I always knew Cheney was quick to temper after that, "Go fuck yourself,"...

But this is a bit ridiculous:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,184617,00.html

Okay, so it was actually an accidental shooting of a fellow hunter, but may I take a moment to say, “way to be a strong example for safe gun use and ownership, dumbass!”

From the archives:
http://www.spokesmanreview.com/local/story_txt.asp?date=041804&ID=s1510999
“‘Most of us view Bush a little wishy-washy on the Second Amendment, but it’s no contest: John Kerry is a tremendous threat. He may pose as a duck hunter but his record in Congress speaks for itself.’”

No, apparently the imminent and clear threat to quail hunters isn’t John Kerry, it’s the Vice-President with an errant shotgun.

Let’s hope that the guy he shot turns out okay.

Less vitriolic thread here.

Well, after all. Harry had it coming. At least, according to the spokeswoman

I love this bit:

Didn’t get in his eyes? He was shot, you numb gint! It isn’t like the buckshot was coated with draincleaner.

Am I the only one who thinks it’s oogy that the VP goes on canned hunts? Who the hell needs to shoot over 400 birds to have a good time?

Since they were hunting quail, it it pretty certain that he was shooting birdshot, not buckshot. It does make a difference.

I wonder if Mr. Whittington was actually allowed to carry his own weapon in the presence of the Secret Service? (And maybe we should assign the Secret Service to defend other people whenever the Pres or Veep are armed and dangerous.)

I wonder when we’ll hear from those who were chiding Kerry for his poor gun safety? I recall some thread where the primary issue was one photo of Kerry which may have shown a portion of the end of the barrel of his gun, and may have suggested that the gun was not 100% pointed down-range.

At least he didn’t shoot anyone.

What was he thinking, at 78, Mr. Whittington is way too stringy to eat. :eek: :smiley:

CMC

Cheney: “I’m tired of torturing people – I wanna kill! KILL!!! KILL!!! KILL!!!”

Something my dad used to say:

I would not hurt thee for the world, sir; but thou art standing where I wish to shoot!

You’re our boy!

This kills me. An unfortunate turn of phrase, or evidence of the liberal media bias?

From the article–

See? You can be a Republican and still be a nice guy!

I don’t know if I did chide Kerry for this. And I don’t know if Cheney was operating his gun in an unsafe manner. You seem to be assuming that he was, which seems like quite a big assumption to make at this point.

If Cheney operated his gun in an unsafe manner, it was the wrong thing to do, and he is fortunate in any case that nobody was killed.

True, true. Perhaps the 78 year old man ran out and dove right in front of Cheney’s target.

Preferably yelling “Nooooooooooooo!!!” while he did it.

They don’t call it the Group Dubya bench for nothin’. :smiley:

Mr. Whittington clearly knows too much.

Or, as one buzzard said to the other…

:smiley:

I’ll admit that I find myself mildly amused by Cheney’s involvement in something like this, but I question whether it’s pitworthy. Rather than make any further assumptions, though, I’ll be perfectly naive and ask: why the pit?

Truth be told hunting quail is a situation where the hunters typically follow their quarry with their sights and then fire, that’s why when you’re out hunting you should make sure that if anyone is with you that none of you are possibly in the line of fire of anyone else.

Cheney was being an unsafe hunter, but so was Whittington and the hunting party in general from what I’ve read.