What are the tradeoffs of more intense workouts vs. shorter time between workouts?
I am considering whether to overhaul my workout routine. Currently I have a five-day exercise cycle that alternates cardio with weight training at the gym:
cycling, upper body, cycling, legs & core, rest
(After I got a stent a couple of years ago I put cardio as a higher priority, so that’s not going to change.)
As you can see, I will exercise each muscle group once every five days. These sessions includes multiple sets*. My concern is that five days allows for recovery and then backsliding.
I am wondering if it would be more beneficial to exercise each muscle group more often but with fewer sets. So make each gym session a whole-body workout but just do one or maybe two sets of each lift. My workouts are about an hour, so just combining my current two workouts into one long session would just be too fatiguing for me. (BTW I am 64.) This would be 48-72 hours between workouts, where 48 is usually considered ideal.
I was hoping there would be a factual answer to this but when it comes to exercise you’ll ask 10 people and get 11 opinions, so here we are.
- I do three sets for legs, four for upper body and core. I increase the weight on each set for the first three sets; for a fourth set I leave the weight the same as the third. I set up the weight so I can do 8-12 reps on the last set. On the first set I do up to 12 reps and then increase the weight by about 10% on each set. This is usually to failure on the subsequent sets (unable to complete a rep in good form). If I cannot do at least 8 reps on any set then I reduce the weight for the next set.