A 18 year old Indian boy disapproves Einstein's theories???

It’s incredible! But true. An Indian boy in his twelfth standard has
disproved Einstein’s “Theory of Relativity”, and has been shortlisted for the Nobel Prize !!!

Sudarshan Reddy has theoretically proven the existence of a sub-atomic particle which can travel at speeds greater than that of light, thereby challenging one of the fundamental postulates of the “Theory of Relativity”. In his recent research paper submitted to the “Institute of Advanced Physics (IAP)” at Trieste, (Italy) Sudarshan has proved the existence of a class of sub-atomic particles called ‘leptons’, which can travel faster than light. The international physics community has been shell shocked by this discovery. Dr.Massimo Martelli, President of the IAP has this to say about the paper submitted by Sudarshan : " After a long, careful and critical analysis, I can confidently say that Sudarshan 's research paper show a tremendous leap in our underderstanding of physics as his investigation mounts up on ‘leptons’. His work builds substantially on the work of Einstein and others in the Field of relativity.

When physicists from Princeton University tried to measure Sudarshan’s
IQ with an IQ-meter (at the American embassy in Delhi), the meter broke
down, simply because it was not calibrated to measure such high IQ. This was reported in ‘Times of India’(An Indian leading newspaper’). Prof.Carl Uppsala, Chairman of the Nobel sub-committee for physics has confirmed that Sudarshan has been shortlisted for the Nobel prize in physics for the year 2001.

There’s a general question where here?

Sounds like bullshit to me.

Oh No!!! The IQ meter at the American Embassy is broken! How will they conduct affairs of state without one?

Of course we all know that Leptons exist and are faster than the speed of light. Just ask any high school girl who’s been on a date.

Mom: “How was your date with Fat Tony last night, dear? Did he act like a gentleman?”

Daughter:“No, Mom. He lepton me faster than the speed of light!”

Hmm . . .

Damnit, Whammo, beat me to it!

However. Here’s another link that may help out some as well.

Aw curse you, Whammo! I just got back from that very same site and was all set to be the pioneer on this thread. :mad:

I say we chuck this jayshah off the board for posting ULs in GQ.

Since we’re on the subject, there apparently is no sub-committee for physics on the Nobel Prize Committee. Here is the Straight Dope on how the Nobel Committee selects who gets the prize each year.

“Uppsala”, indeed. Hell, why not get an American physicist named Tony Sacramento in there, while we’re at it?

This sounds like an urban legend to me.

Hypothetical particles that travel faster than light are ‘tachyons’, not ‘leptons’. Leptons travel slower than light.

An IQ ‘meter’? This sounds suspicious–a test would be more believable.

Can you provide a reference to the Times of India article (date, issue, etc)? A search at the Times site only yielded an unreachable page.

A Google search on “Sudarshan Reddy” yielded mostly Indian and physics discussion sites with very similar copies of the message.
Example

A reply to that example cited http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/indiansciencewhiz.htm which says that… the message is a hoax.

Ack. You guys got there first… curse the slowness of the board.

I WIN! I WIN!!! WHOO HOO for once I win!

:D:D:D:D:D

Leptons are a well-established family of particles comprised of the electron, muon, tau, electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tau neutrino. They are one of the two types of fundamental constituents of matter (the other being quarks). They have been known for many years and travel slower than the speed of light.

-b

Are IQ Meters taken orally or anally? Do you have to leave them in for the full two minutes to register a reading? Do you have to hold it up to a lamp?

Serously, my friends and I used to joke about shoving IQ meters up peoples asses and watching the mercury drop. One inside joke we have is when the conversation turns from “already-petty” to “absolutely assenine”, one of us will say “Hey, I think the mercury is dropping again.”

Somebody always said “Yeah, I’m cold too.”

And now, back to the regularly scheduled bullshit!

After reading this very carefully, it’s not entirely wrong, except for the names, dates and places.

Leptons can travel faster than light. Evidence of this did lead to a Nobel prize in Physics … in 1958.

Unfortunately, Pavel Cerenkov isn’t around to beat these guys over the head with their IQ-meters.

Also, the Physics community doesn’t get shell-shocked anymore – they get orbital-shocked.
On the whole, I disapprove of this sort of thing.

<nitpick>
Okay, okay, faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, ~300 000 km/s. Sigh.
</nitpick>

Yes, yes panamajack, let’s not confuse anyone here. Cerenkov Radiation is caused by particles moving faster than the speed of light in a medium. Relativity states that nothing with mass can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, which still holds true in all known cases (with the possible exception of the hypothetical tachyon already mentioned, but let’s not get into that here).

-b

The “IQ meter” is simply a counting program that measures how many times someone forwards e-mail messages like the above to someone else.

I don’t think panamajack has confused anyone. Besides, he brought up a real physical fact (something totally lacking in the OP), made a great joke (shell/orbital? Cool.), and pointed out another reason to make fun of jayshah (the thread title).

Sometime in the next 20 years the perfect oppurtunity to steal this line and make it my own will appear. I want to thank you in advance.

Thanks, Saltire. And be my guest, Manda JO. And here I thought I was going to get shot for that line.

I wasn’t trying to confuse anyone here. And if they were confused, they should have enough information to find out more. I was pointing out that whoever wrote this in all likelihood knew what they were talking about. Whoever they are, they are probably sitting around laughing at the ignorance of those taken in by their absurd statements, while possibly feeling okay that it’s basically true. I still dislike it.

Just for the record, I wouldn’t normally make fun of someone’s typos, but considering the content, tone, & lack of any inquiry of the OP, that sort of cheap shot seemed okay.

panama jack

We’ve covered everything here, right?