I had a WTF? reaction until I Googled and found this among info about celebrated netizens:
And, yeah, I’m a reporter (for a much smaller paper). It’s not usual for papers to email at random. Unless there’s some sort of connection to the story, it wouldn’t be worth it. (We are wayyy too busy to mess with stuff like that.) If you have some reason to believe your email isn’t from the Houston paper, just don’t answer. If you think it’s genuine, share with the reporter what you shared with us. If you’ve got no story, it should end there.
If the address this e-mail came from isn’t @dallasnews.com or maybe @belo.com (Belo being the company that owns the DMN), I would be very suspicious of its authenticity. That said, of course e-mail addresses can be forged.
FYI, we do have at least one Doper, malkavia, who knew Brandon. The Pit thread, which unfortunately attracted some jerks, was Brandon, you will be missed.
I would not just not respond. That’s asking for one of those “So-and-so refused to comment” tags that makes it sound like you know something you aren’t saying. Make it clear that you don’t know anything and consider yourself not connected (or whatever) to the story.
KneadToKnow, it’s obvious that I am not NEARLY important enough for a “refused to comment” line. He just wanted opinions of people in the area who have live cams on their websites.
I might have asked malkavia if he wanted to comment, but the deadline was this afternoon. Oh well. Just thought it odd.