Your political beliefs and why.

We’ve had threads like this before, but not in a little while, and they were pretty superficial. Just asking people to state their beliefs but not why. I want to know. Are you an anarcho-syndicalist tree-hugging Samoan Nationalist Pat Buchanan supporter simp[ly because your parents were? Or is there some deeper reasons for your beliefs. I think it will help us all understand each other better. And give people a good point of reference on why posts look the way they do.

Me first.

I’m a socialist.
I started out as a liberal cause my parents were soft liberals, and I grew up in a liberal colledge town (Davis). I moved to Wisconsin and became a moderate Republican. I even worked for them as a telemmarketer. It seemed like complete bullshit to me, especially Tommy Thompson. I fiddled with libertarianism for about a month. Then I went and became a Green. I even voted for Ralph Nader, and I worked for an environmental PAC in Wisconsin. My opposition to the death penalty caused me to work with socialists. I then joined the ISO, and became more and more socialist. The more I read, the more it makes sense to me. One of the best books was by Georges Sorel, it was called Reflections on Violence. I also became more convinced of my beliefs through activism. Being gassed and beaten by the cops when you’ve done nothing wrong is a great educational lesson.

So who’s next.

I’m pretty liberal. But then I don’t believe in capitol punishment or abortion, and I think you should have to have some manner of intelligence before you can buy a gun.

I also think there are entirely too many things where it can depend on the person. Such as gun control. But you can’t make little exceptions in every law.

So what political party do I side with? I don’t know. Neither of the big candidates is terribly pro-life.

I’m a libertarian who, oddly enough, finds himself disagreeing with almost everyting Libertarian says on these boards. I’m a die-hard civil libertarian, but I’m very moderate economically. Let’s legalize drugs, gambling, and prostitution and then see about abolishing the IRS.

Why? Well I was a Limbaugh Republican for many years before realizing how much the religious elements in the party disagreed with me, and how hypocritical their economic policies were. My stepfather was a Libertarian and had a bunch of literature about it around (not to mention Ayn Rand books). There were (and are) a lot of things in the official party line that bother me (privatized police force? gimme a fuckin’ break), but mine is a message vote. Nothing more.

I’m all over the place. I’m very “conservative” about issues that affect everyone in the country as one entity (military, guns, etc), but I’m very liberal about issues that affect people on an individual level only (can’t see how gay marriage will hurt in any way). Also, I like to keep a realistic outlok on stuff (abortion: Don’t like it, and wish it wouldn’t happen, but I know and accept that people are gonna make mistakes, so all you Pro-choicers can go nuts).

When it comes to social issues, I am generally quite Liberal. I am pro-choice and generally in the school of thought that people can do what they want as long as they are adults and not infringing ont he rights of others. I feel strongly enough about some of these key issues that I align myself as a Libertarian (though to be fair, this has as much to do with dissatisfaction with the two major parties as anything else).

In spite of my liberal views, I myself am quite conservative in how I live my own life believe it or not.

At the same time, I find myself to lean on the conservative side when it comes to international policies, like how we deal with other countries and the military. I liked the Gulf War. I don’t care that it was about oil - I like cheap oil and I don’t like tyrants. I am glad we have a good military and always wantt to have one.

At the same time, I mix up the above as often as not. I am against Anti-Hate crime legislation, for example, but I also am all for nuclear weapon limitations as well.

That said, I am for the death penalty in theory (I’m all for revenge) but I doubt our ability to do it in practice to my satisfaction so I wind up arguing against it more often than not, but I am also for gun control measures (but not the banning of guns0 and I find myself arguing both sides of that issue.

I generally find myself getting equally as pissed off with the draconian measures the far Right preaches as I do the mealy-mouthed whining of the bleeding-heart left. That said, I love PJ O’Rorke and Bill Mahar. I hate racism, but I refuse to use the words “African’American” or any other bows to political correctness.

I guess you can call me an issue-oriented centrist?


Yer pal,
Satan

[sub]TIME ELAPSED SINCE I QUIT SMOKING:
Four months, six days, 35 minutes and 3 seconds.
5120 cigarettes not smoked, saving $640.12.
Life saved: 2 weeks, 3 days, 18 hours, 40 minutes.[/sub]

"Satan is not an unattractive person."-Drain Bead
[sub]Thanks for the ringing endorsement, honey!*[/sub]

I am the epitome of moderate. Everyone says that, but it’s really true in my case.

I’m a libertarian in the sense that I want a minimalist government. I could elaborate on what I mean by that, but it would be loooooong. I, too, disagree with a lot of what Libertarian says on this board, though he seems to define libertarianism around here, probably because of the monniker. I’m yet to see a candidate of the Libertarian Party who wasn’t a flake or a whacko. But I’m closer to the Lib philosophy than either that of the liberal left or conservative right, although the major party candidates tend to be more moderate and so generally less noisome to me than the Lib Party. But in a broader sense, I spit on the Democrats. I hack and spit on the Republicans, all the while regretting that I didn’t think of hacking before spitting on the Democrats a moment ago, too.

I have a whole slew of government principles-of-operation and programs that are eminently reasonable but unforgivably moderate; they have something for everyone. Therefore the only way they will ever be enacted is if I am given dictatorial powers to crush all opposition beneath the heel of my iron boot. I need backers. Who’s with me?!

Whenever election time rolls around, I say to myself, “If I vote for the Democrat guy, I’ll lose my gun rights, but if I vote for the Republican guy, I’ll lose my abortion rights.”

Then I go out and club a baby seal or dump a refrigerator-full of CFCs into the ozone layer or have sex with a cadaver while standing inside a pentagram, just to piss them both off.

I am an extreme leftist, so extreme, in fact that I am probably closer to, say, Barry Goldwater, than to the nearly identical tickets of Bush, and Gore.

No nation as rich as the US should be willing to cut its taxes a single penny while a single child is hungry, or ill clothed, or ill educated within its borders. Lets feed everyone under a hundred pounds for free as a kick off, and educate everyone who cannot write a coherent essay explaining why he no longer needs to be educated. Mass transit will not serve the masses unless it goes where the masses live, where the masses work, and cost the masses nothing to use. You don’t have to pay anyone to collect and count the money, either.

I can see no legitimate reason that the government should have any information on the insides of its citizens. The content of my blood, uterus, genes, jeans, sexual organs, or anything inside my skin seems to me to be beyond the purview of any reasonable inquiry by the government. None, ever, for any reason, without the direct order of a court, which has been shown good cause to believe that such will provide evidence of a crime, and that crime cannot be any matter of the content of my body, or the non-violent activities I practice with it.

If we want a law saying the speed limit should be 25 miles an hour, then 26 miles an hour is illegal. If we don’t want to have that law, OK, but we don’t need laws we ignore. Second offense traffic violation should involve required suspension of license to drive, and third offense should require lifetime revocation of same. Driving without a license should require seizure of all automobiles, and prison sentence. Or, we could make the whole matter one of tort law, and require “flight recorders” like in airplanes. That way we know who loses every dime they ever had when the “accident” was caused by “diver error.”

Whatever we think our citizens owe our government in terms of service should be identical for every citizen. While I support the contention that conscientious objectors to war have the right to refuse that particular service, it would seem to me that each citizen, in war, and in peace should make some public service to the nation as a whole. That service should be compensated, but at a standard rate, while the citizen serves, and his or her position in the community should be preserved during that service. (An emergency response force of a million young people maintained in trained, and deployed units could eliminate great amounts of suffering in peace time, and will have the logistical and teamwork aspects of military training already accomplished if a general call to arms is needed.)

I suppose I must expect that Practicing Law for Profit is never going to be declared a crime, however obvious it is that such a thing ought to be impossible, and is certainly unsavory. OK, so I loose on that one, but certainly Practicing Law for Profit should permanently disqualify anyone from holding legislative office. The conflict of interest is clear. Lawyers should not be permitted to do both.

I oppose capital punishment, because whatever it seems it ought to be, or do, is certainly nothing at all like what it actually is or does. I make an exception in this area for those who engage in deliberate malfeasance of elected office. This is Treason, and should be a capital offense. In the case of politicians, the concept of deterrence can reasonably be expected to work. Hang a few dozen, and watch the Era of Good Government begin. (We have to forgo the current crop of scoundrels because of the doctrine forbidding ex post facto law.)

Personally, I am opposed to any law financially aiding the rich. They don’t need help, they’re rich. I consider half of the citizens in the United States to be rich. I don’t think we should tax the poor. They don’t have any money, on account of being poor, and what they need is money, so taxing them seems pointless in both regards. This means that the lower third of the nations populace is pretty much not going to be able to pay much in taxes. Which means the upper two thirds are going to have to pay it. I see no reason not to tax the rich more than the poor, after all, they are rich, and even if we tax them out of being rich, they are going to be well off.

I think we ought to either outlaw campaign financing entirely, or tax the hell out of it, say 45 percent. Make everyone go on channel 134, and have it run all day and night. Politicians will have to say something worth listening to if they want anyone to flip from Baywatch Nights to “the Campaign Channel.” Pay for it with the campaign finance tax.

Let’s educate nurses, technicians, and doctors in large enough numbers that doctors no longer need to be given the wealth of small nations to practice. Make the delivery of medical serves a community matter, and the maintenance of the infrastructure for the public medical needs the only portion of medical care in which government need intrude. That means a lot of doctors earning salaries, and a lot of Medical Schools facing the fact that heredity should be studied by the biology department, not the admissions committee.

Separate Church and State, it’s good for both of them.

Legalize all drugs, including those currently only pushed by the AMA. Lots of drug users will die. They are already dying. Provide sterile single use injectable heroin, cocaine, and every other recreational drug at cost in any pharmacy for anyone who is of age. You can’t drive around the schools in a BMW selling nickel a hit cocaine. Educate people, and face the fact that some of them are going to kill themselves with drugs. At least they won’t have any particular reason to kill anyone else.

Hey, it won’t happen, don’t worry.

Well, I should stop now.

Tris

Louis Brandeis, my favorite Supreme Court Justice (I suppose I agree with a lot of what Tris said. Furthermore…

I’m the type of person that has a favorite Supreme Court Justice), sums up the core of my political belief with the following quote:
“We can have a democratic society or we can have the concentration of great wealth in the hands of the few. We cannot have both.”

For specifics, I’ll reiterate some of the views I posted on the last thread of this nature… To wit:

[ul][li]I’m a progressive populist, with strong egalitarian tendencies.[/li][li]I think the advent of consumerism precipitated a decline in civics.[/li][li]I feel it’s important to examine the institutional interests vested in the status quo.[/li][li]I think Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt are the shining stars of their respective parties.[/li][li]I believe American politics has been bought and paid for by corporations.[/li][li]I don’t think we’ve got anything close to a level playing field.[/li][li]I think the IMF is a good idea that got hijacked by liberal developmentalist excesses.[/li][li]Similarly, I think that the WTO threatens national sovereignty in the name of free markets.[/li][li]I don’t believe we should abandon public schools or the inner city.[/li][li]I think the War on Drugs is a waste of time, and mandatory minimums are implicitly racist.[/li][li]I see low voter turnout as a boon to entrenched interests.[/li][li]I believe in the social contract.[/li][li]I think the three keys to government and corporate integrity are responsibility, accountability, and long-term vision.[/li][li]I wish Jefferson had kept the original draft of the Declaration of Independence.[/li][li]I think Al Gore’s falling far short of filling his father’s footsteps. (And I indulge, apparently, in gratuitous alliteration. grin)[/li][li]I want to thank George Bush for putting David Souter on the Bench, because he’s the only liberal left.[/li][li]I believe that individual self-interest should sometimes be subsumed by the societal good. (Alliteration; can’t stop!)[/li][li]I believe understanding history is the key to shaping a better future.[/li][li]I think there’s more than two sides to every issue.[/li][li]In fact, I don’t think anything is ever as simple as people make it out to be.[/li][li]I believe that every viewpoint is anchored to an implicit valuation, and that what passes for “objectivity” is most often the position of conventional wisdom.[/li][li]I think we should question every one of our assumptions; the better to strengthen our world-view.[/li][/ul]

That’s about what I think.

Gak.

The first few lines should read:

Preview didn’t catch that scramble, consarn it.

I belive that greed is a bad motivating factor. Yes, it is good for motivation, but it is bad for society in general.

We all need to live in a home and eat.

I can’t trust the things that this nation is built on and needs to survive to greedy private hands. Health, education, and mass transit need to be publicly owned. And the people need to have a stake in it.

I dont think haveing lots of money should change things one way or the other in politics. Therefor, all campaigning should be limited to public TV (where all candidates can get equal time), public radio, a series of well run debates and the government sponcered Internet sites.

I think that workers need strong representation, maternity leave (for both sexes) and European style paid vaction. Read the book “The Overworked American”, for justification.

Keep your hands off my body. That means any consentual sex, abortion, drug use etc. is my business, not yours. The best way to battle social ills is through education and not haveing desperate people with no oppertunties in our nation.

Which meant that there is a lot of inequality in this nation. Too many people start out with too many strikes against them. That anyone can be the president of the United States is the biggest lie ever told. You can’t be president if you no one ever told you to suceed. You cant be president if you have your gang affiliations worked out before high school. Let’s face it, right now you can’t be president if you are poor, not white, or a woman. Since I refuse that whole groups of people are less qualified for “sucess (as we capitalistly define it)” all I can think of is that we have to change things so that everyone gets a real equal oppetunity. Once again, I think education is the key. Something has to change. I cannot abide the inequality.

An organiztion, such as the government, has no right to kill people. So no death penalty. Of course individuals have no right to kill people either. Education, rehabilitation and detainment of people that are likely to canotinue to harm others is they key to preventing crime.

I have yet to figure out how my anti-killing stance affects the military. For now, just don’t fight for oil, favorable economic climate or things like that. I can handle stopping Hitler, but dropping bomb #2 on Nagasaki just to show Russia whoe’s boss was exessive.

Ideally we should work for personal fulfillment. We should understand that we work for both ourselves and our country. It doesn’t take much to live comfortably, and it doesnt take that much more to live really comfortably. Let there still be differences in income, but let no one worry wether their family is going to “make it” or not. It is my job as a citizen to use what I have been given for the good of my country. It’s the least I can do.

**

I have no idea how I’d label myself politically. At one time I voted Republican but I discovered that they weren’t interested in protecting my rights any more then the Democrats were. I vote Libertarian simply because they come closer then any other party I’ve seen.

I’ll sum up the basis for all my political thoughts as best I can. I believe every human being has a right to life, I think capitalism is a great thing, and I do believe government has a legitimate function (I’m no anarchist).

Right to life

Life is a self-generating self-sustaining process. Human beings have a right to live for themselves according to their own values. The right to life does not confer any special obligation by all other members of society. No matter how tragic my life is I am still not entitled to something I have not earned.

I have no ethical problems putting murderers to death. I do have concerns about getting the right person, the family of the person to be executed, and the stress imposed on the prison officials involved in the execution.

Capitalism

I like the idea of free trade. Individuals trade goods or services with others and all sides profit from it. This is a system where each individual can live according to their own values. Granted not everyone is going to have the same amount of wealth but I think the benefits outweigh the negatives.

Of course I happen to like clean air and water. I do think it is a governments place to protect our lungs from dirty air. I do support reasonable measures to ensure that we don’t pollute things to much. But I won’t protect the environment at the expense of human beings. If some endangered fish will be wiped out because we need a dam for water I don’t care about the fish.

Government

I believe the primary function of government is to protect the rights of individuals. Incidentally I put protecting the quality of air under the umbrella of protecting individual rights.

As I said earlier I’m a big fan of capitalism. However, I am concerned about elected officials basically being bought by large companies and other special interest. And steps should be taken to stop this from happening.

Marc

I was born into a liberal southern democrat family. And for many years, I have been a liberal democrat.

But now, I am in transition. In the past couple of years, I have become more and more conservative. Or maybe it’s just that the Democratic Party has changed. I do not think the government should butt into our personal lives. But I believe that people should take personal responsibility for their actions.

I listened to Dubya’s speech at the convention, and I only disagreed with him on a few issues. (school vouchers and partial birth abortion)

I’ve listened to Gore and felt in my heart that he was full of shit. And the Dem’s convention sweating my Los Angeles out of an additional 4 million in cash to the already 7 million in servivces we promised them…well, that really chapped my hide.

I may actually vote Republican. My grandaddy will roll over in his grave.

I can’t vote Republican because I believe it’s tenants are fueled by greed. Not that I don’t think that Dems are the same, they’re just a little more subtle about it, and a little more willing to share.

I do think there are “good” and “bad” causes, so yes…I moralize. I think a staunch supporter of the NRA has a real problem morally as opposed to someone who supports evironmental causes. I think if you need to feel passionate about something it should be about something that will come to some good.

I’m not sure where I stand anymore on abortion or the death penalty. I don’t think I believe much in either anymore. Mainly because I find it hard to continue to “support” abortion and not support the death penalty. It doesn’t make sense to me that you can be for one and not the other. I’ll have to get back to you on this one. I’m confused about what I believe to be “right” and “wrong” on these issues. I’m leaning in the direction that no one has the right to take someone else’s life, and the government certainly doesn’t have the right to sanction the practice.

Right now we have a government surplus after years of deficit. I DO NOT believe that we should “give it back” to the rich. It should be invested in something, or held for a rainy day. Pretty simple economics, but then I’m no economist. I just don’t think we should be handing out “refunds”. Let’s invest it in health care, medical research, social security, education, or don’t shoot me for saying this…THE ARTS! Which were abandoned oh so long ago by the REPUBLICANS!!! That’s just what this country needed a bunch of lawyers and investment bankers at the expense of artists, musicians, and writers. No wonder our culture is now defined by pop music, video games and internet porn.

I’m just not smart enough to fully understand global politics but I’ve never thought we should align ourselves with oppressive foreign governments. I don’t see anything wrong with protecting our own interests even if they are economic interests. And I’m not opposed to using force to do so. We should take care of ourselves first after all. But I do think that we owe it to ourselves as a civilized society to intervene when we see injustice. Often we have sat back and allowed the oppression and slaughter of millions of people because it wasn’t economically or politically advantageous for us to do something about it. This makes us out to be a nation of hypocrites. We also need a strong military if we do plan to stay the most powerful nation on this planet. And with this power can come benevolence. Despite what our critics think here on our own soil and elsewhere in the world, our way is better, I think we’ve proved that. Even with all of our problems.

Do we need “more” government or “less”. I’m not really sure what this means. It seems to me that we have way to much government control in some areas and not enough in others. No one can be so stupid as to believe that the so called “Drug War” is working. It’s a bigger farce than Vietnam and has probably cost more lives. I believe it’s a money pit and we are going about it all the wrong way. But then naturally nobody in state for federal governments will want to give up the power or money they have enjoyed under this program for so long now. It has become a national excuse for corruption at the expense of what may be our most needy citizens. I’ve been thinking about it and I don’t think gun control laws will help much at all until we revamp our drug war policy. Perhaps they won’t even be needed.

I’m terribly disturbed by the national trend towards the rights of our children. We should sign the UN treaty on the rights of the child and end our policy of treating our children like criminals. We have a responsiblity to our future and they are our future. We have a responsibility to ourselves to see to it that every American child is given the food, shelter, health care, education and support he needs to realize a decent life. Even if must intervene in their behalf.

Needs2know

I simply believe that, without exception, peaceful honest people should be free to pursue their own happiness in their own way. Why? Because it seems right to me.

politically i’m MACHIAVELLIAN LIBERTARIAN
economically i’m NEO-SMITHIAN ECONOMIC WARGAMER

there is no such thing as freedom, there is only power!

saying you have freedom simply means there is no external power limiting your personal power. noone can give you freedom, they can only cease to inhibit your power, so freedom is nothing to be grateful for. this land was here before europeans showed up. the philosophy of this country contradicts the authoritarian social-psychology of european culture, that is why the US is rather schizoid and contradictory. the private ownership of natural resources is no different from slavery, just laws backed up by force. the ECONOMIC WARGAME is a continuation of the MILITARY WARGAME by other means. the technology of the 20th century has made much of Marx and Smith obsolete. we have the productive capacity to saturate any market we want. planned obsolescence is necessary to keep the ECONOMIC POWER GAME going. television is used to brainwash everyone into being stupid consumers. it is 30 years since the moon landing, 60 years since the beginning of WWII when there were piston engine machines flying thru the air at 400 mph. the automobile industry is a technological joke. the united states is an economic slave state based on getting people to go into debt to buy trash designed to become obsolete.

Dal Timgar

Where I define myself on the spectrum depends upon how I feel that day.

Socially, I’m a mish-mash of conservative and liberal, probably closer to libertarian than anything else- pro-school vouchers, anti-death penalty, pro-marriage rights for homosexuals, anti-hate crime laws, etc.

Economically/governmentally, I’m conservative, but not libertarian. I believe that the government has a duty to interefere to an extent with the free market. The free market is the most efficient method of production, but the least just of all economic systems (the other extreme, communism, is extremely just but completely inefficient). The government therefore has a duty to step in and try and prevent what society considers injustices on the part of the free market (external costs such as pollution; ‘unethical’ actions such as child labor, forced labor, etc.), but as such actions are inefficient, they should be as limited as possible, and preferably work within the frame of free market activity (for example, Jack Kemp’s suggestion of creating ‘free enterprise zones’ in the inner cities to help bring investment and employment dollars to areas sorely lacking in both).

I’m also a strong de-centralist (the term “state’s right’s” carrying far too much racist baggage) and anti-communist.

So depending upon how I feel, I’m either a conservative, a liberal Republican, or a conservative Democrat. Generally, I lean towards the Republicans in views and voting. (My feeling on this: generally, the Republicans wish to remove programs, and the Democrats wish to add programs. Adding programs is a lot easier than removing programs. Ergo, the Republicans’ agenda is tougher to carry out, and if they go too far (i.e. do something I disagree with), it’s easier for others to undo. Conversely, the Democrats’ agenda is easier for them to carry out, and if they go too far (i.e., do something I disagree with), it’s harder for others to undo. Therefore, the Republicans are generally the safer candidates to support.)
As for what lead me to such views- Lord only knows. A mixture of books I’ve read (Hobbes’ Leviathan, O’Rourke’s Parliament of Whores, Destructive Generation by someone whose name I can’t remember) and where I’ve lived (Montgomery County, right outside of D.C.; a very liberal district, and with a very peacefully integrated population).

As I’ve stated before, I’m on the right – the far right.

[ul]
[li]I want the government to build and maintain an infrastructure that gives everyone a quasi-equal opportunity. If someone “gets lucky” or works harder and does better than everyone else, so what? If someone chooses to not take advantage of that infrasture, that’s their loss.[/li][li]I want the right to self-determination. If I choose to live paycheck to paycheck in a run down mobile home out in the woods and am happy, then the government has no business telling me that I’m NOT happy and trying to fix things.[/li][li]I want the constitution to be followed. To the letter. This means that I DO have the right to own guns. It also means that “separation of church and state” refers the the prohibition on the government from officially establishing or endorsing one religion over another.[/li][li]I especially want article 10 of the constitution to be enforced.[/li][li]I want the term “hate crime” stricken from all legal documents.[/li][li]I want the term “pro-choice” to be recoined to accurately reflect its “pro-abortion” stance.[/li][li]I want the left to quit telling me that I’m a bigot and a purveyor of injustice because I’m white.[/li][/ul]

Mostly though, I want those people that insist on blaming the faults of this country on big business to realize that those countries with the highest standard of living for most citizens are those countries that promote business.

My politics, as most of y’all are fairly conversative, a surprising revelation for a gay man.

In my twenties, I was a flaming lefty, strongly believing in government as a tool to help the less fortunate. As I grew older, I began to see the government as more hindrance than help. Now you can call me a Libertarian, I guess. I have zero use for the Democrats and the Republicans because they have been bought by big corporations. The sovereignty of the American people is being stripped from us by the traitors in Washington.

Immigration

My views have changed since I posted my [url=“http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=28489”]thread on the topic[/url. I still believe that all public business must be conducted in English, but we also need to make it easier for new citizens to assimilate. We have to realize that being American is more important than skin color or national origin. If you come here and wish to be a citizen, America has to be your new loyalty, not India, or Korea.

Capital Punishment
I’m against it. The legal system is run by flawed, fallible humans, and the chances of executing the innocent are too great. I don’t want to execute the guilty, either, because I don’t believe the State has the right to kill in my name, and I also believe that capital punishment tarnishes the collective soul of America and makes us that much more brutal and uncaring.

Abortion
I’m reluctantly pro-choice because ultimately it must be the woman’s right to choose to give birth, but I believe using abortion as routine birth control is disgusting. Abortions should be legal, but rare.

Gun Control
I support responsible gun ownership. As a free people, it is the right of Americans to own guns, but it is also their responsibility to use them safely. Getting a gun should be at least as hard as buying a car, and you should have to take a course in gun safety before you can buy a gun legally.

Drugs
We need to replace hysteria with logic. Slogans, dishonest ads, and mandatory sentences haven’t helped one bit. I would copy Amsterdam: allow marijuana to be smoked legally at designated bars in a specified area.

For crackheads and heroin addicts, I’m stumped. I have no idea how to help sorry creatures that can’t help themselves.

This is going to take some work…

I do not see why we have to keep propping up old Civil Rights Laws with new ones. Either enforce old ones, or pass one new Super Powered Civil Rights Law, which will put put everyone on the same level (See Harrison Bergeron, by Kurt Vonegut (sp)).

I want the right to own a gun. I think I’m intelligent enough to use it right. And just because I might want to own one, that doesn’t make me a criminal.

I think Abortion is a sorry form of birth control. Partal Birth Abortions are murder. Sorry if you’re offended. Not really.

I don’t want the government telling me everything I should do, nor is it entitled to know everything about me. It shouldn’t be able to read my email easier than it can tap my phone. (If I hook up my modem to send email, would they have to get a court order?)

I think only people with the right connections or money get into office anymore. We’re not a democracy, we are a federal republic. I’ll never be able to run for president, cause I don’t have the $200million it takes. Coporations buy republicans, Hollywood owns democrats.

Economics. More sins are committed here than anything. Corporations don’t deserve tax breaks, they make enough frickin’ money as it is. Corporations shouldn’t own congressmen. They shouldn’t have the right to buy my rights away from me.

Military: I think that we should maintain a strong force, only used if pushed. I think Saddam got off easy. We should have blown the hell out of him. Kosovo was a small Vietnam, that our draft dodger of a president didn’t attend.
We had no business doing half measures there, either bring in a massive force or stay out.

Crime: I don’t see the death penalty doing any good. Seems to be only detering the person whom the state kills. I don’t think we should have mandatory sentencing, judges should have leeway in how they can sentance. I don’t see legalizing drugs as a good idea. I don’t like the idea of 50 million people going to work each morning stoned silly. I don’t like the image of Monsanto or General Foods or Nabisco pushing Marijuana on TV, complete with cartoon characters and pseudohip MTV style jump cuts and loud music.

Oh yeah, I’ll have to second SouthernStyle’s sentiment of being tired of being told I’m a bigot simply because I’m a white southern male. I’m not. If you think I am one, it only shows you don’t know me.

I’ll stop here.