issues, as well as giving many differing opinions about other parts of the operating system:
This site talks about upgrade difficulties, MSN issues, and the fact that Sim City 3000 does not work with XP:
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/opinion/techtest/ml102501.htm
This site mentions that Kyodai and Battlezone II (I’m not familiar with either of these) run horribly, but Diablo runs smoothly, and Max Payne freezes (although another post mentions this one as running fine). GlQuake and Unreal were reported to run with no problems.
http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/2352.html
This site has some interesting comments:
http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/stories/story/0,10738,2811839,00.html
Specifically, “When push comes to shove, reliability takes precedence over compatibility in Windows XP” - Microsoft’s Mark Croft. I have heard similar information from other Microsoft sources.
This site has a good overview of the issues involved:
http://www.larrysworld.com/articles/lat_xpreview.htm
“The vast majority of programs tested work on XP even if they were written for much earlier versions of Windows or even MS-DOS. There are, however, programs that won’t run properly or at all. Games are especially vulnerable, as are utility and anti-virus programs and CD-burning software, including Roxio’s popular Easy CD Creator.”
The rest is just my own admittedly limited experience with XP, and my knowledge of how the internals of 9.x, DOS, and NT are all put together.
If you have something you specifically disagree with, please give me a little more detail as to why. I re-read my post loooking for any accidental incidences of bovine scatology and did not find any, but would be glad to be shown the error of my ways.