[QUOTE=newcrasher]
I am down to a daily allowance of 24 points and I am always hungry. I am going to the gym 4 or 5 times a week, running and doing weight training as well as mixing in some isometric stuff like lunges and abwork. Yet the weight is sorta hanging on. I am a little discouraged. Evern the activity points aren’t sating my appetite.
[/QUOTE]
I don’t think it’s a good idea to eat LESS while INCREASING your activity over an extended period of time. Your body isn’t built for it.
Think about it. What causes weight gain? You take in more calories than you expend. This weight can be gained either as muscle or fat, depending on your activity. First your body will use it to build/repair muscle cells as needed; what’s left over is stored as fat. Most people intuitively understand this.
But assuming you have too much fat, you need to lose it. What causes weight loss? Expending more calories than you take in.
But the weight loss can again be lost as either muscle or fat. This is what people do not intuitively understand: just as the body first builds muscle before storing fat, it will eventually enter a mode of eating the muscle before fat after a sustained (significant) calorie deficit. This is rather dramatically called “starvation mode”, as it is presumably how our prehistoric ancestors evolved to survive long periods of low food availability: by stretching out the most efficient form of stored energy (body fat) to last longer by making its retention a priority.
This is the basis for the common phenomenon of “yo-yo dieting”. Most people’s approach to losing unwanted fat is to “lose weight” by “going on a diet”. This often works great at first, a period of a couple of weeks, then, the progress stops as the body goes into “conservation mode” (aka “starvation mode”).
This also makes them lethargic and harder to keep up higher levels of activity. They may even become LESS active to compensate for the lower energy levels (a natural reaction). Eventually the dieter gives up, or reaches the “target weight” and deems the diet “over”, and eats a normal amount again… Which results in weight gain, since their metabolism has been permanently lowered due to lower lean mass and activity levels.
What’s the answer? As Tom Venuto described in the title of his excellent book, Burn The Fat, Feed The Muscle! Don’t “starve the fat”… “Burn” the fat with activity, and “feed” the muscle with an appropriate caloric support level and weight training. In his book, he advisese not cut your calories below a 20% deficit at most from “maintenance” while factoring in your activity level. Do the calculations and you’ll likely find you’re eating way too LITTLE for the amount of activity you’re doing.
And if you reach a point where you find you’re eating too little for the activity level you’re maintaining… Don’t slack off, eat more! After all, it’s much harder to ratchet up your activity level once it goes back down, than it would be to simply eat more, which you already naturally want to do, right?
There’s a whole lot of standard advice in his book as well about eating better (e.g., avoiding refined carbs and trans fats in favor of whole grains and “good” fats), and eating more frequent smaller meals throughout the day to keep the metabolism up. But more than anything else, he is very practical and not “religious” about any of his advice. “Do what works” is the maxim; everybody is different and will react differently to diet and exercise programs. Some people can get away with exercising less or eating less perfect than others, who need nearly perfect rigor to make any headway. Find your “zone” and work within it.
Following his advice I have been very happy in losing 46 lbs. over the past 7 months, dropping my body fat percentage from 31.5% to 18.5%, and have almost hit my year-end goals for body fat and weight. As I’ve approached my year-end goals I admit I’ve allowed myself more “cheating”, which has retarded my progress but not halted it completely, which I’ve decided is a perfectly good way to enjoy my holidays!