I’d swear Anne’s hoo-ha winked at me. :eek:
I voted publicity. Her name is in the papers. Her movie premiere got reported. Job well done.
Glabrous. You’re welcome. 
Huh. And people were making a big deal about how close she cut the hair on her head…
If I go down to Safeway and try to snap upskirts of random women I’ll go to jail. Reporters crowd around cars at award shows to chase that elusive upskirt shot and no one cares. How does that work?
Get a press pass before you head to Safeway.
If a reporter had tried to aim a camera under Hathaway’s dress or tried to lift up her dress, I’m sure he’d have been arrested. It’s the fact that Hathaway herself moved in a manner that raised the dress and caused her own exposure that made the shot legal. The legal principle is you can take a picture of anything a person makes public, even if it was inadvertant.
Except her name was going to get into the papers, and her movie premier was going to get reported, even without the upskirt.
I’m not saying it’s proof that this was intentional but your argument doesn’t hold water. I’m sure Hathaway would have received some media attention just for being in a new movie but nowhere near the level that she got for flashing. Amanda Seyfried and Samantha Barks co-starred with Hathaway and were there at the premiere also but you can see how much coverage they received in comparison.
Bald Jerry. BALD!
Well, it was good advertising for the movie, because I just went and looked at the picture, and now I’m less miserable.
Her vulva is the most attractive thing about that outfit. That’s some straight-up fashion victim shit going on there.
I say the only reasonable explanation is to avoid panty lines. The other choices in the poll may apply to a small minority of er, less than reasonable souls, but I think it’s just a simple fashion choice.
Ladies, be they celebrities or PTA moms really should learn how to correctly enter and exit automobiles while wearing a dress, as mentioned above. The slit on Ms. Hathaway’s dress isn’t paticularly severe and if she’d done the “knees together, spin on the derriere” move she’d have had no problem.
Finally, people here are talking like seeing a crotch is akin to Lot’s wife gazing upon Sodom. Jeez. I agree that to purposely flash the beav is fairly tacky and childish, but an *accidental *slip of the lip? Is it really that big a deal?
I think its a health thing-tight thongs/pantys don’t allow air circulation-leading to yeast infections.
The fresh air is good for ya!
I’m not hearing any complaints about it.
Nowt wrong with seeing a bit of clunge.
I like wearing my kilt quite often. To avoid such problems I use a similar product. I wear my blurry/pixelated underwear.
Problem is that shit sticks out 3 foot minimum. If the car or truck doesn’t have an adjustable steering wheel and have seats that go way back its a pain the you know what to get in and drive wearing those babies.
Compact and sports cars are right out.
And thats with the “tighties”!
I can’t even turn a corner walking a sidewalk with the boxer versions.
Post pudenda ergo propter pudenda?
::shoots Chef Troy.:::
Not a jury in the world will convict me! 
Wha? Someone thinks she should have worn skin colored foundation garments under her gajillion dollar designer dress to avoid the possibility of exposing herself. The OP, complete with a poll including attention whoring and possible sexual fetish as motives, is asking for an explanation of why women go without underwear. I know you’re not complaining, ya perv (:p), but clearly some think it’s kind of a big deal.
I hear you can buy those in Japan.