So what the hell is the place good for besides scratching very large drawings in the dirt?
People apparently drive big trucks there. Perhaps they are just passing through.
Not really dirt. Pea-gravel. The reddish volcanic material overlays lime, which is white. When the lime is exposed, it concretes, in what little moisture there is in the air there, stabilizing the trenches somewhat. There is not enough moisture for growing things to get a foothold on the plain.
I just saw something about how the Incas took prisoners up on this man made volcano shaped mountain and sacrificed them.
Maybe time for a replay.
I’m with you too. FUCKERS. They need to be castrated and force-fed their own testicles.
Let’s not forget the bozos who did this:
The Nazca Lines are not an environmental issue, they are an intriguing historical artifact. Not much irony there.
Forgive me, but I see no evidence of any destruction of Nazca lines in that picture, nor do I see any description of the alleged damage, and the story in your link is full of inaccuracies and contradictions.
Backtracking thru the links, the original story has no mention at all of destruction of any Nazca lines. This is the only relevant quote in the original BBC story:
Do we have any real evidence or information about any Nazca lines that were “irrevocably damaged” by these Greenpeacers? (Greenpeacniks? Greanpeas? What’s the proper plural here?)
Because right now, it looks to me like the IFLS folks were sloppy as hell and/or deliberately trying to demonize Greenpeace.