That’s where I am – in the 1958-1966 zone.
Unless the boundary is a specific event (such as the end of WWII for the start of the Boomers), the dates are never going to be exact. The Boomers ended around 1962-64, which is when the Pill became widely used. That’s not a very well defined event, so the date is vague.
I’ve heard Generation Alpha for the one following the Zoomers.
Well, that gives us at least 25 other generational labels, so I guess it’s cool.
We’ll always have Hebrew.
I admit they’re annoying, but they still deserve better than a portmanteau.
They probably decided it was too much effort to come up with one, I mean why bother what’s the point.
-Buck Godot born 1971.
“ Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering."
In other words… whatever.
-Airbeck born 1978
We’ll most likely need the zoomers to get back up to around 55% in '24 like they did in '20.
We’ll get there if the gopers run Trump. The youngs hate Trump.
Screw them all.
- Maus Magill, born in 1970
I don’t even care.
- Atamasama born in 1977
Huh?
- commasense, born in 1955.
Thank you for the disclaimer. I just want to point out that I never mentioned fear, and another path to anger (perhaps another kind of anger) is with eyes wide open to reality, not fear of things you don’t understand.
If you don’t start with fear, then (in my opinion) you don’t progress to hate. In fact you could easily leave anger out of that statement and say that fear leads to hate.
Naw, the Sith would never leave anger out of it.
Combine fear and anger, then all you need is a target. And the GQP will happily provide you with a plethora of them.
(Has Q been active at all of late? I avoid him/her/it as much as possible, but even so I would have thought there would have been something.)
Now that I think about it, I’m surprised that I haven’t heard of any fake “Q” accounts on Twitter during the blue-chex-for-all fiasco.
If Trump and the MAGAts were in the rear-view mirror, I’d agree with you, but they are not – they keep jumping in front pining to be relevant again.
Thanks for that research. Also: yikes.
You can’t blame people who define themselves as “the young” for calling for recognition for having voted. It’s a fine old tradition for various groups–defined by demographic traits or anything else–to make similar claims. Squeaky wheels and all that.
But: damn. Sure would like to see those numbers increase in the next one.
whatever