What if you’re in the outback and encounter a drop bear?
You're in the forest and a bear passes by. Assume no baby bears, and he's not hungry. How dangerous?
You ain’t going to make it up the tree.
You can also tell from the scat: twigs and leafy smell = black bear. Contains small bells and smells of bear spray = grizzly.
Bears are always potentially dangerous, and when I am in the woods, I like to have a pistol. That way I can shoot the stupid thing.
See post #59.
ETA: Anyone have offhand a history of the expression “armed for bear?”
There is a gun shop not too far from here called Bear Arms. In my head, I cannot resolve the name.
Don’t be so hard on yourself.

Bears are always potentially dangerous, and when I am in the woods, I like to have a pistol. That way I can shoot the stupid thing.
With a black bear, 99% of the time shooting it isn’t needed, and with a pistol it wouldn’t be effective.
With a grizzly, a pistol isn’t going to do squat.

Bears are always potentially dangerous, and when I am in the woods, I like to have a pistol. That way I can shoot the stupid thing.
Bacteria are far more dangerous in terms of the number of people sickened or killed. Are you also going to shoot bacteria? It will be just about as effective.
Stranger

[side query]
Curfew?
[/side query]
Just when they expect polar bears to be moving through. It’s mostly for kids, as I understand.

Bears are always potentially dangerous, and when I am in the woods, I like to have a pistol. That way I can shoot the stupid thing.
I captured my recent bear encounter with a few photos. Even armed with a S&W 500, the most powerful production handgun ever made… I still chose to walk calmly the other direction. These were big boys.

Bears are always potentially dangerous, and when I am in the woods, I like to have a pistol. That way I can shoot the stupid thing.

With a black bear, 99% of the time shooting it isn’t needed, and with a pistol it wouldn’t be effective.
With a grizzly, a pistol isn’t going to do squat.
I think Mister Mills was suggesting that the “stupid thing” would not be the bear.
I can’t speak for grizzlies. I’ve seen them and been close to them, but not enough to have any indication of their behavior. In my fairly extensive experience with black bears though (I live in West Virginia, we never extirpated them and currently have about 15 thousand bears in state, in comparison to New York’s 8 thousand and Pennsylvania’s 20 thousand), either advice is correct. Although staying still is probably better. For the most part, black bears don’t give a rip about you. You’re furniture to them. (I’ve heard that young boars will stalk and prey on people though, but I personally have never seen it.) There are many times when I’ve been in the woods around a campfire or just sitting under a tree and I’ll hear a shuffling and a bear will wander by. If you stand up, they’ll sometimes startle and take off. Most of the time, they’ll look up at you for half a second and then keep rooting around for whatever they were after. Sometimes, they’ll change direction toward you figuring that you have some food somewhere, then you usually have to chuck a rock at them so your camp doesn’t get torn up. Have you ever seen the video of the crying woman screaming at a bear that’s eating her kayak? If so, that’s pretty much exactly how black bears act. They pretty much act as though the rest of the world doesn’t exist. The whole ‘mama with cubs’ is even greatly exaggerated. Mostly, a mama and cubs will just tromp along without caring a rip about you either. I guess if you were aggressive towards them you might be in for a treat, but if you mind your own business, they’ll mind theirs.

Have you ever seen the video of the crying woman screaming at a bear that’s eating her kayak? If so, that’s pretty much exactly how black bears act. They pretty much act as though the rest of the world doesn’t exist.
For those interested here is the video mentioned (the woman is a bit shrill so you might want to lower your volume some): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nU5cMZymSr0

With black bears, the aggressive prey instinct is pretty low. They are omnivores, very little of their food comes from prey…
More specifically–who says I don’t know nothing 'bout bears?–in following leads from this thread, I leaned a new word–“hypocarnivore”–which I and you are, apparently, and smack there in the Wiki illustration is a bear munching a dandelion. Texts says black bear–isn’t that photo a grizzly (I know being brown doesn’t rule out a black bear) with its hump and all?

Texts says black bear–isn’t that photo a grizzly (I know being brown doesn’t rule out a black bear) with its hump and all?
Looks like a Black Bear to me. Grizzlies have much broader heads and proportionately smaller ears. The “hump” just looks like the hair on the shoulders is standing up.
OK. You’re the critter boss here.

You know, all these years later, I’ve thought the same thing. I think they did panic. I never really understood why they didn’t use the tranquilizer gun. It sounds like the motivation behind a lot of shootings in general – if you have a gun, and you feel your life is in danger, you use it. The only possible justification I can think of is that they may have felt (probably incorrectly) that this bear was a long-term danger to campers.
Tranquilizer guns take a long time to take effect, like over half an hour. They’re useless as a defence against an animal that’s already acting aggressive; it could complete the attack before it even started feeling sleepy. That’s why they’re often used from helicopters; there can be a long chase before anything even starts to happen.
Anaesthesia is tricky enough on humans under controlled conditions; there’s nothing fast acting that would be usable against a wild animal in a field situation without it basically killing most of the animals it’s used on.
If a bear is approaching you and you have a backpack full of food, and you toss it his way, will it stop to investigate the food source, or ignore it and continue to menace/stalk you?