This is the complete description of a video show that was presented to me for broadcasting on our TV station. It’s complete gibberish to me. Quantum physics is more understandable. I’d like to hear interpretations, and I’ll bet that no two are alike.
You probably won’t be able to google it yet, but the source is here (a web page under development).
Here we go:
Must I be stoned to make any sense out of this?
I flashed on the scene in Animal House where the 3 students are smoking pot with Donald Sutherland’s professor character, discussing how one atom can contain an entire universe. Wow, man!!
Sounds like high-grade woo…
I am stoned. Sounds like new-age woo to me.
Wow. I’m actually a fan of new-age woo, but that sounds flakier than … no, I’ve got nothing. Nothing flakier than that.
But I desperately want to watch an Asylum/Syfy original movie called “Astral Horror.”
It’s become entirely too easy to make videos.
Time Cube: The Video
Hmmm. What is the difference between high-grade and low-grade woo? There must be something we can go on; a test, maybe?
Low-grade woo is demonstrably false. High-grade woo is more subtle.
High Grade Woo is made from fine material, while Low Grade Woo is made from coarser material. It’s really that simple :rolleyes:
I tried entering that block of text into Google translate. It said, “English Detected,” so I have my doubts about Google’s translation skills. Maybe it’s lowland woo. In French, it sounds better (but everything sounds better in French):
Low grade woo is patently recycled bushwah. High grade woo is new and more entertaining on at least one level, being made from fresher ingredients.
There is no new woo. It’s the same old woo, repainted and repackaged.
I’m pretty sure I saw that episode of Doctor Who. I think it was the season where Christopher Eccleston played the Doctor.
Well then where the heck are my keys, huh?
It’s about ghosties and goulies and long legged beasties. And things that go bump in the night.
Or woo, if you will.
Hell, just air the thing. Maybe one of the viewers will figure it out. 'Course, they’d have to be stoned *themselves *to want to watch it.
Seems to be something about the soul surviving after the body is gone, 'cause of energy patterns imprinted in the fabric of the universe or something.
Puff, puff, pass.
Wouldn’t want to get the reputation of an “all-woo” channel. Or maybe there’s an untapped market. I do have air time to fill at 2AM. Or 3AM. 4?
<<Everything is energy and no energy can ever be lost.>> But it can transform into an unusable form of energy.
<So everything that is emitted by a person is recorded> No. Everything that is emitted travels outward until absorbed by something that it hits. Also what a person emits is infrared radiation. Not all that exciting. (OK, there’s also Bioelectromagnetics, but that’s not technically an emission, unless you’re an electric eel.)
< – in the soul, in the coarse-material and finer-material cosmoses.> The soul and 2 cosmoses must have been defined (or just spoken of loosely) outside of any science that deals with energy. (And there’s no evidence of anyone’s bioelectric field being recorded anywhere.)
<And, since these inputs are combined with huge energy fields of the same kind,> Also a non-science statement. There are no known energy fields absorbing human-emitted infrared or any other form of human emissions. (Electric fields influence one another, and birds may navigate via sensing the interaction of the earth’s magnetic field with their biofield, but influencing is not combining and especially not recording.)
< the people who helped form these fields are in constant communication with them - not only during their life on earth but also the souls in the beyond.> Reminds me of The Grapes of Wrath.
<This and more are the works of the individual person, works that follow him…[end]> I like the way Steinbeck said it better. Misusing the words ‘energy’ and ‘emitted’ and ‘input’ or, rather, using them for purposes of decoration, to make a statement sound sciency, does not improve the basic idea of “I’m not going to be completely gone when I die” or “I’m not really alone”.
Yllaria, you took the words right out of my mouth. But isn’t it obvious?