I give this OP a “+1” for the thread title alone.
Why do men have leg hair? Is that somehow more sensical than that women do? If so, you are confusing culture with biology.
I had been on the fence about JohnClay for a while, but this thread has convinced me. He has done a fine job of maintaining the suspension of disbelieve for years, but his is beyond the pale.
Leg hair makes men manly. Same with beards. Bearded women probably aren’t seen as attractive no matter what culture it is.
You are incorrect.
BTW if we’re talking about the God of the Bible, culture is very important… I mean in the Bible the first humans were farmers, etc.
Yes my wording of this topic is a bit attention-grabbing but for almost all of my relatives and inlaws it would be relevant… I mean they believe that God is a great designer. Many of them also believe in young-earth “creation science”. (I used to as well)
What about sexual selection? I thought traits that people find sexy would be selected for…
John, God put hair on women’s legs and in their pits for one reason and one reason only. He did it to piss YOU off.
I had a hunch it was true and wikipedia has some cites from anthropologist studies that human body hair is not universally distributed among ethnic groups and “races”.
Funny anecdote but in my wife’s family no one has arm or leg hair, and the men have no chest hair not one.
If God exists and he designed things for a good reason then there are reasons for things like hair. Believers don’t necessarily think we can know his reasoning. BTW in the Bible hair was the source of Samson’s strength and in the NT it says that women should have their hair covered in church.
http://www.thebricktestament.com/epistles_of_paul/instructions_for_womenhttp://www.thebricktestament.com/epistles_of_paul/instructions_for_women/1co11_05a.html
(see also the next two panels)
It says a similar but opposite thing for men:
http://www.thebricktestament.com/epistles_of_paul/instructions_for_women/1co11_04.html
I’m especially pissed off by hair just below the belly button, on the nipples (for women) and on the face.
…have you checked for a penis?
Unless there’s something I missed in the forum policy or membership, complaints to divine beings about design flaws probably need another board.
Yeah, yeah, omniscient, blah. I just have a feeling he/she/it isn’t taking instant action based on this thread.
(Cookie recipe if anyone catches the tv reference)
I don’t expect divine intervention… after all if God existed he allowed the Holocaust - and Job’s troubles. It has something to do with free will apparently.
So: this is your equivalent of “If God is All-Powerful, can he make a rock so big that even He can’t lift it?”
…cuz, that was clear.
Dude, you are performance art. That is all.
See my post #19:
I should’ve seen that the SDMB’s own Joseph Campbell
would’ve pondered the Big Questions already. Sorry I missed it!
My great-grandmother was half-Native American and did not have armpit, leg hair or pubes. My husband is 100% South American Indian and does not have a single armpit or chest hair, has no leg hair below the knee, but does have pubes.
Huh interesting, I thought armpit and pubes on women and armpit and pubes and at least some beard was almost universal on men(seen claims either way that Native American men had none or plucked).