Heh. I should have considered your presence in the thread and been more clear in my ancient media trope!
I don’t think you understand the mening of the word ‘evidence’. Evidence is not proof. Evidence can be weak or strong, circumstantial or empirical. Evidence needed to start an investigation is not the sme as the evidence needed to convict.
I have said nothing about Hunter’s guilt, or Joe’s guilt. I have been outlining the evidence used to justify an inquiry. And there is plenty of that.
Your own?
Evidence you would accept, and that bar seems to be buried in the Mariana Trench.
There’s plenty more evidence that this was ordered by Trump under the threat of unleashing the MAGA lunatics on any Republican that doesn’t follow his orders as revenge for his completely justified impeachments. Way more evidence for that, than for … what is the exact crime that Biden is being accused of again? I still don’t think they’ve ever specified that.
Not handing over the Presidency to Trump.
No you haven’t, you’ve been repeating GOP lies. There’s no actual evidence. Haven’t you read the responses? The GOP is lying about the evidence.
The things stated as evidence must be true. Nothing you’ve provided reaches that level.
Keep telling yourself that.
What is the best evidence you have given us?
Other than “Hunter Biden gots a laptop!!”, that is.
Submitted as evidence of nefarious activity is multiple people testifying under oath that the no nefarious activity occurred.
Evidence of a cover-up!!!
We will, because that’s what the facts demonstrate. That you haven’t even bothered trying to respond to us when we demonstrate these facts says something about you.
Dude, that’s why they’ve got to impeach Biden, in order to gather evidence of a crime. Didn’t you get your MAGA memo on this? That’s how the justice system works, first you have a trial, then you figure out what the charges are, then gather evidence. Then you make an accusation of a specific crime.
But this doesn’t count as a political witch hunt because that’s only when a Republican gets in trouble for their actions. Do I have that right?
Well, he has responded by “wahhhh, you’re all picking on me.” That’s a response. HA! Game set and match.
Even if you can’t find one.
You’re catching on quick.
Maybe we need another Benghazi hearing.
No no no.
First, you pronounce sentence. Then the trial, then charges, etc.
Maybe just execute first, you know, to be safe?