Sorry man, I missed that reference. That snark was quite good and not meant to be much of an insult.
Can’t believe I missed that reference…that is a favorite movie.
[Moderator Note]
This is ATMB. Let’s dial it back here.
It sure could. It could also be construed as mild chiding or poking fun. For those who construe it as an insult, I suggest lightening the fuck up - it was a joke, son.
If you’re not familiar with Animal House, the comment can’t be an insult because it wouldn’t make any sense at all.
Calling somebody an asshat is not snark. It’s name calling, and that’s definitely against the rules. There isn’t a blanket rule against snark, which as I understand it is supposed to involve a little pointed humor. If you’d answered me with an insulting comment from the movie or something like that, I’d have smiled and moved on. I think giving a mod note for what you said was fair. (My post did start the whole thing.) I was making a joke about your history teacher as an excuse for the mistake in the thread title. I realize you didn’t take it that way (although to be honest I wasn’t sure how serious your reply to me was). But I wasn’t trying to call you an idiot or anything else, and I’m sorry if it came off that way. I’ve made plenty of mistakes here that were worse than that one.
Does it really have to be “all or nothing” with you folks? O.K.
I propose that, for a period of one month, all mods and admins treat the members with nothing but dry respect(no kidding, no jokes, no light snark). During that same month, all posters must treat each other, and the mods, the same way. No sarcasm, no sniping, no snarking, no attacking etc.
Could you do it?
Let’s not pretend there’s anything like evenhanded responses to such-type snarky remarks. I can recall getting the shit blasted out of me, by Tom in GD, for implying that some debating adversary had missed an essential afternoon of his early schooling. Mods can plainly slide across fields of shit without getting their hair mussed FAR more easily than us lowly peons. The simple (and accurate) explanation is “Do as I say, not as I do.”
Of course, and that was my point. Or am I being whooshed?
I can, and usually do.
ETA: Crap. Missed the part about other posters. Can’t claim to be snark-free on a regular basis there. But I am usually reasonably polite with mods.
Nm.
The floor would be soaked with blood from all the tongue-biting. 
No warnings were issued in the original thread to anyone. What is your point, exactly?
Personal opinion: If another moderator or admin. was online, you would probably have been well advised to have him/her do any Mod Note that might be needed in a thread you’re using snark in, simply to avoid the issue that’s come up here. Not intended as criticism but as advice on apparent conflict of interest avoidance.
Cite?
The mods around here need to be more snarky and sarcastic. That’s part of the board’s appeal, and it sure beats the brusque dismissals and deadpan rudeness that sometimes pops up.
A couple of months ago I got warned for the same thing in GQ. A reply to me made no sense. I replied “English motherfucker, do you speak it?”, a well understood reference to Pulp Fiction for anybody under the age of 30 and not a shut-in, and a film a lot younger than Animal House. When I queried Colibri, his response was that moderators cannot be expected to understand every cultural reference:
Yet, here we have a moderator using another snarky reference from a film which was initially understood as an insult. Where is the consistency?
Quit whining. Out of context, your quote calls another poster a motherfucker. Out of context, Marley’s quote calls someone not very familiar with WWII dates. If you can’t tell the difference, you need a different board to frequent.
Sure, there’s a difference in degree, possibly. Though I’ve never seen “English motherfucker, do you speak it” used in anything other than a jocular fashion. Perhaps you’re new to this Internet thing? However, the rule’s against insults period — not a certain grade of insult. In which case, taken out of context, Marley’s quote is still an insult (and was taken as one by originally by the guy at whom it was aimed — hence the need for this thread).
“Possibly”? You’ve got to be kidding me. Saying there’s “possibly” a difference between “motherfucker” and “your history teacher was Bluto” is laughable, disingenuous at best.
Taking insult at something that isn’t insulting is a deficiency best cured by sacking up and putting on a pair of big boy pants.
Ahhhh I was sooo confused this morning. I knew I didn’t start a thread! It’s a fine title and thank you. I didn’t mean to stir up trouble, I was just curious about the rules, that’s all. 