The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > In My Humble Opinion (IMHO)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-08-2004, 11:23 AM
Jophiel Jophiel is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Reagan on the $10?

Effort to put Reagan on the $10 bill

I'm not going to debate if the Gipper should be on a bill or coin so let's just pretend he's going to be. Which bill or coin do you think would be best to change? Keep in mind that we're not making any new denominations, so he can't go on the $30.

Who We Currently Have
$1 - George Washington
$2 - Thomas Jefferson (yes, these still circulate)
$5 - Abraham Lincoln
$10 - Alexander Hamilton
$20 - Andrew Jackson
$50 - Ulysses S. Grant
$100 - Benjamin Franklin

1˘ - Abraham Lincoln
5˘ - Thomas Jefferson
10˘ - Franklin D. Roosevelt
25˘ - George Washington
50˘ - John F. Kennedy
100˘ - Sacajawea

Retired Denominations
$500 - William McKinley
$1,000 - Grover Cleveland
$5,000 - James Madison
$10,000 - Salmon P. Chase
$100,000 - Woodrow Wilson.

There's tons of retired coins, two of the most recent are the Eisenhower dollar and Susan B. Anthony dollar.

Any other Presidents or major Americans you think should get shuffled around?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 06-08-2004, 11:30 AM
World Eater World Eater is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Put him on the $500 and be done with this stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-08-2004, 11:32 AM
World Eater World Eater is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by World Eater
Put him on the $500 and be done with this stupidity.
*The Reagan on the $10 stupidity, not your thread.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-08-2004, 11:36 AM
Jophiel Jophiel is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
I figured, but thanks
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-08-2004, 11:37 AM
Maus Magill Maus Magill is offline
Not a real doctor.
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 5,783
Reagan in the dime?
No. He had too much respect and graditude to FDR to replace him. Also, the man's widow doesn't even support the idea.

Reagan on the $10?
No. If it weren't for Hamilton, there wouldn't even be a $10 bill.

If we were to put Reagan on a bill, I would support replacing Grant on the $50. Why not replace the head of a corrupt administration with the head of a slightly ledd corrupt administration?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-08-2004, 11:39 AM
The Great Sun Jester The Great Sun Jester is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Bury the man. Put is face in some history books. Let the Reagans get on with their lives. If you want a new face on some money, look to someone who was responsible for orchestrating positive US history. Not someone who escalated one of the most ridiculous non-wars in history. Not someone who just simply refused to speak to his chief adversary for...what...his entire first term?

Put a statesman on the money. Doesn't have to be a president (Franklin, Anthony, Sacajawea). Just someone who's done something really REALLY good. Like Bill Gates.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-08-2004, 11:49 AM
World Eater World Eater is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inigo Montoya
Just someone who's done something really REALLY good. Like Bill Gates.
Man run, run for the hills, now!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-08-2004, 11:59 AM
cmason32 cmason32 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
When conservatives tried to put him on the dime last year, Nancy spoke out against it. I wonder whether she still opposes it, and whether conservatives will proceed if it remains against her wishes.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-08-2004, 01:48 PM
SmackFu SmackFu is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Why is Andrew Jackson on the $20 anyways? I think Hamilton deserves a bill more than he does.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-08-2004, 01:56 PM
BobLibDem BobLibDem is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Reagan on the $10. Absolutely unbelievable the depths to which the Reagan apologists will descend.

But I think some updating is in order.

$20: What on earth did Andy Jackson do to warrant being on currency? My nominee: Martin Luther King

$50: US Grant: Good soldier, lousy president. Off with him. Replace him with a truly underrated patriot: John Adams.

$100: Really, what did Ben Franklin actually do? He wasn't terribly active or effective at the Continental Congress. If you read McCullough's bio of John Adams, you really see he was a lazy and devious little snot while serving as ambassador to France. Give this one to Jefferson and scrap the $2 bill.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-08-2004, 02:02 PM
RandomLetters RandomLetters is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Put Reagan on the $20. Get rid of that scum-bag, good for nothing, Jackson.

(And yes, I do have Cherokee ancestors.)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-08-2004, 02:04 PM
Evil One Evil One is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
I don't know the history, but my guess is that Jackson was still prominent in memory when the 20 was created for general circulation. I wouldn't have a problem with replacing Jackson with Reagan. I think Hamilton was much more of a "founding father" and deserves to stay where he is.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-08-2004, 02:06 PM
Tigers2B1 Tigers2B1 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Lincoln and Washington both already have their mugs on coins and paper. So, Reagan's handsome, square jawed bust can be placed on either the cent or the quarter - or the dollar or five dollar bill. Hamilton stays on the 10. Jackson, with his powerful mane, stays on the 20. Everybody wins!!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-08-2004, 03:48 PM
kunilou kunilou is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 15,913
There is only one solution. Reagan goes on the $1 coin.

Think of it. The dollar coin has never been popular since it was brought back in the 1960s. The Mint has tried different sizes, different faces and finally different colors. Nothing has worked.

So put Reagan on there. Conservatives will love it and consider it their patriotic job to put as many in circulation as possible. Liberals will hate it, and spend them to get rid of them as quickly as possible. Meantime, the government will quit having to produce so many dollar bills (thus fulfilling a Reagan wish to reduce the government's size), and since George Washington is already on the quarter, it's not like he's getting the short end of anything.

As for Sacajewea, let's put her on the main design for the first class stamp.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-08-2004, 03:52 PM
The Great Sun Jester The Great Sun Jester is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunilou
As for Sacajewea, let's put her on the main design for the first class stamp.
This is probably another thread, but how does she rate getting her mug on currency anyway? Since when do we honor Native Americans?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-08-2004, 03:56 PM
Tigers2B1 Tigers2B1 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inigo Montoya
This is probably another thread, but how does she rate getting her mug on currency anyway? Since when do we honor Native Americans?
Since at least from the Buffalo nickel and Indian Head penny days. But you’re right – that’s for another thread.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-08-2004, 03:57 PM
Crafter_Man Crafter_Man is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil One
think Hamilton was much more of a "founding father" and deserves to stay where he is.
IMO Hamilton was a scoundrel. I'd rather have Porky the Pig on the $10 than Hamilton...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-08-2004, 04:00 PM
The Great Sun Jester The Great Sun Jester is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigers2B1
Since at least from the Buffalo nickel and Indian Head penny days. But you’re right – that’s for another thread.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-08-2004, 04:03 PM
Crafter_Man Crafter_Man is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobLibDem
Really, what did Ben Franklin actually do?
Well, he impregnated a lot of women. So surely he deserves some kind of "notable achievement" award...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-08-2004, 04:28 PM
stuyguy stuyguy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Well, there is an intriguing convergence of events a-brewing here!

Let me explain. The Republicans, who are behind the pro-Reagan measure, are having their convention here in NYC. Well, this just so happens to be the bicentennial of the famous Hamilton-Burr duel, and Alexander Hamilton is regarded by NYers as the city's greatest colonial-era champion. (As a staunch Federalist he is also considered the founding spirit of the Republican Party, which makes the replacement proposal all the more bizarre.) To mark the milestone -- and capture some of the convention traffic -- the New-York Historical Society is planning a unprecedented mega-exhibit around Hamilton's considerable contributions to our city and nation! I wonder if the Reaganites will be swayed by the exhibit. Or maybe they'll snub it altogether.

In any case, much as I like RR, he does not deserve to be on our currency, especially if it means giving Hamilton the boot.

BTW, I'm so delighted to see all the anti-Jacksonians! I always thought AJ was a brutish pig, unworthy of all the hero-worship he seemed to attract in the middle of the 20th century. Thank goodness it seems to be fading. If anyone's got to go, it's him. (Though it kills me to admit, he is a dashing devil on the twenty!)
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-08-2004, 04:32 PM
stuyguy stuyguy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crafter_Man
IMO Hamilton was a scoundrel. I'd rather have Porky the Pig on the $10 than Hamilton...
Crafter, could you explain your disdain for AH more fully?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-08-2004, 05:18 PM
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
How about we stick Ronnie on the $2, dump Andy off the $20 and replace him with Walt Whitman?
__________________
***Don't ask me, I don't post here any more, and I'm probably not even reading this now.***
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-08-2004, 05:25 PM
Bippy the Beardless Bippy the Beardless is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Can we put Bush on $0 bill, that would sum him up nicely?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-08-2004, 05:26 PM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 24,899
The only problem with putting Reagan on a $10 bill is that soon afterward it will only be worth a fraction of its former value, and will eventually need to be accompanied by a $20 bill in order to be worth the original $10.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-08-2004, 05:34 PM
Master Wang-Ka Master Wang-Ka is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Mm-hm. They also introduced a notion in Congress to have Ronnie added to Mount Rushmore.

Precisely WHAT did the man do that allovasudden has the Neocons wanting his mug all over the place? Besides die, that is.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-08-2004, 06:04 PM
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master Wang-Ka
Mm-hm. They also introduced a notion in Congress to have Ronnie added to Mount Rushmore.

Precisely WHAT did the man do that allovasudden has the Neocons wanting his mug all over the place? Besides die, that is.
Actually, I remember hearing them wanting to place Ronnie on Rushmore back in the 80s, a noted geologist pointed out that the rockface wouldn't be able to withstand the necessary work to add any face to the mountain, and it would bring the whole side of the mountain down, thus ruining the existing artwork.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-08-2004, 06:20 PM
Giraffe Giraffe is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: ♂ San Jose, CA
Posts: 9,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuyguy
Crafter, could you explain your disdain for AH more fully?
Or, barring that, your reverance for Porky Pig?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-08-2004, 07:33 PM
LouisB LouisB is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 8,030
Create a $3.00 bill.

Make sure everyone knows it is really worth only $0.35.

Put the worthless POS's picture on that.

Put a picture of Mickey Damn Mouse on the other side.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-08-2004, 08:12 PM
USCDiver USCDiver is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: NC
Posts: 3,826
Put his face on the $100,000 bill and watch as it eventually trickles down to the $1 bill.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-08-2004, 08:25 PM
ftg ftg is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
It is absolutely inconceivable that any of the current honorees would be for a second considered so low as to be replaced by an actor on a coin/bill. That would be just too darn insulting. All of the current honorees (of coins/bills still being made) have legions of fans. They would be POed big time.

So, go with a new denomination. That should stall things until Rational Thought comes back into vogue. (So I'm an optimist.)
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 06-08-2004, 08:56 PM
mhendo mhendo is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
I think we should put Reagan on the penny, and then follow William Safire's advice.

Personally, i'd like to see Madison and/or Jefferson on a commonly-circulating piece of paper currency. In fact, i'd be quite happy for the Jefferson $2 bill to come into regualr circulation.

I completely agree with those who want to get rid of Grant. I can never look at a $50 bill without thinking of Henry Adams's opinion that Grant was a challenge to those who believed in evolution. From The Education of Henry Adams:
Quote:
That, two thousand years after Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar, a man like Grant should be called--and should actually and truly be--the highest product of the most advanced evolution, made evolution ludicrous. One must be as commonplace as Grant's own commonplaces to maintain such an absurdity. The progress of evolution from President Washington to President Grant, was alone evidence enough to upset Darwin.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-08-2004, 08:57 PM
mhendo mhendo is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisB
Create a $3.00 bill.

Make sure everyone knows it is really worth only $0.35.

Put the worthless POS's picture on that.

Put a picture of Mickey Damn Mouse on the other side.
Tell us how you really feel!

Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-08-2004, 09:04 PM
SmackFu SmackFu is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuyguy
To mark the milestone -- and capture some of the convention traffic -- the New-York Historical Society is planning a unprecedented mega-exhibit around Hamilton's considerable contributions to our city and nation!
I bet they're ticked that the actual duel was in Weehawken... NJ!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-08-2004, 09:07 PM
Jonathan Chance Jonathan Chance is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: On the run with Kilroy.
Posts: 14,828
Put me in the 'replace Jackson' camp.

Why the hell we keep a homicidal psychopath on a piece of currency is beyond me. If it takes Reagan to move him then so be it.

And the Rushmore thing is really just Grover Norquist being a freak again (something he excels at). I caught an interview with him earlier where he (sorta tongue in cheek) claimed that Hamilton should be replaced because Hamilton was a 'bad shot'. Evidently Norquist digs the guns and thinks Hamilton should have been able to kill Burr.

Freak, I tell you. He's a freak!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-08-2004, 09:14 PM
carnivorousplant carnivorousplant is offline
Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 35,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomLetters
Get rid of that scum-bag, good for nothing, Jackson.
I agree with the last part.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-08-2004, 09:15 PM
kanicbird kanicbird is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 1999
$1 - George Washington
$2 - Thomas Jefferson (yes, these still circulate)
$5 - Abraham Lincoln
$10 - Alexander Hamilton
$20 - Andrew Jackson
$50 - Ulysses S. Grant
$100 - Benjamin Franklin

1˘ - Abraham Lincoln
5˘ - Thomas Jefferson
10˘ - Franklin D. Roosevelt
25˘ - George Washington
50˘ - John F. Kennedy
100˘ - Sacajawea

The song "one of these things are not like the other, one of these things just doesn't belong" run through my head, and make a perfect opening for R. Reagan.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-08-2004, 09:55 PM
stuyguy stuyguy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmackFu
I bet they're ticked that the actual duel was in Weehawken... NJ!
Funny. The highlight of the exhibit will probably be the actual dueling pistols which have been locked away in the vaults of Chase Manhattan Bank for decades. (You will recall that both Hamilton & Burr founded banks, the Bank of NY and today's Chase Manhattan respectively. Both still exist. Burr founded Chase under the guise of starting a water-supply company for thirsty Manhattan. The charter allowed the company to, in essence, operate as a bank -- Burr's real objective. They did actually lay some water pipes, it should be said.) Why does Chase have both guns you may wonder. Well, they both belonged to Burr. It was customary for the challenger to supply the weapons for a duel.

The city of Weehawken, I am told, is planning to re-enact the duel (perhaps with the aid of the N-YHS). That should be fun.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:01 PM
carnivorousplant carnivorousplant is offline
Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 35,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckerfan
it would bring the whole side of the mountain down
It would trickle down?
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:04 PM
carnivorousplant carnivorousplant is offline
Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 35,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuyguy
Chase Manhattan respectively.
I owe credit card debt to Aaron Burr?
Man, that sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:04 PM
Tigers2B1 Tigers2B1 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by carnivorousplant
It would trickle down?
OK than- they don’t have to add a face ---- all they have to do is chisel off Teddy’s glasses and moustache --- the result should look like Reagan. Put Teddy on the 10 dollar bill.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:06 PM
Captain Amazing Captain Amazing is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 22,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan Chance
Why the hell we keep a homicidal psychopath on a piece of currency is beyond me. If it takes Reagan to move him then so be it.
Because he vetoed the Bank of the United States, thereby decentralizing monetary control in this country and leading to the creation of state and private banks.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:10 PM
Marley23 Marley23 is offline
Administerminator
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 69,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanicbird
100˘ - Sacajawea

The song "one of these things are not like the other, one of these things just doesn't belong" run through my head, and make a perfect opening for R. Reagan.
It'd be dubious praise at best to put the man on a coin nobody uses, so I don't think that'll happen. (Just like it'd be strange to name an airport after him... oh wait.)

I think the proposition mentioned at the end of the CNN piece - put him on half the dimes - is probably the most likely for reasons they explain. I think it's way over the top, but then again I'm not shamelessly kissing up to a constituency.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:15 PM
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by carnivorousplant
It would trickle down?
I don't know, but I guess I whooshed everybody with why I suggested putting Reagan on the $2 bill. It is, after all, the bill everyone forgets is in circulation, so who better than to put on it, but a man who forgot everyone? (It gets really ugly if you think about it.)
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:19 PM
RickJay RickJay is offline
Charter Jays Fan
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Posts: 29,879
If I may speak as an outsider,

1. Logically the first people you should remove from currency are the ones who are currently on TWO items of currency, and

2. Reagan shouldn't go on until more deserving people do.

It makes no sense to me for Washington to get the $1 and the quarter. There's a certain obvious logic to having him on the $1, so take the quarter from him and give it to King.

However, the U.S. really needs to dump the $1 bill and go with $1 coins. So in the ideal world, you'd dump Sacagawea - come on, what a silly choice that was - and move Washington to the $1 COIN, freeing up the $0.25 for the Reverend Doc.

If you then must put Reagan on something, drop Jackson from the $20 - he looks crazy, anyway - and give Reagan the $20.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:19 PM
cookeze cookeze is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Reagan liked to tell this story:

"You know, a young man went into a grocery store and he had an orange in one hand and a bottle of vodka in the other, and he paid for the orange with food stamps and he took the change and paid for the vodka. That's what's wrong."

So I say we put his picture on the front of a $10 food stamp.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:23 PM
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by cookeze
Reagan liked to tell this story:

"You know, a young man went into a grocery store and he had an orange in one hand and a bottle of vodka in the other, and he paid for the orange with food stamps and he took the change and paid for the vodka. That's what's wrong."

So I say we put his picture on the front of a $10 food stamp.
Except, of course, most states have gone with a debit card system for food stamps now, so you'd have to put him on the card, and at least the ones around here have the Statue of Liberty and the American flag on them, and really, I think even Ronnie would be more than happy to give up his place for Lady Liberty.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:27 PM
carnivorousplant carnivorousplant is offline
Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 35,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickJay
take the quarter from him and give it to King.
Absolutely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickJay
However, the U.S. really needs to dump the $1 bill and go with $1 coins.
No way. Too much big change I get during the day to carry in my pocket. Being male I use the automated checkout at Kroger. Buy a coke with a twenty and I have a pound of nineteen dollar coins to put in my pocket. My pants would fall down and all the women in the store would laugh themselves to death.
Not a good idea.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:32 PM
pyrrthon1 pyrrthon1 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Put Reagan on the heads side of the penny and Bonzo on the tails.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:33 PM
Marley23 Marley23 is offline
Administerminator
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 69,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickJay
It makes no sense to me for Washington to get the $1 and the quarter. There's a certain obvious logic to having him on the $1, so take the quarter from him and give it to King.
Nice as it sounds, this would be tremendously controversial. I can't see it happening- who in Congress wants to be the guy who starts a fight over this?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-08-2004, 10:38 PM
citrus x paradisi citrus x paradisi is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Few presidents deserve to be on the most-counterfeited bill more than Jackson. The past fifty years have had quite a bumper crop, but I think we ought to have a longer grace period before the deceased can haunt us through our wallets.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.