Jester said that “(a)ccording to Christianity, God gave us free will. FREE will. Meaning that we could do whatever the Hell we wanted, but we’d be judged by our actions in the end. Meantime, he’s there to lend a helping hand, to offer support for suffering people, and maybe even throw a miracle or two into the mix. But he can’t just stop the damn plane from hitting the building. That would violate free will.”
That sounds good, but I was under the impression that that certain Bible verses intimate a more deterministic existence for His creations. If the Judeo-Christian God is an actual, empirically functioning entity as His followers claim, His actions, along with the “reality” He has created, are fraught with just these sorts of paradoxes. How any reasonable person can adhere to the inherently self-contradicting Christian paradigm of God is beyond me.
Presumably, at least two passengers aboard the doomed aircraft(s) prayed “in His name” for some sort of divine intervention. “Whenever two or more are gathered in His name, etc…” Isn’t that the claim? They were ignored, of course. What can we learn from this? Petitionary prayer doesn’t work, or at least that petitionary prayer doesn’t serve the function it is presumed to serve. Think about it: an omnipresent, omniscient, all-benevolent diety isn’t going to take requests, isn’t going to alter His preordained agenda.
Also, keep in mind that, in the Old Testament, God intervenes with humankind on a near constant basis, slaughtering thousands on a whim, killing individual O.T. characters for ridiculously mundane reasons (in Kings II, I believe, one of the prophets, after being mocked as a “Baldy-Head” by a group of school-children, convinces his loving, “judge not lest ye be judged” God to have them mauled and eaten by a bear), enacting miracles left and right, and generally acting as inspiration for a marching, maurading atrocity machine.
We can’t have it both ways.