The movie Zeitgeist is trying to ruin friendships

(This is my first post/thread so be kind)

So I have been a lurker on these boards for quite a long time and I have recently had the enjoyment :rolleyes: of reading about the giant hoax that is the holocaust and the bullshit that was being thrown around gave me flashbacks to some heated arguments I have had with a couple of friends that seriously endangered our friendships.

It all started about six months ago when one friend told me I should see this movie called Zeitgeist and that it will blow my mind and disprove everything I thought to be true in my entire life. This particular friend has a knack for hyperbole so I threw the statement to the side and didn’t bother. Within the week I had another friend tell me about this life changing movie that everyone should see because it will change your entire view on life. Now I am a little curious, TWO claims of a life changing experiences in a WEEK? Maybe I should read a little bit about this movie…

Well I did some elementary research (wikipedia) and found out that it’s basically a conspiracy theory movie that supposedly reveals the truth of three subjects: Religion, 9/11, and our national banking system. Although I have major issues with all three parts, the one that came close to destroying my faith in people was the part that tried to prove that 9/11 was an elaborate, planned attack by the American Government. The planes didn’t destroy the twin towers, it was destroyed by explosives set under the building and they had pictures to prove it.

What? This was what was creating the life changing experience with my friends? That can’t be… Well they aren’t the brightest bunch so maybe a little discussion will set them in order and in having this discussion I will have successfully fought ignorance and made the world a bit of a better place. So I went to them and talked to them about it, get a feel for how much they took out of the 9/11 conspiracy theory, because who knows? maybe in the heat of the moment they bought what the movie was selling but upon further review realized the error of their ways… If only this were the case.

So upon my questioning they proceed to throw these seemingly indisputable facts at me, basically regurgitating the movie at me and I realized I had nothing to refute these claims. It was a verbal massacre. I KNOW what they are saying is false but I didn’t know how to undeniably disprove their claims. I had this same feeling upon reading the holocaust thread. Junior Spaceman put it my situation quite well in the holocaust sister pit thread.

So I may have lost that round, but I refused to lose the war. I attempted to arm myself with a wealth of knowledge, my primary source being this website that seemed that it would be able to do the trick. So I went back into the battle arena with some new weapons, but it did not turn out as I had expected. They had smoking guns, IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE. They had well rehearsed, bullet point style arguments. I had a counter website that looked great on paper but in practice was extremely hard to utilize. The sources I came out with were under great scrutiny and it was seemingly impossible to prove my side beyond a shadow of a doubt.

(A little of an aside but as I went through that website it actually disappointed me a bit. After reading a lot of the site I decided to humor myself and check one of the sources link and it turned out to be a broken link… Ok that seems reasonable there a lot of sources cited throughout the website so one broken link seems reasonable. So I decide to check another and it turns out to be some geocities style website. Not quite the irrefutable source I hoped for. Check a third cite, wikipedia. I trust much of what wikipedia says but that would be eaten up if I tried to throw wikipedia in the mix it’s so easy to argue the legitimacy of wikipedia and throwing that in the mix would have spawned a whole new debate altogether. It started feeling less and less like my smoking gun after all these incidents.)

So after a few more rounds I gave up trying to show them the error of their ways, it felt like a futile effort on my part and our discussions got pretty viscious near the end and in both sides frustration insults were thrown about and nobody was winning so we both sort of silently called off the debate. It was not fun but I feel like I failed in fighting ignorance, I failed Cecil, and what’s worse is I feel this disease spreading across the globe where more and more people seem to have seen this movie and have had their lives changed or minds blown and ignorance is spreading. More and more friends have seen it and I try to poke around and find the ones that are a little more cynical about it and show them the light but they are few and far between.

So with all this said I pit ignorance and that damn Zeitgeist movie that almost destroyed my friendships and is still a bit of a white elephant in the room when we are hanging out. I also am looking to reach out and find any others who may have had similar issues and feel as though they are fighting what seems to be a futile fight and let them know they are not alone.

You’re supposed to use the white elephant’s trunk.

Now fuck off, spamming troll.

Get smarter friends.

Actually, I’d have thought there needed to be more than one post to constitute spamming. Perhaps you’d like to point out which of these definitions apply to BC’s post.

It is a procedure of abusing the normal search engine ranking techniques, such as using hidden text, excessive repetition of a keyword, etc. …

www.linking101.com/articles/terms.htm

Using any search engine ranking technique which causes a degradation in the quality of the results produced by the search engines. …

www.anubazaar.com/Glossary.htm

Excessive manipulation to influence search engine rankings, often for pages which contain little or no relevant content

is the abuse of electronic messaging systems to indiscriminately send unsolicited bulk messages. While the most widely recognized form of spam is e-mail spam, the term is applied to similar abuses in other media: instant messaging spam, Usenet newsgroup spam, Web search engine spam, spam in …

www.wysiwicked.com/encyclopedia/

An obnoxious practice of mass advertising to clients through e-mail, IRC, a browser, or any other communication device.

www.mantis.biz/glossary

Blaze Networks has zero tolerance for UBE/UCE (unsolicited bulk email/unsolicited commercial email). This policy protects our customers as well as the Internet community from the negative effects of “spam” related activity. …

blz.in/User-Policy.html

Spamming refers to using different unethical tactics to achieve high search engine rankings. Such spamming tactics include bulk submitting …

Email spamming is when people send out large batches of emails (mail shots) to unknown recipients. This is similar to ‘junk mail’ you get through the post. Search engine spamming is used by people trying to improve their rankings by repetitive use of keywords and submissions.

www.leapinghare.co.uk/help/glossary.html

Spamming search engines is the term used to describe any attempts by Website publishers to disrupt the work of the search engine spiders in order to confuse the relevancy algorithm and optimize the site’s ranking.

www.dottraffic.com/glossary/

ie the unsolicited sending of electronic mail messages is also prohibited and the Customer warrants and represents that there will be no practice …

www.xeonext.com/terms-of-use.html

Bulk emailing of unsolicited mail.

sensacom.com/web_glossary.html

no “unsolicited e-mail” or ‘SPAM’ may be sent from any Aus-e server.That is, any electronic mail sent to a given list of address(es) for which the owner(s) have not given permission, express or otherwise, for the Customer’s use in mass communication.

www.aus-e.com/tos.htm

1. The use of redundant or unethical techniques to improve search engine placement and give irrelevant pages high search engine ranking. 2. To send unsolicited or unwanted messages.

www.redcarpetweb.com/manager6.html

Posting unsolicited messages to forums or by email.

wiki.mariah.com/2007/06/22/glossary-of-information-technology-terms-for-the-mortgage-industry/

A more general term that involves sending unwanted commercial email messages to random email addresses.

www.harvestseo.com/seo-glossary-s.html

Mostly used in the context of email, where unsolicited email is distributed en masse to people who mostly don’t want to receive it. Some say spam email is killing the internet, with some inboxes getting clogged up with hundreds of spam emails daily. …

www.searchpath.co.uk/Resources/InternetMarketingGlossary.html

The mass distribution of unsolicited E-mail messages or inappropriate Newsgroup postings. Spamming sometimes involves sending a single E-mail message to tens of thousands of recipients, both individuals and those subscribing to Newsgroups.

www.ccountry.net/support/

Is often viewed as the act of sending unsolicited email. This multiple or vast emailing is often compared to mass junk mailings.

Refers to unsolicited junk email. Kinda like the brochures you keep getting in your mail.

www.w3-hosting.net/resources/web-hosting-glossary.html

Over submission of Web pages, hidden text, creating many pages or sites with the same content, and repeating keywords. Search engines penalize or ban pages and sites using these techniques.

www.epowermark.com/glossary.htm

Or am I spamming now? :dubious:

The hell?

What the fuck… ? This is the way to treat a new guest?

I don’t get it.

I are suggesting the OP is trying to promote some new website here? "cause I don’t see it…

What? I don’t know how I might be spamming or how I am a troll. This is a genuine issue that I deal with and was looking for other peoples thoughts.

Seriously what the fuck? I was about to let this go but what a fucking douchebag thing to do. I had spent a long time lurking these boards because I always thought there was some interesting discussions and seemed pretty friendly and looked like a place for intelligent discussion which is a hard thing to find in internet forums. I was always afraid of being eaten up alive so even when the boards went free I was reluctant to post. so finally after a couple of months of contemplation I decide man up and register so I can put in my two cents on a subject I am pretty serious about and this is the first fucking reply I get. You are a goddamn douchebag thanks for making someone feel welcome.

Just because I am new does not mean I am a troll.

To the OP.

One, you could read the 9/11 Commission Report.

Two, you could hit your friends with a baseball bat.

Three - If i were you, I’d Pit hawthorne.

Seriously?! This guy doesn’t appear to be spamming or trolling in the least.

Just remember, you can’t reason someone out of a position they didn’t reason themselves into. Sadly, it’s probably a lost cause.

Buddha, welcome to the boards, and sorry for your horrid welcome. I read through your whole OP. There is nothing to be done about such people, I’m afriad. Better just to ignore it or go the baseball bat route Zebra mentions.

Ha, like the 9/11 Commission Report would prove to them anything. That’s straight from the belly of the beast as far as they are concerned.

You guys are mostly right about the sentiments that it is at best a lost cause and I should let it go (which in the end we both did). The fact that this is an issue without any real answers is why I felt this was meant for the pit in the first place, first and foremost this was a vent of my frustrations.

No, it’s an issue with very REAL answers. Your buddies just don’t like them and would rather live in a fantasy world. But when fighting the good fight it’s sometimes better to make a strategic withdrawal.

And, not to pile on, welcome,** Buddha **and fuck off Hawthorne.

Can I get the TLDR version of the text walls here?

of course I meant to say “are you suggesting…” I am not suggesting he’s spamming at all!

  • Borrow their The Wire season 5 boxed set
  • “Sorry bud but the International Bankers took it off me”
  • Vote Ron Paul

I agree.

Didn’t we have a thread here a while back about how the reason that some people like to believe in these elaborate conspiracy theories that only they see through is that it makes them feel like they’re smarter than everybody else?

I agree with this too.

I’ve never had the stomach to watch Zeitgeist past the first five minutes. But here’s the summary of my objections to the ideas behind 2/3 of it.

The Jesus myth stuff is a thoroughly debunked rehash of the delusions of 19th century freethinkers who tried to link Christianity to every Solar & Nature religion out there. They either invented links which did not exist or believed that latter Christian-influences aspects of those religions actually preceded Christianity.

9/11- IF it was an inside job, and “The Truth is Out There”, then not only are Bush & the Neo-Cons major villians, but also the vast majority of liberal Democrat politicians who KNOW “The Truth” yet refuse to denounce Bush. Obama & Hillary & Biden & even Dennis Kucinich are all accessories to this evil “Hoax of the 21st Century”.

I don’t know the extent of the Federal Reserve-Income Tax-New World Order stuff in the film. I’d probably agree with it to an extent, though I would regard it as more a “corporate statist social-democracy establishment” than a diabolical Orwellian conspiracy. That’s one of the reasons I’m no longer a Bircher.