California law is not relevant in Pennsylvania.
Deal with it.
California law is not relevant in Pennsylvania.
Deal with it.
Yeah, but you’ve got to expect different laws to apply in places where the days are longer, the nights are stronger than moonshine.
You don’t care, I know.
Did you get this from the driver’s handbooks cited in post #66? Because that’s not what they say. Or do you have another cite for this?
(I haven’t been paying attention to this thread lately, so I might have missed it, but I did notice that people were somehow interpreting post 66 as evidence that bikes weren’t allowed on sidewalks.)
OK, smart ass here is the Penn law that you appear to be unfamiliar with.
Like the ones that say you can’t impede traffic by going 30 or 40 mph under the speed limit?
Depends on one’s location.
(emphasis added)
Don’t those damn children know that riding their bikes on the sidewalk is illegal? (According to Rick’s logic, at least.)
Like the ones that say you can’t impede traffic by going 30 or 40 mph under the speed limit?
Then why not explicitly state “bicycles are not allowed on roads w/speed limit above 35”? Since it appears that it isn’t explicitly stated (except for highways where I have seen statements that would exclude bicycles from being on them), and yet there’s all this other verbage about bikes and cars sharing the road, I think you have to assume that the impede traffic by going 30 or 40 mph under the speed limit isn’t meant to include bicyclists.