As I’m sure we all have, I’ve heard a lot about the terrorists who hijacked the planes for 9/11. One thing I keep hearing though bothers me. It is that they didn’t learn how to land.
This smells of urban legend to me, but I don’t know for certain.
So did the terrorists indeed skip on the landing lessons?
It wasn’t a joke. The terrorists bought time on flight simulators and learned the basics on how to turn the planes, but showed no interest in learning how to land.
Not wanting to learn to land would make sense, however. Landing a plane is more difficult than taking off or normal flight. Even if the terrorists didn’t openly say “skip the part of the class on landing” it seems unavoidable that they paid little or no attention to it.
It’s sort of like people saying: “I don’t have any intention of blowing up a bridge, but I was just wondering, what explosive would you use, how much, and where would you put it?” It’s obviously hypothetical, right? All in the pure pursuit of abstract knowledge?
The reason I am curious is because some friends of mine are upset at the people who trained them, saying they should have known to call the FBI. I say even if it was the case, hindsight is 20/20.
okay, frickin yahoo has decided to suck my choad, so i can’t back up the following contention. take it with a largish grain of salt (about half a lot’s wife) until i can rummage up a cite.
not only have (some of) the flight schools denied the “they didn’t want to take off or land”, but they have come forward and stated (some of) the hijackers specifically requested such lessons.
fwiw, i know one instructor, who informed the FBI beforehand, did say that two of the hijackers seemed uninterested in taking off and landing (which made him suspicious), but that is a far cry from what most media have been trumpeting since shit went down.
Sorry folks, I guess I lose the cite-off. (I can’t find a good reliable one).
What I’m referring to are interviews with the instructor at the Florida flight school which trained some of the terrorists. I think I saw it on the discovery channel.
I did, however, find a cite for jb_farley’s last post:
This doesn’t really debunk my claim, however, because this is a different flight school, and different “students”.
“Moussaoui had enrolled in the Pan Am International Flying Academy in Eagan, Minn., and had paid $8,000 to learn how to fly a commercial jetliner but had expressed disinterest in learning to take off and land.”
I remember a television interview shortly after 9/11 with the owner of the flight school in Venice, FL, who mentioned that the instructors thought it odd that Atta and Al-Shehhi had little interest in learning to take off or land, and much interest in navigation and level flight (the opposite of a normal student). I have no cite for this TV interview, but this story from the Guardian includes:
And Zacarias Moussaoi apparently had the same problem, according to this:
Anything Moussaoui says would have to be highly suspect. He was sloppy in executing his role in the attack, an avowed enemy of the U.S. and now he’s on trial for his life.
So what I’m getting here is that the flight simulation part had the “uninteresting” comment. For the most part though the actual flight part they had to be instructed on how to land.
Yeah, some flight instructor had to say “See that down there? That’s the ground! Now, son, you may not be able to tell the difference between good and evil, but it’s very important you recognize what that brown stuff is.”