wow! I did not realize that every single gay man became gay because they were molested as children. Learn something new every day. :rolleyes::rolleyes:
That is not what it said it all. It takes being molested AND not dragging your torn up and bloody body straight to church immediately afterwards to become gay. The nurse didn’t turn out to be a lesbian after all.
Great Chick Tract. Let’s hope there is a good run of them in 2011.
But see, he’s grown beyond such obvious tropes and matured into a whole new realm of subtlety. Why, I got to panel 5 or 6 before realizing that those people were supposed to be gay men with AIDS, and not just your everyday run-of-the-mill cancer or dementia patients. And not a hook-nosed Jew or turbaned Mooslim in sight!
I’m just not sure I’m on board with this whole “subtlety” concept.
You see, evangelical tracts should knock would-be converts over the head with plain, easy-to-comprehend English, just as God wrote the Bible in plain, easy-to-comprehend English.
Subtlety is tool of Satan. It creates guessing games. No good can come of it.
I’m not even sure which is my favorite part, the giant evil demon heart, the brutal rape of the hospice care lady (which would’ve made her a lesbian if it weren’t for the happy coincidence of running into a conservative church in the middle of nowhere), gay AIDS patient #3 going, “I love my lifestyle and I HATE Jesus!”… They’re all good. I’m sure this tract will convince many gay folks that they need to convert to Jack Chick’s brand of independent fundamentalist Baptist Christianity and be saved.
Man oh man oh man. Where to start? It’s grossly offensive, completely wrong, filled with bizarre evil lizards, and ends with a giant slime meteor slamming into the earth. This is Chick Classic!
So God sends fireballs and slime meteors and floods, but Satan causes people to get AIDS. Or is it the other way around? This religion stuff can be confusing.
I’ve seen a lot of . . . . remarkable messages from Chick, we all have, but, “Rape/molestation can put a possessing-demon into you that turns you gay” . . . Wow! This sets a new standard!
And . . . I knew you’re not supposed to “lust after strange flesh,” but I was thinking, you know, nutria or sweetbreads or something . . .
Hijack: I just recently, online, re-read The Screwtape Letters, by C.S. Lewis. (One of the most convincing atheism tracts ever, but that’s nor here nor there.) And it’s hard to believe the same religion (yes, yes, or whatever word Chick would prefer) produced them both. The similarities are obvious, of course. But, to Lewis, once you become a Christian you are by no means home free, there still are countless ways for the demons to subtly and gradually wear down your spiritual state until they have you. Saving your soul is hard work in ways you could never imagine when you start. Chick is all about once-and-for-all “easy grace”; apparently once you’re sincerely born-again and saved, Wormwood can’t even whisper in your ear.
On any scale of “realism” applicable to such things, I would say Lewis is far, far more realistic than Chick.
Creating little sodomites?
I see all aids patients suffer from kaposis sarcoma at the same time.
Also, no one ever gets it from a transfusion or bad needle.
Love the evil tomato (it was a tomato, not a turnip!)
No, no. Satan causes people to schlurp the schlong and wiggle their wicked weenies in bouncy backsides. AIDS is simply God’s just burning vengeance on those who yield to temptation.
“Satan is one of the most powerful beings created by the Lord Jesus”.
Did I miss that part of the New Testament? When did that happen? Did JC conjure up loaves, fishes, and satan? Did he change too much water into wine and create Satan as a drinking buddy?