My analysis is that it’s poorly written and as for refutation, it’s too poorly written for me to figure out what about it, if anything, needs to be refuted.
Are you saying it is from someone else? That’s what I’m trying to clear up, if you are the author or not. If you are not the author then who is? That will tell us something about it. If it’s not yours then give us your take on it.
My purpose is to be able to understand the meaning of the quote because the creator (Zodiac) seems like a very hard person to understand but he or she has confessed in the past that they have degrees in Linguistics, Philosophy and Anthropology. Also according to a website, as long as you put quote marks then it is ok. Also you guys are the first to point it out.
All I ever did was ask you guys for advice with help on understanding and analysing the quote at hand and all I ever got on this site was ‘I am reporting you’ or is it your essay etc.
I even used quote marks so what is the problem? No other forum would start drama
I will not be using this site in future if this is how you guys treat people.
Oh, this is just a little critical preamble, sort of trying to get a clue what the quote’s purpose is supposed to be. The shredding hasn’t started.
Of course it’s difficult to disagree with something that has no conclusion. It’s like someone sitting on a porch chair, insulting the kids walking by, but not even bothering to say “stay off my lawn!”