Would graphene be a suitable substitute for nanotubes?

This grahene stuff. Is it stronger by weight than carbon nanotubes? Is it easier to manufacture? Can it be made economically in volume?

I ask, of course, because of that elusive space elevator that requires a lightweight, superstong material to extend from the ground into outer space. I see it playing a dual pupose: as the actual structure for the elevator and as a capacitor for a space-based solar-powered steam generator. I’m imagining big-assed bricks of this stuff ferrying electricity between the power plant and the top end of the elevator "shaft, and then discharging it through the “shaft” and into our homes.

Or is it not really all that cool?

If you take this stuff and roll it up into a thin tube (as you’d presumably be doing, if you want a one-dimensional fiber like an elevator cable), then what you have is a carbon nanotube.

Graphene is considerably easier to make. I was recently quoted $70 for 1/2 lb of graphene. In terms of chemicals, that is dirt cheap. A half gram of nanotubes (I believe single wall) is $250.

Of course if you neatly organize graphene into a structure for building, you have graphite. I don’t know of any structural utility of graphene. It’s main use will be in electronics.

When I read this, I was quite amazed. Not by the $250 per half-gram price. Rather, I didn’t realize that nanotubes were available commercially at any price. And then, just below your post, I saw this ad placed by the local 'bots:

Science June 19 2009

Behind the wall:

So yes, it is all that cool, even I don’t know about your application.