Would You Be Willing to Eat Cloned Food?

I was listening to NPR today and they were talking about farmers asking the FDA to allow them to sell meat, milk, etc. from cloned animals. The FDA hasn’t quite made up their mind on the matter yet, and NPR interviewed someone from one of the consumer advocacy groups who said that while there probably was no danger from consuming cloned animal products, the reaction of most people to that idea was, “Yuck!” I find that kind of hard to believe.

I can understand people being wary of eating genetically engineered foods, like say, tomatoes with fish genes inserted in them, but cloned animals aren’t all that different than ordinary animals. So, would you do it?

Are you telling me that every chicken actually doesn’t look alike? :dubious:

Sure.

I realized a long time ago that in this day and age I’m far removed from my food to begin with. And what’s more, I don’t really care. As long as it tastes good and isn’t putting me at any (additional) risk, why would I care?

Well, it depends if they’re choked or unchoked.

Presumably the chickens know who’s who.

I’ve never really thought about it, but I don’t guess I’d have a problem with it. You know how when you make a photocopy, and then you make a photocopy of the photocopy, and then you photocopy that, and you keep going while each successive copy gets fuzzier and fuzzier, until you finally end up with something completely unusable that looks nothing like the original? From what I understand, cloning is nothing like that.

Sure. I’d also eat irradiated food. Science is our friend, dammit!

I’m willing to go one step further and demand that we find one perfect specimen of each animal, and then ONLY eat meat cloned from said animal.

At the same time, I am not against genetically modifying an animal to create abovementioned perfect animal.

Or one animal of which each limb is a separate kind of meat.

As long as I get my meat.

I agree with Khadro’s post 100%.

Almost all of the farm raised animals (and vegetables for that matter) today have been genetically modified. You don’t think you could go back 10,000 years ago and find a Rhode Island Red or an Angus cow or even an ear of sweet corn in the wild now do you? They just bred and selected them out the slow way. I am for anything that improves on this process. I have probably eaten something that was an identical twin, a clone, sometime in my life already. So a definite “yes” for me.

And I, for one, welcome our new cloned… meat.

Yeah, I would. But it couldn’t hurt to test it for a year or so, just in case.

Assuming it was made known that it was cloned, no.

I’d like to eat a bubble gum flavored banana.

(Bonus points to whoever can get where that came from.)

I’m not sure it’s such a good idea to make livestock even *more *genetically homogenous. One good outbreak and they’ll be wiped out.

But would I eat it? Sure. It’s just meat. The exact same meat.

If it passes Safety inspection, I don’t see why I wouldn’t. Cloned meat is the same as non-cloned meat.

Slight hijack, but what is the benefit of eating cloned animals?

Although if they can make a pig that makes the world’s most perfect bacon and only 5 calories per thick, delicious slice, I’m all for cloning that pig. Even better if it’s like that pig from the Garden of Eden in The Simpsons. Then we’d only need one.

Otherwise, I’m kinda having a hard time wrapping my brain around the expense involved in cloning an animal only to be on the slaughterhouse floor a short while later.

I eat cloned food all the time: apples, potatoes, onions, grapes, etc.

I would, no problem. In fact I’d go further and would eat some meat cloned in a lab from one of my own cells at least once. Just for curiosities sake.

What a wierd world the future could be.

Now at McDonald’s: McYou Long Pig! You deserve to be ate today![sup]TM[/sup]

Sure, I would, though I doubt it will ever become an issue. I’d guess it’ll always be cheaper and easier to make baby animals the old-fashioned way.