Advertising for women's underwear - offensive?

Do you find this advertising campaign amusingly witty or just tacky?

I didn’t fill out the ten page questionair to register.
Can you describe it?

Tacky. Women in red lingerie, script ad reads “Come Dasher, Come Dancer, Come Prancer, Come John…”

I had no problem viewing the link. I am so shocked and offended that they are asking us to link sexy lingerie with … sex! The nerve! This woman is inviting men to have orgasms at the sight of her lingerie! She must find men sexually attractive and enjoy sex or something! Good God! It’s a scandal, a tempest in a C-cup if ever I saw one!

It wouldn’t have even warranted a raised eyebrow if I were to see it on a billboard near here, let alone any feelings of offense.

People are too sensitive sometimes.

Offensive, no.
Tack and tasteless, yes.

Unless it’s spelled c-u-m, I refuse to believe that the young lady was doing anything more than inviting her friends over for a prayer session.

Sarah Maddison of the Women’s Electoral Lobby (is anyone else turned on by that?) says the ad is “offensive and denigrating”? Give me a break.

Tacky, yes; offensive, no. I think it could have been wittier with just a few minutes’ consideration, but if we’re being realistic, at least one of the men she’s inviting over for sex will probably rip one of the little hooks off the bra or something and wreck it forever.

LOL!!

Damn right. Bras should be designed with a quick-release remote control!

What **Evil Captor ** said. There clearly is some form of discrimination going on here. Where in the man posing seductively with his abs of granite, perfect pecs, white teeth and well coifed hair wearing only his boxers whilst giving a come hither look. The tag line could be:

Bell’s on Bob’s Tail Ring

It is an outrage! A brew-ha-ha in boxers! I won’t stand for it!

Of course! They’re all designed to do that quickly, so the man has to go out and buy more! It’s a conspiracy, I tell you.

Actually, it’s “Come Dasher, come Dancer, Come Dave, Come John…”

I was interested to note that one of the sidebar headlines says:

Bit of bush know-how uncovers new cycle of science

:smiley:

Appropriate, that.

I just want to say that I have a new mental image when I hear “come Dancer” now.

And a sudden urge to give away $1 bills.

Oh God
Oh God
Oh God

Embarasingly I didn’t even think of the double meaning of the word “come” until I read the article. Apparently, I’m an innocent.

Same here. I just thought the name should not have been John, which implies she’s a prostitute. It should have been some other man’s name.

But what is offensive to me is that I guess she will have sex with reindeer. That just seems illogical. Not only that, it might hurt. And woujld the reindeer care about the lingerie? It’s hard to say. I’ve never talked to one.

:wink:

I don’t think it’s offensive. A little weird that she’s calling two men over, but it’s hardly worthy of a panic attack.

We have ads for maternity stores that show more skin than that!

Sex sells!

Where can I buy some?

Advertising women’s underwear is always welcome. I can’t be the only man that got through puberty with the Sears Catalog. :rolleyes: