I didn’t want to speak specifically to anything in Wyoming at the time I posted, but at the same time I didn’t want to rule it out, based on some of the reports coming in. I know from experience in “blue machine states” that it’s fairly easy to play games with absentee ballots. I don’t know if the high percentages of surrogate votes reported in Wyoming are outside the norm there, so I’ll wait to see if more info comes out.
I admit my perception could be skewed by living and working in some of the most corrupt places where the Dems hold sway. I’m happy to hear there are places where Dems hold to higher standards.
The error — first uncovered by The Denver Post — was shared with rival Hillary Clinton’s campaign by party officials but kept from Sanders until the Post told his staff Monday night.
The mistake is a minor shift with major implications. The new projection now shows the Vermont senator winning 39 delegates in Colorado, compared to 27 for Clinton.
Of course, mistakes happen, human error, blah, blah, blah, but this kind of thing doesn’t exactly inspire trust.
camille: I’m not sure the party correcting a mistake on its own accord in order to give Sanders more delegates is the killer example you’re searching for.
No, my point was that they are towns. With colleges (albeit smaller ones).
The student population of those schools is less than 10% of Cheyenne or Casper’s population. They are just small community colleges whereas the number od students at UWyo are 40% of Laramie’s residents.