WW2:Battleships and air attack

The recent thread about the Japanese in WW2.Which also spun off into Carrier vs Battleship rivalries set me thinking.

Was there ever a case where a battleship was sunk by air action alone?

So not when:

  1. A suprised sitting target. Like at Taranto and Pearl harbour.

  2. Without proper support from destroyers and cruisers to thicken the air defenses.Like the Yamamoto.

  3. Without decent air cover.Like the sinking of the Prince of Wales and the Repulse.
    In short when ready for battle , able to maneuver , part of a well-rounded fleet , and with reasonable fighter support.

The German battleship Tirpitz (sister ship to the battleship Bismarck was sunk exclusively by air action. IIRC a Japanese battleship (or two) met similar fates at the hands of aircraft but I’m not 100% certain.

That’s Yamato; Yamamoto was the Jap’s top admiral in the first year of the war. I don’t recal how many escorts she had, but her sister Musashi was with a large force of batleships, cruisers and destroyers when she sunk by numerous bomb and torpedo hits from US carrier aircraft (she fired enormous “shotgun” anti-aircraft shells at them). Promised air cover never arrived, so no, I can’t think of any examples of battleships with decent fighter cover being sunk solely by aircraft.

The Prince of Wales and Repulse were caught with their pants down near Singapore and were sunk by Japanese warplanes. I think they both went down within two hours, although the did do a fairly decent job of beating off the first waves of attacking planes.

The Royal Navy was also badly mauled by the Luftwaffe while trying to prevent a German naval landing to follow up the airborne invasion of Crete. The Warspite was present for that action and was seriously damaged, but it survived. However, at least one U-boat was also on the scene, so it wasn’t entirely an air v. naval confrontation.

Oh, good lord, I swear I read the OP, I really did!

The Tirpitz fails on points 1) and 2) as for 3) i’m not sure what resistance the Luftwaffe put up.

The point i’m enquiring after is that the Battleship is supposed to have been shown up as meat on the table by what happened to them in WW2.But when employed as they were supposed to be.To quote myself:-

… when ready for battle , able to maneuver , part of a well-rounded fleet , and with reasonable fighter support.
Did any battleships ever go down to air attack alone?

I should note that the Tirpitz was at anchor when it was sunk. I have no idea what defenses were surrounding it but I would hazard a guess that a ship underway is a harder target than one standing still.

Okay, my posts keep getting eaten. I’ll try one more time, highly abbreviated. Here is a breakdown of all sunken post-dreadnought battleships that I could find, by nation. I highly recommend that you check my work, because I don’t entirely trust it myself.

United States

Two battleships, Arizona and Oklahoma, were sunk at Pearl harbor. Others were badly damaged and refloated, but no further battleships were lost by the U.S. in the course of the war.

Japan

Ten battleships total were lost. Three were sunk in port at Kure in July, 1945. Three were lost in night surface actions (Savo Island III and Surigao Straight). One was lost to a British submarine. Three, Hiei, Yamato, and Musashi were caught by American aircraft in the open sea, Hiei after it was damaged in a nighttime surface engagement. Of those, only Musashi was sailing with a large fleet, and even she sustained most of her damage after she fell out of formation.

(A third super-dreadnought, Shinano was converted to an enormous aircraft carrier and sunk by an American submarine during its tryouts.)

Italy
One battleship, Conte di Cavour, was sunk at Taranto, re-floated, and sunk again at Trieste after falling into German hands. Another, the Roma, was sunk by German glide-bombs as the entire Italian fleet made its way to Malta to surrender to the Allies. Aside from Musashi, Roma may be the only example of a well-protected battleship going down to air attack.

Britain

Royal Oak was sunk by Gunther Prien’s U-47 inside Scapa Flow. Hood, a battlecruiser, was lost in a surface action. Barham was sunk at sea by U-331. Prince of Wales and the battlecruiser Repulse were of course sunk near Singapore by Japanese aircraft.

Germany

Bismark was lost to combined surface and air action. Tirpitz was sunk by aircraft while docked. Battlecruiser Scharnhorst was sunk in a surface action. Gneisenau was scuttled in 1945, still unrepaired from damaged sustained by air attack in 1942.

France

Ocean was captured by the Germans and bombed so badly in port that the Germans scuttled it a week later. Bretangue was sunk by British warships at Mers-el-kebir in 1940. Light battleship Strasbourg was sunk by Allied planes in 1944 in port. Clemenceau, though incomplete, was floated by the Germans, and the hulk was subsequently sunk by allied bombers, 1944.

So to sum up, here are the final results of World War II, unless I’ve omitted something:

[ul]
[li] Sunk in port by aircraft: 11 (counting incomplete ships and the eminently sinkable Conte di Cavour twice)[/li]
[li] Sunk in port by surface ships or submarine: 2[/li]
[li] Sunk by submarines at sea: 2 (3 including Shinano)[/li]
[li] Sunk exclusively by surface ships at sea: 5 (Hood, Scharnhorst, Fuso, Yamashiro, Kirishima)[/li]
[li] Sunk by combined surface and air: 2 (Hiei and Bismarck)[/li]
[li] Sunk exclusively by aircraft at sea: 5 (Yamato, Musashi, Prince of Wales, Repulse, and Roma.)[/li][/ul]

Of the five battleships sunk exclusively or near-exclusively by aircraft, only two, Musashi and Roma were in large formations that provided anything close to effective AA protection. None were sunk in the presence of a fleet with aircraft carriers, as best I can tell, but I suspect that one can argue that the carriers became the primary targets in that situation.

I’d like to see how many battleships and battlecruisers were damaged by aircraft, but that’s a much more difficult task. Anyway, it looks like a battlship was safest in a combined arms, three-dimensional setup at sea, and most endangered while sitting in port.

I don’t remember the details, but didn’t the British lose a battleship or destroyer during the Falklands War due to an Exocet missile that caused the aluminum superstructure of the ship to catch fire and the thing burned down to the waterline?

The British didn’t have a battleship to lose in the Falklands. They lost the Sheffield and Broadsword, I can’t recall what class they were. They may have been destroyers. They lost several frigates, all named “Sir - somethingorother”, and a big cargo ship.

I would also say that when battleships were part of a large fleet, they were not the primary targets of attackers.

Tucker, that was a destroyer.

hijack/
According to this quite interesting site, apparently a compilation of every ship sunk (in the world?) by air attack since WWII,
in the Falklands War the Bitish lost:
HMS Sheffield - Type 42*
HMS Ardent - frigate
HMS Antelope - frigate
Atlantic Conveyor - container ship
F4 - landing craft
HMS Sir Galahad - LST (landing ship - tank)

*according to this site an area air-defence destroyer
In the first link I noted a Japanese trawler sunk when a Russian plane dropped a cow on it!

Yojimboguy, I have heard about that last incident; I am almost certain it is an urban legend

Snopes thinks so too, Incubus.

Well, come to think of it…

…any properly equipped, fully manned and well commanded capital ship would stand a good sporting chance. Specially an armored one.

But IIRC the concept of “a well-rounded fleet” was not well developed at the start, specially the “reasonable fighter support” bit. Many retained a Dreadnought-era mentality with the battlewagon being a strategic weapon that could command the sea by itself. You’d even have "raider’ missions where one big bad battleship was expected to wreak havoc on the sea lanes all by herself.

What WW2 really killed off was the idea that the BB in and of herself was THE key asset that decided battles. This in turn was taken to mean it was no longer cost-effective.

The OP sort of begs the question with the “reasonable fighter support” as if the battleship was sank, the fighter support wasn’t quite reasonable enough now was it.

Battleships were easy pickings in most fleet actions. Big and slow, with armor in the wrong places, when the aircraft went after them they tended not to do so well. In WWII it could be argued that their most effective use (other then the early British v. German fleet scuffles) was as commerce raiders (German) or shore bombardment (U.S.)

The reason even more were not sunk is that they were not really as important a target as any carrier which happened to be around. The Big Sticks of the war were the carriers, as the Battleships could not defend themselves well from the air attacks of carriers or shore based air craft.

By reasonable fighter support i just mean that there was actually some form of air cover. Friendly Fighter planes overhead when the enemy turned up so the attackers didn’t have a free hand.