WTF? Ex-boyfriend inventory on a Saturday morning? (TMI warning)

I think, guys, that from a women’s perspective, part of the issue might be that we are generally markedly weaker and smaller than any man we might go home with. So we may have concerns about going home with a man that a gay man, being on a much more equitable phsyical footing, might not have to be so concerned about. We’re told incessantly to be damn careful about being alone with a man we don’t know well, with various horror stories and the much higher percentage of male rapists compared to female ones to reinforce the lesson, as well as probably some rather unpleasant encounters with sexually aggressive men who used the superior strength to get what they wanted.

I might talking out of my ass here, but I think that the reaction of Guin and Sue was at least in part an empathic response to what a woman would consider safe in that situation. I mean, the “meet somone on IM and hookup” concerned me too, at first, but I think it is a bit different for gay hookups as opposed to female-male hookups, given the gay men’s most likely equitable physical strength and expectations for sexuality.

At least, this is what I think inspired the “you shouldn’t go home with strange men!” part. I do agree that the extent of “safe sex” lectures in any even vaguely gay thread is sometimes downright amusing. OP: “God I love Streisand!” Next post: “Wear condom when you have sex!” :stuck_out_tongue:

Look, peeps, I’m sorry for the harsh tone-honestly. And I’m not exactly knocking gays or gay sex or even not being monogamous (ho boy, did I mangle THAT spelling, I’m sure!).

I’m just saying that well, I’m a worrier. It’s what I DO. If you think I sound Momish here, you should have heard me chewing out my best friend in high school-the one who always dated losers, accepted rides from total strangers, etc.

Or maybe I’m jealous because I’m going to be 24 years old in a couple of weeks and I’m still, hopelessly, utterly single.

Whatever. I’m just saying-please, be careful! I loves yous guys and I don’t want to hear about your corpse being dragged from the local river.

:frowning:

Poster A: I was drunk, stoned, and snorted poppers and had sex with a guy I’d never seen before in my life.

Poster B: I hope you used a condom.

Poster A: How dare you question my sexuality? I mean, really, etc. etc…

Follows the shitstorm.

Does that about sum up this thread?

Well, he said he had stories up the wazoo…

Which is weird when we already know he doesn’t get…

No. Now go away.

I still think it would have been a much more interesting thread if scott evil had just taken inventory of his ex-boyfriends, as somebody suggested the thread title led them to think. :slight_smile:

(Which, I suppose, ties into his uh, colonic stockpile of memorable anecdotes…)

:slight_smile:

That is a very strange experience, Scott. I think that might make me think twice before deciding to see the guy again, even if on my own turf. You can tell a lot about a person by the people they hang out with, or have been with in the past, and the fact that he had not had the locks changed…that just sends red flags right up the pole, IMO.

Good luck, and let us know what you do find out about the ex, that is, if you ever do.

~V

Back to the original OP, I think Scott should really find out WTF was going on with that ex. What sent a sparkler up his rectum? Any word from your sexy bitch, scotty?

But this probably will digress into another safe-sex lecture from one of the many mothering posters out there, so I suggest Scott give up any hope of trying to get actual feedback from people, as was the intent of this post and 95% of other posts on the Dope. Sorry worrying mothers for trying to ask about the event Scott posted. I’ll stop typing now and allow the anxious many to envelope this post with self-help books like “So You’re A Fag Who’s Going to Hell…” Oh wait, that’s Jack Chick’s newest release…

Oh, matt, you know I love you dearly, but really, were I to recount my tales, it would be the death knell of the four hamsters left running the boards, then would crash the server, then implode the internet. Before you get snarky, babe, let me remind you there’s a lot I’ve not shared. :wink: But thanks for your support in yet another hijacked gay thread.

  • s.e.

All right, I’m sorry I was part of the pile-on. Please forgive me?

In the meantime, I’m among those anxiously waiting to find out what the deal was!

What deal?

God, I’ve already been shot down in a rant about my job. I don’t know if I should even bother.

  • s.e.

Scott honey, don’t tease.

Scott honey, don’t tease.

How you doin’, Guin? :smiley:

Sorry, I suppose the appropriate answer would be:

Me too. :frowning: (not exactly 24, and not two weeks, but close.)

scott: Yes, the reply to this thread has been high on the scale of idiocy. But, be honest, what did you really expect? Every other time you’ve had a thread like this, it’s ended up like this, even the thread about threads like this ending up like threads like this not needing to end up like threads like this because threads like this had ended up like threads like this in the past, so you and every other gay gay who would start a thread like this already know to practise safe sex, and thus making threads like this end up as threads like this is unnecessary ended up like this.*

Were you naively hoping that this thread would be unlike the others, or do you enjoy this sort of thing?

  • Two points if you can figure out what the hell I’m saying.

Scott, if it is any small consolation, I get similar lectures about birth control… from people who weren’t born when I started on the pill. Obnoxious.

Anyway, I’d love to hear the follow-up to your OP, so please don’t spare the details.

Well, speaking only for myself… yeah. I guess I thought that after the first NINETY-FOUR MILLION TIMES we had this argument, maybe some people would have learned something, about scott’s safe sex practices if nothing else

Are we supposed to somehow know (Through divine intervention, I guess) that this issue has come up before with this guy? That saying to him, ‘I hope you’re being safe’ were key-words to him (And others) to launch into a tirade?

Because I never put the two together. I never thought, 'Oh man, the saint of safe sex is getting another lecture again. When will the fools learn that telling Scott to be cautious and be smart will only result in going completely off the handle.’

For me, I didn’t know this guy from Adam when I first opened the thread (And yes, it took about two or three times to read it before I caught, or the implication, that he was gay was clear. Was it before or after the ‘safe sex comment’ made by Pundit? Beats me, but I wish I knew, because it’d help my argument).

The point is, things were going along smoothly in this thing (Including the the safe sex comments) up until you, and a couple others, including Scott Evil, decided to take all kinds of offense and meaning into her comments.

Jesus Christ, it was a simple ‘Hey, I hope you’re safe and all… blah blah blah.’ and then you guys go all ballistic on it saying, ‘Hey, fuck you. I know what I’m doing. Don’t tell me to be careful… blah blah blah.’.

You guys hijacked this thing by going so off the handle over a simple fucking comment. Had it been ignored, or responded to in a manner of, ‘Hey, I’m careful’, I doubt others, including myself, would have felt the need to come in here and say, ‘Hey, mellow out. It’s a fairly common thing, in both the board world and in real life, for people to say things like that, especially when you seem to be proclaiming the virtues of sleeping around with people you just met.’.

That’s what I, and I think some others, were trying to get across, ‘Mellow out you guys. There’s no need to rip into her, and there’s no need to attribute things to her comments that simply weren’t made. Relax’.

Instead, after comments like that, issues of gay bashing, ignorance, and intolerance on our part (Those saying the comments weren’t inappropriate) start flying fast and furious. Whatever.

Go back and read the damn thread. Look at who said what and when. From the start to about post ten or fifteen, if anyone was being intolerant, judgmental, or otherwise assholish, it was you guys, in your attempt to defend against ‘attacks against gays’ from hetero fucks.

Get off your high fucking horse already.

Only when you get off yours.

Did you bother to read anything we said? No where were there discussions of attacks against gays or heteros fucking.

Drink the decaf.

I was going to post earlier but this train has already wrecked, so I guess I’m glad I didn’t.

Because my reaction was kind of an eye-bulging ‘Holy Shit!’ when scott evil was talking about waking up to see someone’s ex-boyfriend taking inventory while he and the dude were sleeping.

And my reaction had nothing to do with safe sex or fucking a stranger, it was more like wondering if scott evil was scared to wake up and see two people stalking around the room.

I probably woulda screamed my head off…

My concern for scott evil is more or less that I hope this ex-boyfriend guy isn’t jealous and dangerous. Would hate to see you harmed by a guy upset about a breakup.

Course this comes from my paranoia of ex’s in general. I’ve been the recipient of a couple of psychotic ranting threatening ex tirades, so I hope you aren’t offended scott.

Chris, you may not have participated in the threads, but this is at least the third thread since the beginning of May in which Scott Evil has posted something about his love life and within a few posts someone has decided he needs a lecture about safe sex. The first time, I saw it as legitimate – it is not inappropriate to bring up the question of whether someone who is admitting to being sexually active knows how to prevent STDs, and the demographics of AIDS and hepatitis suggest that ensuring the awareness of a gay person might be especially appropriate.

The second time was offensive – it’d just been done. This one was over the top, and got jumped. Nobody is insulted by the idea that someone might care enough about an online acquaintance to do what one can to avoid his endangering himself – but is it going to be necessary to add to the FAQ for the board that one agrees to be aware that scott evil practices safe sex, for crying out loud?

If you were not part of the other threads, then there are several people who owe you an apology – but having participated in them, I thought it obvious in this one that the horse was terminally ill already and was still being beaten.