Adolf Hitler didn't use chemical weapons?!

They’re part of the GOP plan to replace the Affordable Care Act. Spicer was just taking thr opporunity to float the idea in the middle of this briefing.

#LetHimMisspeak

Yeah, but they were Russian soldiers, so not real people.

Don’t take the bait. The poster in question is…slowly fishing.

Stranger

Here’s their conclusion: *Our ruling

Spicer said Hitler never used chemical weapons. The Nazi regime brought an industrial approach to mass murder of its citizens and others it sought to exterminate. The construction of gas chambers and the use of deadly gas was fundamental to that strategy.

While the convention against chemical weapons did not exist in World War II, the modern definition would encompass the Nazi gas chambers. It makes no difference whether victims are brought to a room filled with deadly gas, or if the gas is sent to them in a bombing raid.

We rate this claim Pants on Fire.*

Pervitin

I don’t think you’re going to like it

Looked it up, its just plain ol’ meth. Which is evil. Weed good, coke wicked, meth evil. Now, I’m not a superstitious man, I don’t believe that if a priest snaps a cracker in two and mumbles some Latin, the cracker is holy. A cracker cannot be holy because a substance cannot have a spiritual quality, because it has no life.

Meth is evil.

Shirley, you’re joking.

You know, I’m an atheist these last 40 years or so, and I think you could have made your point without shitting all over the Eucharist.

Why? The ones that get used end up as shit.

If you go for the textual meaning, he said Hitler didn’t use chemical weapons. Which is false. If you go for the overall message, it was justifying the attack on Assad because Assad is worse than Hitler. Seeing as he has no concentration camps, that is also false.

This was followed by five clarifications, none of which actually fixed anything. He had to switch to an full unreserved apology, and even that isn’t accepted because he didn’t do it right away. And a horribly stupid argument, by someone whose job it is to speak well.

He’s just as stupid and incompetent and malicious as Trump. Why does anyone feel the need to find the one way they can defend him? What’s the fucking point?

You should consider changing your username to “Edgelord.”

Why is it necessary to say someone is worse than Hitler? Has saying someone is as bad as Hitler lost its punch?

*Nazi *meth. Double evil !

Now that you sorta kinda mention, has the mystery of meth’s invention been finally resolved? For a while, it was the Nazis, then I heard it was the Japanese.

The Germans invented everything in your medicine cabinet. Th’ Bayer aspirin, th’ heroin, everything.

I thought for sure this was a joke. But, nope. Nazi boner meth was really called Pervitin.

In fact, now that I think about it, you and Elucidator can both style yourselves as Ultra-Edgelords for talking so about the Eucharist on Holy Thursday/Good Friday. You’re both just so daring!

My admiration and affection for Jesus of Nazareth does not extend to those who claim to represent him.

Yeah, look what the fuckers did to Jeanne d’Arc.

Church Judges: “When Saint Michael appeared to you…was he…naked?” (Leer)
Joanie: “Do you think God would have been unable to clothe him?”

Was that Gertrude Stein in the starring role?

Mind your manners. Falconetti was a great actress, even if she only did the one film!

The Passion of Joan of Arc - Wikipedia See paragraph one.

No evidence for that. Possible.