Hey listen, I frequently socialize with people who I couldn’t agree with one bit about politics.
I find that when my conversational counterpart wants to discuss something I know we will never agree on, you simply steer the conversation as quickly in another direction as possible.
You’re not required to agree with everything someone believes in, in order to be sociable and civil.
This happens to me frequently. I’m an atheist and I feel that superstition and organized political entities centered around the un-debate-able imaginings of people are both really bad for society. Yet most of the people around me feel faith is important.
I can either have zero friends, and annoy everyone at all times, and make them dislike atheists that much more than they already do, or I can find common ground, other things to talk about. You’d be surprised, most people don’t care if you’re an atheist as long as you don’t make it an argument that must be had every five minutes. And religious people are just the same as me, provided we’re not having a debate over the supernatural. Take away that one area of disagreement that can’t be bridged, and all of a sudden, we’re both people that can be talked to and socialized with.
I have to work with some folks who are much older than I am, who frequently use outdated racial references. I find it appalling. I don’t condone it. And whenever it comes up, I steer the conversation elsewhere, and I mention that I don’t like those words. They’re not going to change; they’re old and set in their ways. And I have to work with them. I can’t fire them, I don’t have that kind of authority.
And yeah, it’s really offensive to me. And I think it should be a big deal, and I wish I could pick that fight. It’s very important to me.
I think anti-vaxxers are just as socially irresponsible.
The thing is, if you take any group of 100 people, and weed out the anti-vaxxers, the Republicans, the libertarians, the religious folks, the pro-lifers, the pro-gun folks, the pro drug war folks, the folks who use politically incorrect language, and other groups you have beefs with, sooner or later, there’s going to be no one left in that group of 100.
No one.
Being holier than everyone else ignores ones’ own faults, and leaves out a large portion of humanity.
I’ll fight a good fight and debate anyone anywhere anytime. But there are such things as off hours, and work hours, and I don’t feel the need to be constantly at war with everything I find reprehensible about humanity.
Because I realize there’s nothing I can do, as one person, to change humanity, by arguing it down. I can’t argue everyone to my side.
All I can do is be a pro-vaxxer, pro choice, areligious liberal, and also be a decent human being, and hope that this is its own form of persuasion.