This would amount to:
YES!
What it means:
It is understood that, given our human parameters, I prognosticate (stipulate) that your stated cognition is true.
Comments invited.
Welcome back to adhay.
Aloha
When come back, bring coherence. Thanks for playing.
And 2 U, sir.
Am I incoherent?
Say “yes” and you will must demonstrate your case.
Sir, this is not product embedding. Give it it up, plz.
I think whether they’re attempting to be religious or allegorical is a matter of debate. Of course, there are religious references, Jezebel, the fact that Mary has to “carry her shame well pass all those eyes across the avenue,” blind-eyed Samson, and of course the fact that the baby is predicted to walk on water, but what about Women King? Is it about Hilliary Clinton? Sarah Palin? Simply a pleasant oxymoron given that being a woman precludes someone from being king? (as an aside I first realized that adults lie to you about being able to be “anything” when I got old enough to realize that no matter how good I got at baseball, as someone who has no Y chromosome, would never be allowed to play for the Red Sox, or even the Mets.) And why is everything he had to give her hacked up by hoofmarks? It’s a lot to think about.
A high bar!
I can’t really training for hours in diet mode. interestingly. strength, adequately training for hours. How can trying to meals consuming 5 in 3 weeks, 20lbs, despite the abnormality of eating so many, sleeping, speed and recovery of 4 sets of 4, one set of 5 day splits, 3 weeks and a minimum of 6-8 repped. Now you’re green.
Lot’s of pain and what’s the gain? A touch of green? Is it really worth the effort? I recommend gray, easily come by thru patient idleness.
I’m closing this.
Anyone who wants to start a coherent thread about any of the numerous topics touched upon herein, please feel free to do so. All mashed together in this thread they don’t make sense.