A quick question about Avatar

Borrowed a friend’s Avatar DVD and frankly I wish she had paid me for my time. 2 1/2 hours of Dances With wolves IN SPACE!!! crossed with the graphics engine from Far Cry 2 churning furiously behind the blandest, most cliched white-man-meets-hot-alien-babe plot since James T. Kirk put the Captain’s Log whatever green-skinned B-list starlet needed cabfare that week. The visual fx and strong performances by the supporting cast made it look better than it actually was, but once the wow factor of giant blue spacekitties and flying dinosaurs wore off, the threadbare plot elements and dialogue that clunked like lead weights were brought into sharp relief like the knees in a hobo’s pants. The only character that made any kind of impression on me was the kill-happy Colonel Quaritch, whom I would like to nominate as this decade’s new Chuck Norris. Honestly, if the movie was all about him and his raw, manly badassery, I’d go without rent just to buy a Blu-Ray player and wear the DVD down to a puddle watching it every day. But of course, this being James Cameron’s pet project of a Gary-Stu self insert Anvillicious eco-fantasy, the villains have to be cartoonishly evil while the oh-so-perfect peaceful aliens are portrayed as having the only correct point of view, without any shades of gray or any middle ground to reach. If you’re not a Na’vi, avatar, or Na’vi sympathetic scientist, prepare to get pwned by a Deus Ex Gaia that just sweeps in out of nowhere in the final reel.

What’s worse, the final shooting script for Avatar contains several pages of fleshing-out backstory that was cut from the film for time, scenes which would have helped fill in the blanks as to why it was so important to mine the miracle mineral unobtanium, the event that led to the school being closed and the open hostilities between the Na’vi and the mining company, the fact that the Na’Vi were running guerilla raids on RDA property, and so on. What could have been a great miniseries or even an hour long dramatic series ends up playing like a press kit for its own franchise.

Final thought: A- for effects, D for plot, though when the sequel is inevitably made, hopefully Cameron will clear up some of these plot holes.

Before the story went all Dances With Wolves it was the best sequel to Aliens anyone has made. Worthington was obviously playing Corporal Hicks/Kyle Reese. Michelle Rodriguez was softer than Jeanette Goldstein as Vasquez and Giovanni Ribisi was a less sympathetic Carter Burke than Paul Reiser. Was Sigorney Weaver reprising her role as Ellen Ripley, or was she Dianne Fossey? When they got into the Matrix she was actually pretty nice.

I thought the movie was great, but even I saw the similarities between Avatar and Pocahontas right away.

Weaver’s character is seen smoking in a couple of scenes. That’s pretty much it. I don’t recall her or anybody else commenting on it at any point. I never really understood why people got so worked up over it.

I seem to recall Weaver or Cameron saying that the smoking was supposed to illustrate some sort of dichotomy between her human self and her avatar self, or something like that. It was a stretch, but really, who cares?

Re: the movie as a whole – no hate here. In 3-D, I got completely swept up into the visuals, sat back and let it pull me in. I had a good time at the movies. After it was over I realized there wasn’t a whole lot more to take away from it, but the same could be said for a lot of other films that entertained me much less.