Wisconsin GOP passes union-stripping bill

Let me rephrase that then.

Would you rather a society where a government program helped them or the individual was left to starve?

I think they should be chopped up and fed to their family.

Of course, but then many turned into Trusts, and no, there was no need for a special police force to stop them.

Eh Trolling, or you really are this defective. Hard to tell.

I thought you didn’t deal in “should”.
Bub.

I am less concerned with the whys and wherefores of the stay at this point. The fact that a stay has been issued is good enough for me. I’ll leave speculation to others. I’ll just hold out hope that this will allow enough time for the recall process to complete its work and perhaps change the playing field for a reissue of this bill (read: that it never sees the light of day again.)

Ok. Forget that objection. How do you deal with corporations that wield more economic power than a good sized state?

How does your minimal government keep us safe from other countries whose large governments that take in more taxes and wield more power to regulate allow them more ability to compete?

He thinks he’s mocking people.

How can you tell?

Allow me to make a small edit, please.

“He thinks he’s people.”

It’s so cute!

I had to stop and wipe the tears of laughter away after reading “He thinks”.

Mind saying that in English?

How does your minimal government keep us safe from other countries whose large governments (that take in more taxes and wield more power to regulate) allow them more ability to compete?

Those complex sentences can be tricky.

Assuming Rand Rover isn’t a troll, which is a bit like assuming Paris Hilton is a virgin, it’s quite clear he wants a society where people in unfortunate times are allowed to starve.

A society stripped of the very opportunities for upward mobility via educational assistance, he claims got him the tax lawyer money.

Naw, he just thinks they should count only on being taken care of by professionals doing pro bono work.

oh snap!

What’s your evidence for either of these propositions?

It’s my general conception of you. I’ll tell you what, tell me I’m wrong.

Tell me you believe the unfortunate shouldn’t be allowed to starve. Nor left behind educationally. That there should be government programs to provide a fail-safe for this.

Or even just tell me part of that. If you nitpick “should” without a replacement classifier, then you’re confirming my statement.

TTR, let me ask you this simple yes or no question: do you want the government to enact a new program that gives free cotton candy to every kid on their birthday?

It’s interesting that you’re so unable to think properly, that you think this makes a point.

Do you think cotton candy is a necessity? Do you really like it? Nom!