Please verify or debunk this anecdote I’ve heard tossed around, usually as an argument that overpopulation is a myth:
Supposedly, every single living person on Earth could fit in the state of Texas and the population density still would be less than that of New York City, i.e. a little crowded but still livable.
Seems hard to believe, but I don’t know where to start with the calculations for figuring this out.
According to Wikipedia, New York City has a population of around 8.1 million in an area of 321 square miles. This is a population density of about 25,000 people.
The state of Texas has an area of 268,581 square miles. If the world’s population of about 6.5 billion were all in Texas, this would be about 24,000 people per square mile.
Note, however, that this doesn’t prove that overpopulation is a myth. New York City is only livable because the rest of the planet is not similarly populated, and NYC can import food, fresh air and water, etc.
There are 268,601 square miles in Texas. If you took the 6.5 billion people on the earth and divide them by 268,601, you get about 24,200 people per square mile. That’s about 128 square yards per person. Unless my math is wrong.
I recently read the sprawl book by Robert Brugemann. The book explains how the entire US population could comfortably live within the geographical boundaries of Wisconsin. Interesting, I thought.
Frankly, my country is sufficiently under-populated that I think we should offer near-unlimited immigration, with only a few major caveats. Thing is, the immigrants will want to live in the existing cities (increasing the social strain), instead of getting all pioneer and building new cities in the sparsely-populated western provinces (which, if history is any guide, will lead to half of them dying off in the first few winters anyway). Oh, well…
From one of those Google results, it looks as though the present population of the Earth could still fit on Zanzibar.
Zanzibar has an area of 650 square miles, or about 18.1 billion square feet.
So that gives each person about 2.8 sq ft, or a square with sides 20 inches long.
It would certainly be a tight fit! Still, I suppose a significant proportion of the Earth’s population is made up of infants, which could be carried, so it probably could be done
Is it still true that the entire population of Earth could fit inside a cube one mile on each side, breathing space not being a factor? I read that when I was a kid but I don’t know if it’s still accurate.
Wow. So the Isle of Wight is smaller than Jacksonville, FL? That’s a place where every person would have a roomy 2 foot square prairie on which to roam.
(I read that fun fact from Marilyn vos Savant.)
But to claim that that proves there is no overpopulation problem is disingenuous. Each person needs a certain amount of space for support, as well as a certain amount of resources.
But these are square feet in two dimensions. For the sake of breathing, could we build up and give everybody and extra couple of cubic yards of air to store their books in?