**
I could retort that you are trying not to see what is there, but that remark would be as meaningless as yours. Instead I’ll just point out specific things that I see as relevant. I love it when people string together chains of logic that don’t show any logical connection, like: “there is a civil war so terrorism is expected.” I don’t know if this is some mindless line that some official fed to the press but it just doesn’t follow logically. In a civil war two parties or forces battle with one another for control of a nation. Why would terrorism directed at another nation altogether be inherent in civil war? Terrorism is, however, what you would expect of a group fighting against a much stronger power that they know they are unable to challenge in outright warfare.
As for your attempts to assert what I see (“that the US is an evil empire…”), I could assume that you just misunderstand where I’m coming from, but since I’ve been over it at length, I know that you do know better. I can therefore only assume that you are resorting to twisting my views into something irrational as opposed to finding any logical premise to challenge it. To restate my view: The American political system, because it inherently fosters corruption, consists largely of representatives that have been corrupted to some degree. The elected representatives are corrupted by the extremely wealthy and essentially owned and run by the election campaign contributors. This inevitably breeds actions that understandably lead to America being perceived as an “Evil Empire” but in fact it is the smallest minority that are evil or corrupt that are in positions of influence. America at large consists primarily of benevolent and productive people. If only they were in the Whitehouse.
Before I comment any further on this how about you demonstrate that this money is actually being doled out to the people. I’m not necessarily contesting the fact but I’m not going to debate something that I haven’t seen happen. If you can link a press photo of all that cash being handed out or something, let me know. Until then I can only assume that it is more empty PR drivel designed to garner unqualified support for this foolishness in Iraq.
I will one more time explain my stance that the American government cannot claim moral superiority over Iraq’s ex-regime. Here’s a dictionary definition of morals: moral: [pl.] principles, standards, or habits with respect to right or wrong in conduct; ethics; sometimes, specif., standards of sexual behavior. IMHO if one person/state does something which transgresses the boundary of right and does something wrong, then that person or state has no claim to moral superiority over another who commits an equally wrong act. Forgetting anything else that the US government has done over the years that could be cited as wrong, just the simple fact that the US supported and condoned Iraq’s policies and atrocities over the years, right up to and including the invasion of Kuwait, makes my point. Saddam and America were allies for the longest time. Do you think the CIA wasn’t aware of what Saddam got up to?
Yes America has produced much advancement for mankind. This is a credit to American industry. These advancements were made by Americans with drive and vision and were made in spite of a government that rarely has the interests of the greater population at heart.
Getting back to the subject of the thread, “9/11 why us,” the notion that America was attacked because of cultural differences is the type of childish mung that Bush has pushed because it does not require any review of action on the part of his administration; it does not require him to bite the bullet and see how he needs to change how he runs the nation. But I doubt that I will change your mind on the issue. It is your own responsibility to search beyond Whitehouse press conferences and CNN for what might be going on in the world around you.