|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reagan on the $10?
Effort to put Reagan on the $10 bill
I'm not going to debate if the Gipper should be on a bill or coin so let's just pretend he's going to be. Which bill or coin do you think would be best to change? Keep in mind that we're not making any new denominations, so he can't go on the $30. Who We Currently Have $1 - George Washington $2 - Thomas Jefferson (yes, these still circulate) $5 - Abraham Lincoln $10 - Alexander Hamilton $20 - Andrew Jackson $50 - Ulysses S. Grant $100 - Benjamin Franklin 1˘ - Abraham Lincoln 5˘ - Thomas Jefferson 10˘ - Franklin D. Roosevelt 25˘ - George Washington 50˘ - John F. Kennedy 100˘ - Sacajawea Retired Denominations $500 - William McKinley $1,000 - Grover Cleveland $5,000 - James Madison $10,000 - Salmon P. Chase $100,000 - Woodrow Wilson. There's tons of retired coins, two of the most recent are the Eisenhower dollar and Susan B. Anthony dollar. Any other Presidents or major Americans you think should get shuffled around? |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Put him on the $500 and be done with this stupidity.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I figured, but thanks
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reagan in the dime?
No. He had too much respect and graditude to FDR to replace him. Also, the man's widow doesn't even support the idea. Reagan on the $10? No. If it weren't for Hamilton, there wouldn't even be a $10 bill. If we were to put Reagan on a bill, I would support replacing Grant on the $50. Why not replace the head of a corrupt administration with the head of a slightly ledd corrupt administration? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bury the man. Put is face in some history books. Let the Reagans get on with their lives. If you want a new face on some money, look to someone who was responsible for orchestrating positive US history. Not someone who escalated one of the most ridiculous non-wars in history. Not someone who just simply refused to speak to his chief adversary for...what...his entire first term?
Put a statesman on the money. Doesn't have to be a president (Franklin, Anthony, Sacajawea). Just someone who's done something really REALLY good. Like Bill Gates. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
When conservatives tried to put him on the dime last year, Nancy spoke out against it. I wonder whether she still opposes it, and whether conservatives will proceed if it remains against her wishes.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why is Andrew Jackson on the $20 anyways? I think Hamilton deserves a bill more than he does.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reagan on the $10. Absolutely unbelievable the depths to which the Reagan apologists will descend.
But I think some updating is in order. $20: What on earth did Andy Jackson do to warrant being on currency? My nominee: Martin Luther King $50: US Grant: Good soldier, lousy president. Off with him. Replace him with a truly underrated patriot: John Adams. $100: Really, what did Ben Franklin actually do? He wasn't terribly active or effective at the Continental Congress. If you read McCullough's bio of John Adams, you really see he was a lazy and devious little snot while serving as ambassador to France. Give this one to Jefferson and scrap the $2 bill. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Put Reagan on the $20. Get rid of that scum-bag, good for nothing, Jackson.
(And yes, I do have Cherokee ancestors.) |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't know the history, but my guess is that Jackson was still prominent in memory when the 20 was created for general circulation. I wouldn't have a problem with replacing Jackson with Reagan. I think Hamilton was much more of a "founding father" and deserves to stay where he is.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lincoln and Washington both already have their mugs on coins and paper. So, Reagan's handsome, square jawed bust can be placed on either the cent or the quarter - or the dollar or five dollar bill. Hamilton stays on the 10. Jackson, with his powerful mane, stays on the 20. Everybody wins!!
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is only one solution. Reagan goes on the $1 coin.
Think of it. The dollar coin has never been popular since it was brought back in the 1960s. The Mint has tried different sizes, different faces and finally different colors. Nothing has worked. So put Reagan on there. Conservatives will love it and consider it their patriotic job to put as many in circulation as possible. Liberals will hate it, and spend them to get rid of them as quickly as possible. Meantime, the government will quit having to produce so many dollar bills (thus fulfilling a Reagan wish to reduce the government's size), and since George Washington is already on the quarter, it's not like he's getting the short end of anything. As for Sacajewea, let's put her on the main design for the first class stamp. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, there is an intriguing convergence of events a-brewing here!
Let me explain. The Republicans, who are behind the pro-Reagan measure, are having their convention here in NYC. Well, this just so happens to be the bicentennial of the famous Hamilton-Burr duel, and Alexander Hamilton is regarded by NYers as the city's greatest colonial-era champion. (As a staunch Federalist he is also considered the founding spirit of the Republican Party, which makes the replacement proposal all the more bizarre.) To mark the milestone -- and capture some of the convention traffic -- the New-York Historical Society is planning a unprecedented mega-exhibit around Hamilton's considerable contributions to our city and nation! I wonder if the Reaganites will be swayed by the exhibit. Or maybe they'll snub it altogether. In any case, much as I like RR, he does not deserve to be on our currency, especially if it means giving Hamilton the boot. BTW, I'm so delighted to see all the anti-Jacksonians! I always thought AJ was a brutish pig, unworthy of all the hero-worship he seemed to attract in the middle of the 20th century. Thank goodness it seems to be fading. If anyone's got to go, it's him. (Though it kills me to admit, he is a dashing devil on the twenty!) |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
How about we stick Ronnie on the $2, dump Andy off the $20 and replace him with Walt Whitman?
__________________
***Don't ask me, I don't post here any more, and I'm probably not even reading this now.*** |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we put Bush on $0 bill, that would sum him up nicely?
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
The only problem with putting Reagan on a $10 bill is that soon afterward it will only be worth a fraction of its former value, and will eventually need to be accompanied by a $20 bill in order to be worth the original $10.
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mm-hm. They also introduced a notion in Congress to have Ronnie added to Mount Rushmore.
Precisely WHAT did the man do that allovasudden has the Neocons wanting his mug all over the place? Besides die, that is. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Create a $3.00 bill.
Make sure everyone knows it is really worth only $0.35. Put the worthless POS's picture on that. Put a picture of Mickey Damn Mouse on the other side. |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Put his face on the $100,000 bill and watch as it eventually trickles down to the $1 bill.
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is absolutely inconceivable that any of the current honorees would be for a second considered so low as to be replaced by an actor on a coin/bill. That would be just too darn insulting. All of the current honorees (of coins/bills still being made) have legions of fans. They would be POed big time.
So, go with a new denomination. That should stall things until Rational Thought comes back into vogue. (So I'm an optimist.) |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think we should put Reagan on the penny, and then follow William Safire's advice.
Personally, i'd like to see Madison and/or Jefferson on a commonly-circulating piece of paper currency. In fact, i'd be quite happy for the Jefferson $2 bill to come into regualr circulation. I completely agree with those who want to get rid of Grant. I can never look at a $50 bill without thinking of Henry Adams's opinion that Grant was a challenge to those who believed in evolution. From The Education of Henry Adams: Quote:
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Put me in the 'replace Jackson' camp.
Why the hell we keep a homicidal psychopath on a piece of currency is beyond me. If it takes Reagan to move him then so be it. And the Rushmore thing is really just Grover Norquist being a freak again (something he excels at). I caught an interview with him earlier where he (sorta tongue in cheek) claimed that Hamilton should be replaced because Hamilton was a 'bad shot'. Evidently Norquist digs the guns and thinks Hamilton should have been able to kill Burr. Freak, I tell you. He's a freak! |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
$1 - George Washington
$2 - Thomas Jefferson (yes, these still circulate) $5 - Abraham Lincoln $10 - Alexander Hamilton $20 - Andrew Jackson $50 - Ulysses S. Grant $100 - Benjamin Franklin 1˘ - Abraham Lincoln 5˘ - Thomas Jefferson 10˘ - Franklin D. Roosevelt 25˘ - George Washington 50˘ - John F. Kennedy 100˘ - Sacajawea The song "one of these things are not like the other, one of these things just doesn't belong" run through my head, and make a perfect opening for R. Reagan. |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The city of Weehawken, I am told, is planning to re-enact the duel (perhaps with the aid of the N-YHS). That should be fun. |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Man, that sucks. |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think the proposition mentioned at the end of the CNN piece - put him on half the dimes - is probably the most likely for reasons they explain. I think it's way over the top, but then again I'm not shamelessly kissing up to a constituency.
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
(It gets really ugly if you think about it.)
|
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
If I may speak as an outsider,
1. Logically the first people you should remove from currency are the ones who are currently on TWO items of currency, and 2. Reagan shouldn't go on until more deserving people do. It makes no sense to me for Washington to get the $1 and the quarter. There's a certain obvious logic to having him on the $1, so take the quarter from him and give it to King. However, the U.S. really needs to dump the $1 bill and go with $1 coins. So in the ideal world, you'd dump Sacagawea - come on, what a silly choice that was - and move Washington to the $1 COIN, freeing up the $0.25 for the Reverend Doc. If you then must put Reagan on something, drop Jackson from the $20 - he looks crazy, anyway - and give Reagan the $20. |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reagan liked to tell this story:
"You know, a young man went into a grocery store and he had an orange in one hand and a bottle of vodka in the other, and he paid for the orange with food stamps and he took the change and paid for the vodka. That's what's wrong." So I say we put his picture on the front of a $10 food stamp. |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Not a good idea. |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Put Reagan on the heads side of the penny and Bonzo on the tails.
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Few presidents deserve to be on the most-counterfeited bill more than Jackson. The past fifty years have had quite a bumper crop, but I think we ought to have a longer grace period before the deceased can haunt us through our wallets.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|