The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Cafe Society

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2006, 07:49 PM
Boyo Jim Boyo Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 28,630
Who is this minor character in "The Mouse that Roared"

There is a scene in the movie that shows something like a version of the Telephone game, where a message passed on from one person to the next is exaggerated and distorted. It is supposed to represent how reports of a few guys in chain mail armor in Central Park got turned into rumors of a Martian invasion of thousands.

The scene ends with what seems designed as some kind of visual pun, which I don't get because I don't recognize the person. The second to last person in the chain turns to him and says something like, "Thousands of Martians in Central Park!", and the fuy replied, "I know, I know." Then the is a brief lingering closup of the guy. It seems as this is some actor doing a cameo appearance, and we are supposed to recognizr him from some other role he had in some alien sci-fi or horror flick.

He looks somewhat like Tony Perkins, but I can can't find any link between his name and the movie name. And if it IS Perkins, what movie are we supposed to be reminded of?

Any true Peter Sellars movie geeks out there?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 09-02-2006, 07:58 PM
Johnny L.A. Johnny L.A. is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: NoWA
Posts: 44,819
Alas, that's one of the DVDs I left at home.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2006, 08:16 PM
Alistair McCello Alistair McCello is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
They zoom in close on the character because you are supposed to recognize him as one of the men that encountered the chainmailed soldiers in Central Park, one of the fellows wearing radiation suits. In the previous scene he had been forced down into the shelter by the troops in the streets because they thought he was a civilian since he had taken off the radiation suit.

Problem is that you barely see the character out of his radiation suit before the telephone game scene so it is hard to recognize him.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2006, 09:07 PM
ftg ftg is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
I watched this last night on TCM. It's been, well, a "few" years since I last saw it.

Went to IMDB to look up all the minor actors I spotted but the listing is quite incomplete. (And loaded with those baloney "scenes deleted" entries. Sheesh.)

Lots of the standard "Shepperton late 1950s" crew. (Including the little bald guy from "Benny Hill" in the Fenwick army.) Imagine watching "Love Actually" forty years from now: "Hey, isn't that That Guy from That Thing?" or "Wasn't he a Dr. Who?"

The American cast outside of the principals was even less recognizable. I don't think there's any chance of getting an ID on the decontamination/telephone game guy.

Off-topic notes:

Jean Seaberg. Beautiful, tragic life, terrible comic actress.
Leo McKern. One of the all time greats in comedy and drama.
The guy who played Mountjoy was good. Not so much the guy who played Tully or the ugly gal who played the Grand Duchess.

Not a "big" film by any means, but a timeless classic.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-02-2006, 09:39 PM
Johnny L.A. Johnny L.A. is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: NoWA
Posts: 44,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by ftg
Not a "big" film by any means...
Well, The Duchy of Grand Fenwick isn't a very big place after all.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-02-2006, 10:18 PM
Boyo Jim Boyo Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 28,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alistair McCello
They zoom in close on the character because you are supposed to recognize him as one of the men that encountered the chainmailed soldiers in Central Park, one of the fellows wearing radiation suits. In the previous scene he had been forced down into the shelter by the troops in the streets because they thought he was a civilian since he had taken off the radiation suit.

Problem is that you barely see the character out of his radiation suit before the telephone game scene so it is hard to recognize him.
That's probably it, and I didn't see that part of the movie the other night -- I tuned in later. Though I've seen it several times, I didn't consider an appearance in an earlier scene.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-03-2006, 05:58 AM
C K Dexter Haven C K Dexter Haven is offline
Right Hand of the Master
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Chicago north suburb
Posts: 14,678
Now that Alistair has nailed it, I remember the scene and concur. That's the joke.

It's a cute little movie, but you ought to read the book!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-03-2006, 10:28 AM
Johnny L.A. Johnny L.A. is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: NoWA
Posts: 44,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by C K Dexter Haven
Now that Alistair has nailed it, I remember the scene and concur. That's the joke.
I remember now too.

I like this sort of film. Not only the comedies, but many of the other films of the era. Granted, they were made before I was born; but I still caught a lot of them on TV when I was growing up. (Aside: Anyone remember The Family Film Festival on KTLA-5, hosted by 'Popeye' Tom Hatten?) I think a lot of people who wouldn't normally watch 1950s bedroom comedies, capers, satires, etc. would like them if they gave them a chance.

A case in point: The director of our aborted film is 29. He likes modern rap and hard rock. He likes violent films (he favourite is Léon -- a really, really good film IMO). One Wednesday Night Barbecue we decided to watch The Mouse That Roared on DVD. It surprised me that he'd asked to see it. As we watched he said, 'Why don't they make movies like this anymore?' Totally not the kind of film I'd think of him liking!

I think it would be fun to make a film in the late-'50s/early-'60s style. It would be so different from today's style it might just be refreshing. (Or it could be an utter failure. But I'd like to try.) I have the title sequence written.

And to back up ftg, Jean Seberg was a total hottie. She was good in Breathless too.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-03-2006, 01:11 PM
Boyo Jim Boyo Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 28,630
Well, then let me list a few other small British comedies that I kind of lump together with TMTR. They all seem to be about big powers/people trying to crush little powers/people, but they can't quite manage somehow.

Passport to Pimlico -- an ancient royal charter is found that grants a bit of London to a minor royal. The residents find the descendent and declare an independent kingdom. The British government blockades the neighborhood to try forcing them back into the fold. Really witty, lots of fun. I don't think there's anyone in it I've ever heard of.

The Man in the White Suit -- Alec Guiness plays a chemist who develops an indestructible fabric that repels all dirt and liquids. Everyone in the garment industry promptly begins trying to destroy him to protect their jobs -- management and union leaders alike.

Let's Kill Uncle -- A boy inherits his father's estate. His uncle tells him straight out that he will kill the boy to get his money, but other adults don't believe him. The boy amd jis girlfriend have the bright idea to kil Uncle FIRST. The whole move is basically ambushes and close escapes.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-03-2006, 01:36 PM
Tapioca Dextrin Tapioca Dextrin is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Staring blankly at my GPS
Posts: 10,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boyo Jim
Passport to Pimlico I don't think there's anyone in it I've ever heard of.
You didn't recognise Magaret Rutherford? She was the Professor who authenticated the treaty.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-03-2006, 02:41 PM
rowrrbazzle rowrrbazzle is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Not Hermione Baddeley? She was the larger maid in the movie "Mary Poppins" and appeared on numerous sitcoms.

Not Stanley Holloway? Eliza's father in "My Fair Lady"?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-03-2006, 02:45 PM
Boyo Jim Boyo Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 28,630
OK, OK, I'm not an expert on British Film. Yes, I saw My Fair Lady and Mary Poppins. I'm sure I've seen Margaret Rutherford in something. Ahe always played some kind of sweet doddering old lady, right?

Sheesh, forgive me for making an adlib comment.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-03-2006, 03:21 PM
Johnny L.A. Johnny L.A. is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: NoWA
Posts: 44,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boyo Jim
The Man in the White Suit -- Alec Guiness plays a chemist who develops an indestructible fabric that repels all dirt and liquids. Everyone in the garment industry promptly begins trying to destroy him to protect their jobs -- management and union leaders alike.
Man, I haven't seen that one in like 20 years! I'll have to pick it up for the collection.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-03-2006, 06:17 PM
kittenblue kittenblue is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 6,168
Amazingly, I've only seen The Mouse That Roared as a stage production in junior high, when I fell madly in love with the ninth-grader who played Tully! Must now Google him and see whatever became of him! Of course, now you've given me more films to add to my daughter's Netflix lineup.......
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-03-2006, 06:48 PM
Musicat Musicat is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sturgeon Bay, WI USA
Posts: 14,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by C K Dexter Haven
It's a cute little movie, but you ought to read the book!
Better yet, read some of author Leonard Wibberley's other books. Although he wrote at least two sequels, The Mouse on The Moon and the Mouse on Wall Street, I think his Mouse stories are not his best writing. My personal favorites are The Elephant Boy (no relation to the Elephant Man or the Kipling story/movie) and A Feast of Freedom. Both are excellent satires on political science and philosophy, but, alas, are out of print.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-03-2006, 07:40 PM
Boyo Jim Boyo Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 28,630
The Mouse on the Moon was also filmed, though it didn't have nearly the charm or wit of the first film.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-04-2006, 11:03 AM
Polycarp Polycarp is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A better place to be
Posts: 26,685
Was it Wibberly who wrote The Short Reign of Pippin IV, or am I just mixing up two royal-comedic novels I read at about the same time (about age 12, as I remember)?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-04-2006, 11:15 AM
Musicat Musicat is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sturgeon Bay, WI USA
Posts: 14,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polycarp
Was it Wibberly who wrote The Short Reign of Pippin IV, or am I just mixing up two royal-comedic novels I read at about the same time (about age 12, as I remember)?
This one, by Steinbeck?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-04-2006, 12:44 PM
postcards postcards is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The other Long Beach.
Posts: 3,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny L.A.
...I think it would be fun to make a film in the late-'50s/early-'60s style. It would be so different from today's style it might just be refreshing. (Or it could be an utter failure. But I'd like to try.) I have the title sequence written.
Don't the Austin Powers movies count?
__________________
Talking Pictures
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-04-2006, 02:02 PM
Johnny L.A. Johnny L.A. is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: NoWA
Posts: 44,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by postcards
Don't the Austin Powers movies count?
No. I'm talking about the 'look' of the film, not the characters.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-04-2006, 02:11 PM
RealityChuck RealityChuck is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Schenectady, NY, USA
Posts: 32,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny L.A.
I think it would be fun to make a film in the late-'50s/early-'60s style. It would be so different from today's style it might just be refreshing. (Or it could be an utter failure. But I'd like to try.) I have the title sequence written.
They tried it recently with Down with Love, but they did it in a jokey and ironic manner that showed a lot of contempt for the material.
__________________
"One never knows, do one?"
Provider of quality fantasy and science fiction since 1982.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-04-2006, 02:21 PM
Boyo Jim Boyo Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 28,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealityChuck
They tried it recently with Down with Love, but they did it in a jokey and ironic manner that showed a lot of contempt for the material.
That's the one I was trying to think of-- with Ewan NacGregor and Rene Zelwiger. Yeah, it sucked.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-04-2006, 04:38 PM
Johnny L.A. Johnny L.A. is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: NoWA
Posts: 44,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealityChuck
They tried it recently with Down with Love, but they did it in a jokey and ironic manner that showed a lot of contempt for the material.
I haven't seen it. I've just taken a very brief look at the IMDb page though. It says it's set in 1962, and is an homage to the early-'60s sex comedies. The images on the page do have that certain 'look'. The trailer seems to have the 'look', but it's a little hard to tell the way it's cut.

But if it's done in a 'jokey and ironic' manner, then that's not what I'm looking for. My experiment wouldn't be a period piece, BTW. Back in the day, movie equipment was much heavier and bulkier than it is today. There were fewer camera movements. Zoom lenses were in use, but they weren't as prevalent. Now, a nice slow zoom is an excellent technique. But it still seems a little 'modern' for my purposes.

Another thing was lighting. Decades ago film was not as sensitive as today's film. A lot of scenes were seriously overlit by modern standards. Annd they didn't seem to be as concerned with shadows back then. In Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds, as the first example that popped into my head, there are obvious multiple shadows everywhere. A lot of effort goes into lighting today to eliminate shadows. In The Birds Hitchcock seemed more concerned with the acting and the story than the lighting. I grew up -- at least fromwhen I started noticing things like lighting -- with films that tended toward realism in their shots. Lighting had to have a source, and you didn't want too many shadows on the wall if you could help it. I think this might be the hardest part about making a film in a retro style: having just the right amount of shadows.

What I'd like to do is make a film set in the present day, only using the classic techniques. I want to use establishing shots and panoramas like they used to use. I don't want too much camera movement. (But I also don't want it to be static.) I want the film to be carried along by the story and the acting instead of rapidfire cutting and the types of shots that modern audiences are used to.

Would people like it? I don't know. I'm sure many people wouldn't understand my intention and hate it. But it's still something I'd like to try.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.