Bullshit. Nobody requested starving to death.
When eutanasia of sick and dying animals is concerned, every person with an IQ higher than room temperature realizes that killing the critter is the human thing to do.
Just having some one say, after the fact, that they did a humane thing by drowning or poisoning a cat, when the critter was not sick or dying, actually raises a different red flag to me: IIRC people who commit acts of cruelty toward animals many times don’t stop there.
Rats carry disease and are a threat to human life. Idiot.
Change the law then, you American hater.
Then again, the same goes to you, you numbnuts[sup]5[/sup]
Cats can carry rabies.
Yes, and obviously there would be a need to kill a rabid cat in the interest of safety. The cats he kiled, were not rabid. He’s just a sadist.
What? Your comment makes no sense. Starving a human being to death is evil. Laws and court rulings notwithstanding.
SAVE THE FERAL CATS, though. Gotcha.
[QUOTE=Crafter_Man]
Are you stupid, or is it just an act? Regardless of your asshole opinions, it must be clear to you from this thread that Guinistasia is not alone.
You couldn’t care less that you might be killing a beloved pet? Aside from the fact that you are a sick fuck who takes pleasure in torturing animals, it is becoming increasingly clear that you have little compassion for members of your own species. You’re not worth the piss it would take to drown you.
Wrong.
Wrong again.
Well, you are not scary to me at all. You’re a fucking bully who compensates for his feelings of inadequacy by killing creatures who are 1/25th your size and then crowing about it. I shit bigger turds than you before breakfast.
I would humbly suggest that nobody respond to mil, as he’s a hijacking moron without enough neurons to rub together and make a spark.
Of course it is, but context, context, context, starvation is the result now of her decision not to accept feeding tubes, the courts of America have decided that her decision was that one.
Now, if it were me, Euthanasia should be considered in cases like this one, so starvation would not be one of the outcomes of a decision like this one.
Good to see that you are learning hijacker[sup]6[/sup]!
No, but I can ask that they not hijack my discussion into something unrelated.
Guin, methinks if you ignore him he’ll go away. DNFTMoron.
Related question:
Why do you think feral cats are more worthy of consideration than human beings?
Now that was a very hijacking simulpost Guin!
:: says hi at Guin :: 
To be a related question, you have to quote where did she said that.
[sub]And to think that you said I was the one that made no sense[/sub]
Let’s see. She said drowning feral cats is evil, but her position in the Schiavo case indicates that starving human beings is A-OK. I disagree. Deal with it.
Would you take it to the goddamn Schiavo threads? I already stated-I am NOT talking about it here. Deal with THAT.
Let’s see, as for me, I dealt with that in post #172. Not only you are not making sense now, you are not reading posts, maybe you need glasses.