Oh, he’ll have sex again, and again, and again every day for the rest of his life if he’s found guilty.
Except it won’t be to a 14-year-old girl. Closer to a 6’6, 250 pound guy with a 12-inch dick named Giver, and a another guy, about the same height and weight, except with a dick 2 inches longer and a huge, muscular arm named Fister.
I hear you-plus, I work with the victim’s sister, so I heard about it before it even hit the news. (From their other sister, who also worked at Kmart at the time).
The whole thing is fucking INCREDIBLE.
Oh man. Even when I was 14 I didn’t want to have sex with a 14 year old (I had my eyes set on the older ladies of 16). I can’t even wrap my brain around having sex with a 14 year old girl. Esp a 14 year old girl holding a baby.
Now I have the heebeejeebees.
IIIIICK!
[wishful thinking]
DEATH OF A SALESMAN
Pittsburgh, PA Deon Bowens, 26, serving a twenty-year sentence for sexual assault, was found hanging by a sheet in his cell at Pennsylvania State Correctional Institution yesterday. Bowens had been disembowelled, and his intestines were depending into a bucket filled with his own excrement. Prison officials and the public-at-large remain singularly uninterested in investigating his death. Penn State Warden George Hill explained, “Bowens wasn’t wearing underwear at the time of the killing.” AP
[/wishful thinking]
My WAG is that the point of having her hold the baby was so that that she wouldn’t struggle quite so much while he got his pants down. As such, it was a tactical decision by the creep rather than an erotic fantasy.
And, has been said, if he’s indeed guilty of this, may he burn in hell.
the underwear thing never fails to amaze me. Hell I never wear underwear (don’t own any) and I don’t want sex from ANYONE! How going commando is equated with wanting sex is just beyond me.
I’m with you there, OpalCat! Because I don’t wear underwear, I’m ready’n’raring to go with anyone and everyone?!
They said underwear, not underpants. Maybe it was a brassiere that she lacked; that would be more noticeable than the absence of panties. Not that that makes any damn difference..
As I read it, this was a * preliminary hearing* (not trial) in which the issue of consent was in dispute and where there is no apparent mention of whether the age of the girl was known, requested, offered or otherwise made known to the accused.
You can paint the brief details of this any number of ways. Examples:
Girl in charge of house has conversation and demonstration of wares on doorstep, does she tell him or make known her absence of underwear (question goes to flirtation) ? why is no one in the house aware of what happens ?, girl phones mother about purchases of goods, girl takes water to the front door where man remains, man comes inside, sex occurs, girl does nothing for two days before telling a friend. Attention-seeking Lolita ?
(NB. “… tried to soothe and calm the girl as she clutched a Teddy bear. Throughout the proceeding, the teen-ager used her finger tips to press her eyelids in failed attempts to fight back the tears as she sobbed quietly… Long, thick, red locks frequently hung to the side of her head, shielding her face from the accused.”)
Man forces his way into house, rapes 14 year-old girl and leaves. Paedophile-Rapist ?
{NB. " Only once or twice did Bowens sneak a glance in her direction, even when she pointed in his direction to identify him as her attacker. Instead, he stared, expressionless, straight ahead.").
Helpful and objective reporting ?
My only point is that reading this only allows us to pre-judge the trial. If there is one cardinal rule in criminal cases, IMHO, it’s that how things unfold in court reads very differently in a newspaper.
He doesn’t deny sex took place so it is Statutory Rape (23 year old, 14 year old) …beyond that, who knows.