Isn’t the bigger question, why do males have nipples?
Heh. I was waiting for this post. You guys rarely disappoint. 
Having been pregnant, I can attest that’s really where user testing failed. Small item (really small) grows in your body, everything else makes room for it, by virtue of getting shoved the heck out of the way. Small item ends up frickin’ huge, kicks and makes a ruckus. Not to mention peeing every 5 minutes and morning sickness, which lasts all day. And then the little replicant comes OUT.
Miracle of birth my ass. Shoulda tested that one a little longer. Leg hair is least of it.
Maybe we and everythig else on earth is still a work in progress. If he changed everything at once adaptation might be difficult. Come back in 10 or 20 million years and let us know what you think of his current designs.
You’d rather it stayed IN?
Great googly moogly NO! :eek:
So we’re the equivalent of the 8th iteration of Windows?
Just because of the existence of something you don’t like, is not by itself proof that God does or does not exist. I could submit, as proof that there is no God, the existence of Cilantro.
God is not a modern American, so is not beholden to idiosyncratically modern American cosmetic fashions.
Because babies have mommies, ideally, to protect and shelter them until they mature. And children do have leg hair, it’s just not as thick or as coarse as it will be later in life.
Don’t go starting this shit again.
I’m agnostic, but the God I don’t believe in is English-speaking and pro-American.
This one’s explained in Genesis 2. Childbirth originally was painless and perfect – God only reverted to an earlier prototype design as punishment for Eve eating that goddamned apple. (Don’t get me started on why there’s a fucking apple tree in the Garden of Eden to begin with…)
Now, penises – are they considered perfect, or imperfect? When Jews/Muslims seal their covenant with God by chopping off the foreskin, is it symbolic of improving on God’s flawed design? Or a metaphorical statement of becoming less perfect in the sight of God? Clearly, this is the real question for the ages here.
Eh if you include vellus hair then EVERYONE, from fetus to 100+ years old is entirely covered in hair head to toe(well except for lips and foot soles). Seems kinda cheating since it isn’t visible to the naked eye.
Some people LOVE cilantro. Other people think it tastes like soap.
That just shows that He blesses some people and not others. 
But the OP used his own personal taste as the criteria, disregarding my own personal preference for hairy women. So exercised my right to do the same.
So you prefer the left leg?
Also in old paintings of naked people they usually didn’t paint the bodyhair… maybe because it looked better that way - or because it was easier.
Just…just stop.
Why does anyone have hair? Why are you asking this cluelessly inappropriate question?
shaving any part of the body or hair cutting is optional.