Machinaforce? Your thesis eludes me. I don’t know what you want to say or talk about.
I do confess I didn’t bother trying to hard to understand the blobs of quoted text in the OP, but in my defense, it said “All words are false, including my own.” When somebody says that to me I’d be a fool to listen to them, wouldn’t you agree? It’s false.
As for I are awareness and such, I dunno about you, but I am a body which includes a brain upon which my consciousness runs as a computer program. It’s not that complicated. I mean, it’s more complicated than, say, a toaster, but it’s not that hard to understand.
Brainwanking is fun and all, but at the end of the day, no matter how certainly you can convince yourself that “solid” objects don’t exist except in your mind as perceptions, your awareness of shit will change dramatically when you ram the motorcycle you perceive yourself to be riding into one. So what, apart from a sticky mind, does the brainwank really get you?
The best I can tell (and this is being generous) is the finger pointing to the moon. Like how there is nothing catlike about a cat, it’s just what we agree to describe a cat as. But even still, no matter what you call something doesn’t change the interactions with anything else. That’s my best guess.
So let me back up a step. Please correct me if this sentence is wrong:
The links/quotes you posted in the OP of this thread don’t make sense to you, and you posted them here in the hopes of getting us to explain them to you in a way that makes sense and/or transmogrifies them into something that is useful to you in your life.
If the above sentence is accurate, then it must be a bit annoying how we’re all laughing about how they don’t make sense and aren’t useful in life.
Also, if you want us to explain things to you (presuming you do), it would probably help to mention that you’d like aid in interpreting the thing.