Given that you read a 500 page book of hearsay reports of UFOs, I’m not sure you’re in any position to point fingers.
So, wait, you actually scoff at James Randi, et al?
Dude, what are you even doing on a site such as this?
Considering that you haven’t even browsed the book, you’re not in any position to comment on the matter, are you?
Pwned.
If this thread had a muffler, it’d be orbiting the moon right about now.
I was totally unaware that being a Randi fan was a neccessary addition to my resume.
See post above yours. Pwned back at him.
Um, no. At least, not according to anybody who isn’t you.
Question for astikov: How many times, and how furiously, have you masturbated since starting this thread?
Conflicted. Can I recognize that Randi does some useful things while still acknowledging that he is a utter prick?
Um… that’s a rather personal question? Is this line of enquiry going anywhere specific?
Course you can. That is along the lines of my own opinion.
Oh, dear. Time to review.
I also feel the same about Mick Jagger. Is that a problem too?
Randi isn’t a prick at all, really. He’s not mean to random believers in woo, and he’s generally a pretty polite person.
He does, however, go after frauds and charlatans, people actually doing the exploiting. You might hear some harsh words from Randi directed at some naturopath who told someone to stop taking their chemotherapy and stick bark up their ass instead and assume that he feels that way towards all believers in woo, but from what I can tell he’s polite to the rank and file non-exploiting idiots.
Could be right, I’ve not paid that much attention to him. Given the evidence in post #372, I’m inclined to revise my opinion.
That’s right…use any technique whatsoever to dismiss those many, many, many people who think you’re full of shit.
The latest in naturopathy is to stick the whole entire dog up one’s ass.
How many is that then? Hey, I know! Why don’t you start a poll?
Actually, that’s a good idea.
Stand by…