You could design an entire law school ethics course around trump’s lawyers’ behavior since 2016.
I had to steal that one.
I still recall an office safety video that showed the consequences of people not following proper practices (leaving the bottom drawer of a lateral file open so that someone coming around the corner went ass over teakettle and not locking/tagging equipment for maintenance so that someone came within an inch of being electrocuted come to mind). Despite the seriousness of the subject, it a) was hysterically funny and b) made more of an impact than a dry lecture.
Point (if any) being, something similar using the Keystone Kounsels as object lessons may indeed impress potential attorneys to take ethics seriously.
Maybe? With Barney Stinson, perhaps.
PLEASE
PLEASE (Provide Legal Exculpation And Sign Everything )
Which lets her off the hook a bit. She still shouldn’t have signed it.
“Based upon the information that has ben provided to me” by my lying, corrupt brain.
Seriously, since when can a grown up get away with such a childish, meaningless, ambiguous in the extreme phrase? Provided by whom? Provided from where?
Which means she is attesting that Hunter Biden is a serial killer and Trump is still President.
Not only a grown up, but someone who passed the bar.
It seems she hasn’t passed many.
IMHO the bigger question is why the archives/DOJ let them get away with that disclaimer. If I want to know if they returned all the documents and all I get is a note that says “That’s what they tell me.” I’m going to want to know who tells them this, and will that person sign an affirmative statement.
Well yeah, we’re kind of on the same page. 
Trump supporter pleads guilty to fraudulent insurance claims and online fundraisers after he vandalized and set fire to his own house, then blamed it on Antifa and BLM.
For these folks the legal bar is like a limbo bar-how low can you go without touching it bottom? Very few of them have succeeded.
Well, that’s weird. I’m sure I remember reporting saying the statement was that she had personally conducted the search. Was all the early reporting just fooled by the wording?
BREAKING NEWS: Jury says Infowars host Alex Jones should pay $965 million to people who suffered from Sandy Hook lies. Details to come.
BBC link:
j
Before seeing that link, I thought it was a joke. 
Regarding the Jones verdict, I know the judge has to determine how much is affected by CT’s various caps, and that’s before the appeals of course, but one can hope that as Jones tries to grift more money to defend himself / pay off whatever judgements he can’t dodge, it will further hurt the (R) fundraising, as between Jones, the Republicans and Trump’s grifting the wells may eventually run dry, hurting all of the above.
One can hope.
Jones is up to, what, a billion in damages total so far?