More details about the “data” in the link below. The guy who did this is very much a Trumper, and he’s the only person who filed a claim.
“I still think chances are probably small that I’ll see it,” he said. “But again, I wish people would get the lesson that it’s okay to challenge your own beliefs.”
The 11th Circuit might reverse her, but I strongly doubt they’ll force her off the case. That just isn’t done. The federal system is very invested in the concept of “you get the sucky judge you get and there is nothing you can do about it.”
But might the visibility and historical significance be factors that force their hand? I realize I’m asking you if an unprecedented, perhaps-existential-to-our-democracy scenario might well lead to an unprecedented decision. I’ll answer that one: yes, it might.
But doesn’t this particular case and its import at least shake your confidence in how the court will rule?