The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Mundane Pointless Stuff I Must Share (MPSIMS)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-22-2005, 11:10 PM
Nobody Nobody is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Question for Libertarians on payment for services

I have a hard time wrapping my head around Libertarian ideas, but I am curious about something. I admit that my last question seem pretty silly, but I think it's the only way I can understand how things would work.

If we had a Libertarian government, do I understand correctly that each person would only pay for services that we use? For example, if I didn't want police or fire protection, I could choose not to pay for those services?

If not, how would the system work?

If so, if there weren't enough residents of a city or town who wanted to pay for a particular service, say police, fire, school, or whatever, and it caused the cost to be too high for the remaining residents, either causing an undue financial burden, or, having to shut down the service, how would this problem be resolved?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 07-23-2005, 12:49 AM
Freddy the Pig Freddy the Pig is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Not all libertarians agree on these things. Like liberals and conservatives, libertarians (whether or not they are members of the Libertarian Party) often disagree among themselves.

The mainstream libertarian position would probably be that the purpose of government is to protect the lives, liberty, and property of its citizens, and that police and fire protection are therefore among the legitimate functions of government. The argument is stronger with respect to police. Police aren't always summoned on behalf of a specific "customer"; they spend much of their time patrolling and responding to emergencies. When the state arrests and prosecutes a criminal, it does so not just on behalf of the victim, but on behalf of the entire society which has an interest in maintaining law and order.

Fire protection is more debatable; one can imagine contracting with private fire companies who respond to calls on behalf of their paying customers. (I believe this is the norm in some rural areas.) The problem is that fires have a habit of spreading, especially in densely populated areas, so that one person's refusal to pay for service could jeapordize an entire neighborhood. So again, I think that even most libertarians accept municipal fire departments in urban areas.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.